Comments on: Google Street View has to reshoot in Japan
After complaints from many people that their Street View cameras caught too many private moments, Google has to reshoot every Japanese image.
After complaints from many people that their Street View cameras caught too many private moments, Google has to reshoot every Japanese image.
The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
Photos: Unboxing Nexus One
faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.
Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Add this feed to your online news reader
I agree, though, however I think completion (more cities) is just as important as image quality.
who want s the a whole lot of people to know about something like that !
I can see this being a problem in other countries as well !
In the final analysis, this isn't that different from mobile phone records (which identify the tower through which one connects) or highway toll transponders being used for the same purpose: showing that someone was in one place when s/he said s/he was in another.
Let's face it. We may not be down to exactly no privacy any more, but there's a lot less than there used to be.
~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~
If no foul play was involved from powers in place, everyone would stick to the good old natural laws in all countries: on the public street, view is public, you can see and watch and photography everything and everyone you want, with only the very limited usual reservations:
- not having a permanent view from too high over the private parts of a property (this law for houses' windows could be applied to Google StreetView cameras)
- not harassing people (like paparazzis). For this (which doesn't concern StreetView), it should only state that you can't approach a person nearer than 5 steps without their (implicit) consent. Such a law would never hamper regular people, but if you feel harassed, you simply show that you want to be left alone, this would suffice to forbid paparazzis to come nearer than 5 steps. If they keep farther, they can make all the photos they want, they won't really hurt you - and they will remain able to do their job and fill their DUTY of reporting information.
I recall that "Republic", from "res publica", means that everything of public interest must be treated by everybody, so NOTHING MUST BE HIDDEN, excepted private parts, that should be very limited (inside of houses and cars), and the same for all (Police as everyone). This being a fundamental rule for peace, liberty and security, is of course dearly defended by regular honest citizens, and equally strongly fought by all powers seeking to establish dictatorship - which unfortunately includes ALL the political powers nowadays.
Versailles, Thu 14 May 2009 18:12:50 +0200
- by mikebellman May 14, 2009 1:00 PM PDT
- Poor Google. I wish they'd just leave the pictures alone. Facebook, Twitter and other website are fairly public meaning that if you or your friends put something "out there" Expect it to be viewed, read and explored by someone.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(10 Comments)I would like to travel the world on Google Street View, but the images that are on the website now make me feel like I am watching a low budget 1980's SciFi flick.