Version: 2008

Comments on: The Bigfoot press conference and the art of selling a website

The alleged Bigfoot finders proved themselves masters of selling their website at their Palo Alto press conference.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (42 Comments)
by vivalaroma August 16, 2008 1:26 AM PDT
For a quintessentially "technically incorrect" approach w.r.t. the art of selling a website, check out "A slice of the mother's day market within easy reach" at http://trak.in/discuss/ and the comments-with-blinders at the auction site...
Reply to this comment
by txdeveloper August 16, 2008 6:20 AM PDT
Too bad the website is so heinous! They should have included a professional developer in that rockin' business plan!
Reply to this comment
by cnetblog August 16, 2008 7:15 AM PDT
All it takes to figure out how to create online business model that generarates revenue is to call companies who do that (like http://www.attention.cc/) for example - they even tell you on 1st page how to do it. So it is not that hard - what is hard is to get FREE traffic. And this is what bigfoot story does - creates FREE traffic that still has to be converted and monetized. Comparisons to volumes of facebook and youtube.com are amusing but very far reaching.
Reply to this comment
by antwawn August 16, 2008 8:38 AM PDT
The bigfoot they found was actually killed by a famous British hunter: http://tinyurl.com/5n82gx
Reply to this comment
by richiemgood August 16, 2008 9:41 AM PDT
BIgfoot? Where would you like me to put that bigfoot? OK, think about that a little. As for me ( http://www.currentnewsonline.com/2008/08/14/chupacabra-caught-on-tape/ ) . . . I'm going with the chupacabra story. . . . Bigfoot is 'so five minutes ago'. . . . Like I say, nessie is next ( psst ) pass it on.
Reply to this comment
by caw23 August 16, 2008 10:00 AM PDT
Interesting take but poor reporting Chris (unless you're using their hats as a metaphor.) I agree this is clever marketing but apparently you didn't actually bother to even read their hats from the presser or notice they wore none on Countdown so the hats apparently didn't do them THAT much good.
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk August 16, 2008 10:57 AM PDT
Oh, I try not to do reporting, caw23....and I was, indeed, being allegorical.

However, just for you, I have amended the above to reflect what was actually on their hats. And yes, I know they didn't wear the hats on MSNBC, but I quite clearly say it was their words that enhanced the beautiful and spiritual intentions of their hats.

Sigh. I've already bought my cap. Haven't you?

Chris
by GuyBlaise August 16, 2008 5:09 PM PDT
All is a pure fabrication. As the Bangala of Congo say,?The lie can go upstairs taking the elevator. However, the truth that takes the stairs also gets there.?
http://guyblaise.com/
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk August 16, 2008 7:14 PM PDT
Guy,

That is a great quote. You will see it again in print one day.....

Thank you for that.

Chris
by Kreuzer33 August 16, 2008 6:35 PM PDT
$24.99 for a hat! Man, I am in the wrong business!!

http://kreuzer33.wordpress.com/2008/08/16/bigfoot-press-conference-revealsnothing/
Reply to this comment
by redwoodcoast August 16, 2008 7:54 PM PDT
Want real proof that Bigfoot lives? Watch this video shot in the Northern Calfornia redwoods this week. The L.A. Times calls it much more credible than the Georgia claim: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p22BGJ6dXU
Reply to this comment
by redwoodcoast August 16, 2008 7:55 PM PDT
Want real proof that Bigfoot lives? Watch this video shot in the Northern Calfornia redwoods this week. The L.A. Times calls it much more credible than the Georgia claim. Go to YouTube [dot] com [slash] redwoodcoaster
Reply to this comment
by t26l August 16, 2008 10:09 PM PDT
Unfazed. It's "unfazed," Mr. Professional Journalist, not (aargh) "unphased."
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk August 16, 2008 11:44 PM PDT
Ah, t261,

How lovely of you to comment. Are you familiar with the concept of dual nationality?
Here is an article from my hometown newspaper from today. Hope this helps to explain my sometime international flights of fancy:
http://www.birminghampost.net/midlands-birmingham-sport/west-midlands-sports/wolves-fc/2008/07/06/jody-craddock-unphased-by-arrival-of-stearman-at-molineux-65233-21272064/
by taxonomyst August 18, 2008 7:53 AM PDT
Yeah! And at least "analization" creates an interesting picture of what they should do with their so-called evidence, but "unphased" merely makes the writer sound ignorant.
by HAL 9K August 18, 2008 5:31 PM PDT
"Faze" vs. "phase"...

While it's true that there are regional (continental) variations in English
spelling, each considered correct within context (such as "color" vs.
"colour"), this is not one of those cases.

The verb "faze" [http://Middle English fesen, to drive away, frighten, from Old English f?sian.|http://Middle English fesen, to drive away, frighten, from Old English f?sian.]
has a different meaning, etymology and spelling from the verb "phase" [Greek phasis,
appearance].

This is true no matter what side of the ocean you may call home. Anyone who says
"phased" for "fazed" is simply in need of an education.
by franglais--2008 August 17, 2008 12:19 AM PDT
Really, their website is abominable ! Have they heard of variable width tables? Or as another poster suggested, hiring a pro?
And they're being offered teaching positions in a Business School?!
Blimey!
Reply to this comment
by ezdate123 August 17, 2008 8:26 AM PDT
well if bigfoot is real I am sure he would be using ezdate123 to find a mate... The forest can be pretty difficult to find that special someone since we have spent all these years and still have not found one bigfoot either dead or alive, Mike/ezdate123
Reply to this comment
by ezdate123 August 17, 2008 10:48 AM PDT
if he had any real photos he could sell them on a photo site like royalty free stock photo gallery and make some real money.....But as we all know this is just a big hoax....what a shame....
Reply to this comment
by davet210 August 17, 2008 1:33 PM PDT
"unfazed"
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk August 17, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
Please see my reply to t261.

Chris
by roonskapper August 17, 2008 2:30 PM PDT
Well lets set the record straight, Dyer and Whitton have their own website @ bigfoottracker.com, Searchingforbigfoot.com is tom biscardi's website and has been for YEARS, and he has always sold hats and other bigfoot related items! So maybe before you jump on the bigfoot hater wagon you should do some background research.
Reply to this comment
by seeingeyeseesall August 17, 2008 4:48 PM PDT
This is what we get when Britney takes her lithium and keeps her panties on...
Reply to this comment
by CrabbyGolightly August 17, 2008 4:49 PM PDT
Crabby speculates that this latest discovery might have had something to do with the million dollar reward offered in June by binocular manufacturer Bushnell and Field & Stream magazine. The two companies offered the joint reward to anyone who can "provide an unaltered photograph/video, verified and substantiated by a panel of scientific experts [including a zoologist and biologist], the evidence required to prove a Sasquatch/Bigfoot/Yeti exists."

But as LiveScience's "bad science columnist" points out, "This is, of course, a marketing promotion and not a genuine search for Bigfoot. There's no way to authenticate a Bigfoot photograph by itself; the image is simply a two-dimensional pattern of pixels. To truly prove a Bigfoot exists, you'd need corroborating hard evidence like a body, teeth, or bones."

Crabby predicts that today we will definitively learn one thing: where we can buy"Bigfoot for President" t-shirts.
CrabbyGolightly.com
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk August 17, 2008 4:54 PM PDT
Crabby,

Welcome. It's a pleasure to make your acquaintance and see that you bring us fine, interesting information.

I am also delighted that you are not objecting to my dreadfully anglicized spelling of 'unphased.'

Chris
by propwash44 August 17, 2008 4:51 PM PDT
I concur that their assertion that the DNA is in for ANALization (the proper term is ANALYSIS) is indeed hilarious, but I suggest that the writer double-check the applicability of the term "phased" as used in this report. The correct (and more appropriate) word is FAZED, as in "they weren't FAZED..."
Look it up in your Funk & Wagnalls.

These dudes are just doing what they should....PT Barnum describes this situation best.

dj
Reply to this comment
by ChrisMatyszczyk August 17, 2008 5:16 PM PDT
Oh, propwash44,

I explained to several commenters above, that, being of dual citizenship, I am allowed to use anglicisms occasionally.

really. please let me.

Chris
by ganderhook August 17, 2008 7:24 PM PDT
BIGFOOT is alive and well. He roams the hills of Southern Ohio and visits our hunt club very often and sacks out in our guest cabin. To see, click on lazyshuntclub.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (42 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement