Version: 2008

Comments on: NBA PR man admits he's anonymous commenter

Raymond Ridder, PR man for the Golden State Warriors, admits he went on the WarriorsWorld.net fan site and posted anonymous comments. He wanted the discussion to go in a "more positive direction."

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by cvaldes1831 May 23, 2009 10:34 AM PDT
Congratulations, you scored zero points on the integrity scale. Thank you for playing, Flunkster!
Reply to this comment
by karpenterskids May 23, 2009 11:18 AM PDT
I won't post anything positive about this article, because God forbid that it might cause others to do the same...
Reply to this comment
by tccedar May 23, 2009 4:11 PM PDT
Terrible article. Hard to follow, convoluted; tries way too hard to be cute and clever. Ugh. And who cares who Funkster is? The guy's a dork to try to hide his identity as a Warrior's employee, but big deal! It's not like he was insider trading and cost shareholders millions.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 May 23, 2009 5:20 PM PDT
Who wants to bet someone will comment on here about a company totally unrelated to the article.
Reply to this comment
by gertruded May 23, 2009 7:46 PM PDT
You just don't what Microsoft brought into this subject.
by PhaseDMA May 23, 2009 6:45 PM PDT
So let me get this straight. Some guy that works for a company commented about that company in a positive way?

What shall we do? CRY!

From this day on we must enact a law. Thou shall not say anything positive about the companies they work for - Negative comments are okay and in fact encouraged though!
Reply to this comment
by wshwe May 23, 2009 7:23 PM PDT
The Warriors should fire Flunkster. What an apt name for a dishonest person!
Reply to this comment
by gertruded May 23, 2009 7:44 PM PDT
It seems as if Microsoft employees comment regularly in Microsoft's favor on this board. How may times have we read how great Visa is, or how good Windows 7 will be?

Why shouldn't people working for other corporations do the same? Honesty and truth have nothing to do with business and marketing. Only money counts.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 May 24, 2009 10:01 AM PDT
Because anyone who doesn't hate Microsoft products is paid by MS?

So 90% of the computing community must be paid off right?
by benjwah May 24, 2009 8:02 PM PDT
You don't like it, go to.... Wait, there aren't any communist countries left. Wait, I just remembered, North Korea!
by EENetminder May 23, 2009 8:02 PM PDT
Knowing Warriors fans, one has to wonder if Ridder has been editing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_State_Warriors too. No mention of Cohan's ignorance or Bobby Rowell's ineptness in getting rid of Chris Mullen -- just to say that Larry Riley is the new GM.

For that matter, if you read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Riley, it reads like a press release that a low-on-the-ethics-scale PR flack would write.

Sic 'em, Kawakami!! It'll annoy all those Merc readers who can't stand you!!...
Reply to this comment
by ralfthedog May 23, 2009 9:22 PM PDT
When I read about an NBA commenter posting on the internet with a fake name, I thought they might be talking about me. Then I remembered I don't have any relation to the NBA.
Reply to this comment
by baconstang May 24, 2009 12:34 AM PDT
What! OMG, you mean Microsoft isn't the only one who pays trolls?
Reply to this comment
by gertruded May 24, 2009 5:18 AM PDT
I find it very hard to believe that Microsoft would stoop so low as to actually pay people to support their view on any internet forum.

NO company is that bad. Paying people to do that could be considered dishonest.
by dcardozo May 25, 2009 10:45 AM PDT
Well, they don't call it that way.
MS pays to several people that support their view in several internet forums, including this one.
If you ask them, they don't pay people for supporting their view. They would say they pay them as regular employees.
They're hardly the only ones that do that, other companies do the same, just not as much as MS.
And of course, there's nothing illegal in doing that.
by monkeyfun14 May 25, 2009 2:57 PM PDT
@dcardozo

And do you have a source?
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement