Comments on: Buyer sued for eBay feedback
A man who purchased a scratched phone is being sued by the seller, who claims comments he left on eBay's feedback facility hurt his business.
A man who purchased a scratched phone is being sued by the seller, who claims comments he left on eBay's feedback facility hurt his business.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Add this feed to your online news reader
So my recent experience was just a concern about shipping charges on an item I purchased. My Neutral Rating (not negative mind you) comment:
"Understand S&H fee. Handling valid-but actual USPS $5 paid $33 bought 10 units"
He was more than a little miffed. In fact sending me a vitriole filled email about my ungrateful nature. LOL Oh yeah and he informed me I was now on his "Don't Sell to" list. A crushing blow to my commerce life. But honestly this seller has a near perfect rating. I am his only neutral rating and he has one negative from over a year ago. So he has another year to go now to get back to perfect. But somehow I will live through the shame.
Shipping isn't cheap. At least if you want it done right so that what you buy arrives in one piece. This is not to say that some on eBay don't gouge you, but people need to keep in mind the true costs of shipping and not just their narrow idea that is it simply what the shipper charges to ship it the cheapest way possible.
Companies like eBay and PayPal don't help matters when they require you to do certain things in order to be protected by the protection guarantees. This is the big reason I don't deal with eBay or PayPal it just costs way too much. Well, that and eBay is now more like a Latino flea market than a place for people to sell used items they don't want. It went too commercial with too much of the same cr@p.
Robert
Thank you for telling your story.
Chris
GET A LIFE!
Yours is an extraordinary story. Did you HAVE to fill out the retraction form? Why did you HAVE to fill it out? What would have happened if you refused? Has the concept of the customer always being right, or at least some of the time, disappeared?
Did the fax actually come from eBay?
Chris
Recently, I bought an iPod on eBay. The fellow already left me feedback. I went ahead, at the delivery of the item, discovered the iPod is defective, and I left him negative feedback, as did somebody else for another reason. Before I did, I sent this idiot a good number of e-mails asking him to help me. First, he tells me it's for "Mac", which is useless, as long iTunes is on any PC (I use the 1979 definition of PC, and not the incorrect lumping of all Winblows computers into a model of an IBM computer) if working, the iPod will be seen by the application. Also, it didn't matter if it was Mac of Winblows, as the 20+ PCs I use (15 Macs, 5 Winblows) the iPod wouldn't work. He e-mails me back and tells me to get the "drivers" for the iPod. Except there are no iPod "drivers", because iTunes has the "drivers" so to speak. After I told him to get a better testing process and that he can keep my money even though he sent me a defective iPod, he sent me an insulting e-mail as a response. It's that response that got him the negative feedback. I pointed out to him two things: (1) The date my account was opened on eBay, and (2) My 400+ positive rating. His rating was under ten at the time.
Bottomline: He should've been a better seller to work-out the defective problems of the products and should've thorough tested the product.
Sellers can NO LONGER GIVE NEGATIVE FEEDBACK ON BUYERS.
I put that in caps so it stands out. Buyers can give all the negative feedback they want on sellers, but sellers cannot do anything in the other direction - no matter how flaky or fraudulent auction winners are. Thus it's not particularly surprising that this type of action resulted from that strange policy move.
Regardless how justified or unjustified the seller was in the example cited in your article - you have to admit that's a rather bizarre policy.
I've been using ebay since before it was called ebay. I have many times lamented how they have become increasingly hostile to the interests of bidders/buyers. There must be many like me for them to have inexplicably created that assymetrical feedback policy.
But there needs to be much more transparency in the process overall. eBay has been increasingly clamping-down on that over the years. You cannot even see the user ID's of bidders on most items with values >$100 ($50?) now - eBay claims this is for "security" or "anti-fraud" reasons, but the reality is that this sort of loss of transparency at ebay has been progressive for years now.
They have moved recently to create a better support infrastructure - ie setting up phone support banks. But that move was years overdue - it has long been absurd that it was nearly impossible to even discover any sort of contact info whatsoever for either Paypal or eBay - forcing you to jump through byzantine mazes of web-form-based nonsense - and then wait weeks or months - in an effort to avail yourself of promised "transaction guarantees" and so forth. Well it seems that falling profits over there has finally woken them up a little.
To add insult to injury, their dealings with craigslist (after their sneaky "backdoor" takeover of certain craigslist shares) have been despicable. I only wish there were a viable alternative right now.
I also agree with some other comments; if you don't like the way eBay works, don't use it.
- by MorningBit October 24, 2008 8:09 AM PDT
- Fun article, but your title is not what happened. You said he threatened to sue, not that he DID sue.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(13 Comments)