Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10

Comments on: Virgin turns down $1 million for galactic porn movie

Virgin Galactic declines an offer from a porn producer to shoot zero gravity sex.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Michichael October 7, 2008 11:41 AM PDT
I believe NASA already did experiments on this kinda stuff. You'd need a special elastic band to make it work and even then it wasn't very... fun. I forget where I read it though.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 7, 2008 12:05 PM PDT
A special elastic bad? Eek. That just sounds so fabulously dreadful.

I can imagine that must have upset you...

Chris
by Ghostdog2 October 7, 2008 11:59 AM PDT
There was actually a zero gravity porn movie shot a long time ago called 'The Uranus Experiment', it wasn't in space but in one of those planes where you can experience zero gravity. Here's an article about it:

http://www.space.com/sciencefiction/movies/uranus_experiment_000516.html
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 7, 2008 12:06 PM PDT
Now how come you knew about that Ghostdog2? Huh? Did you actually watch it?

Chris
by Solaris_User October 7, 2008 1:27 PM PDT
Virgin is only delaying the inevitable.. some day we will have space porn.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis October 8, 2008 9:38 AM PDT
I'm sorta surprised that we DON'T have porn in a place that looks like the international space station. I could have sworn that I saw an amateur production on one of the streaming porn sites that was in this genre.
by doconn7 October 7, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
If it takes porn to make space travel happen for the rest of us, why not?
After all isn't that where all the money is? Come on! Flying around in a giant phallic symbol with Virgin stamped on its back and a pin up painted on the front! Tell me that's not indecent. . .
Reply to this comment
by Swooley October 7, 2008 10:14 PM PDT
This would be great for Virgin. Not only would they get publicity, but look at their name, "Virgin," no one could ever forget them. Besides porn is the reason why normal people began to use the internet. I feel this could be the same concept, the catalyst for commercial space travel.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 8, 2008 8:58 AM PDT
Hah. Brilliant logic, Swooley. You could be right.

Chris
by Rick Cavaretti October 8, 2008 7:45 AM PDT
Still, Virgin's extraordinary and surprising intransigence on this alluring space sexperiment means that those who have had to tolerate suboptimal sex for so many years will have to also have to do without suborbital sex for a while longer.

That line busts me up. Well done.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 8, 2008 8:59 AM PDT
Rick,

You are more than kind. Thank you.

Chris
by BenFlavoredCandy October 8, 2008 8:13 AM PDT
Reminds me of an episode of Futurama where Scruffy, the janitor, is reading a magazine called "Zero G Jugs".

As fun as that film may be, $1 mil. is too low. And certainly pornography is a) not 'publicity' for a huge corporation like Virgin, and b) definitely not what they would be remembered for, what with hundreds of pop artists on the Virgin label.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk October 8, 2008 9:01 AM PDT
Now why would you have remembered that particular scene, Ben?

Chris
(13 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Google's mobile hopes go beyond Nexus One

The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
• Photos: Unboxing Nexus One

Using your smartphone safely

faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement