Comments on: NASA astronauts to drink their own urine today?
The latest NASA mission is trying out a new water recycling device.
The latest NASA mission is trying out a new water recycling device.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Add this feed to your online news reader
;-)
If you look deeper into "why" this is being done you will understand that it is for the new focus of NASA, long term space travel - to the moon, mars, and beyond. This long term travel requires a lot of water and food for astronaut consumption - load, energy, and money needed to launch this basic need.
The cost effective experiment of finding a way to reduce the load of a launch and the usage of perfectly good water in urine is a lot better than trying to launch ALL the required water for a long term trip and your wallet. All the water needed would require more than one launch.
SO, this is a good experiment for the cost, and load, efficiency of space travel. If you can get past your own ignorance on the subject you might see the importance of this "not so glamorous" experiment.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IZE-4ZjPVI
The Russians have had this Technology for decades.
I?ve used one and it works. It is NOT worth 250 million dollars, and it does not leave an iodine flavor in your mouth.
Why can?t NASA use the Russian version ?
Is it too late for a refund?
"DOES EVERYONE BELIEVE THAT THE FISH THAT RESIDE IN OUR DRINKING WATER RESEVOIRS GET OUT OF THE WATER TO PEE AND POO?"
DRINK UP FOLKS... IT'S JUST PART OF LIFE!
Get over your selves guys.
(And by the way, 250 million$ is NOTHING! We are wasting 14 billion$ per day in Iraq. The International Space Station of Pancakes cost us a mere 450 billion dollars to build and counting) so get over the price of the pissgizmo NASA's lucky if they can get down to 3 on a count down, let alone save our tax dollars.
You remember the "Deep Impact" program? We gave NASA 200 million $ so they could build a technologically advanced satilite and then intentionally crash it into an asteroid. So to put things in perspective I think NASA has actually done worse.
Hmm... Fly to the International Space Station, live there for six months, drink recycled, cleaned waste-water,
or,
Stay here on Earth, roll out of bed every morning, drink recycled, cleaned waste-water? Wonder which one I'd choose.
"Leavin' on a jet plane..."
The "reporters" at news.com need to stop jacking our ***** and acting like Katie Curic eating Chocolate Icecream and drinking lemonade while watching 2girls1cup in a California crackhouse. There's only one thing more disgusting and that's reading a blog entry about who whizzed in whose tang on the international space station and who enjoyed it more. If it bothers you that much then by all means don't visit the international space station and make sure next year to vote for politicians who are competent enough to bring an end to multimillion dollar designer water machines that pump out Urinade in space. I mean, who knows, maybe Nasa wants to bottle astronaut piddle for sale as both an aphrodesiac and a weight loss supplement on late night infomercials on Cspan, whatever floats your boat, just don't report on it to me and then complain you had to report on it.
I'd be interested in whether they used a heating system for distillation, or employed a vacuum distillation process (heating requires more energy, they're surrounded in vacuum up there.)
As for a faint taste of iodine, you get that using traditional methods of water purification. Always carried iodine tablets as a boy scout for filling canteens in the feild.
By the way, people imprisoned in camps by the Nazi's before and during WWII sometimes had to drink their own urine, as they were denied adequate water. You can do that for the first pass through without too much adverse effect. More than that and you put too great a strain on your own kidney's.
- by Zanny_Blowzsteve November 17, 2008 6:46 PM PST
- And back in the 70's we though TANG! tasted bad.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 3 pages (55 Comments)"It's what the astronaults drank"
Next up... Patches O'Houlihan in space... "Because it's sterile & he likes the taste".