Version: 2008

Comments on: Microsoft's big switch to server/client computing

Debra Chrapaty, corporate vice president of Global Foundation Services at Microsoft, sheds some light on the cloud-based infrastructure supporting Microsoft's move to server/client computing.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by someguy999 June 25, 2008 3:41 PM PDT
this article was a let down, it says nearly no valuable information. oh well.
Reply to this comment
by t8 June 25, 2008 3:48 PM PDT
Hmmmm

Trust, reliability, and efficiency as mentioned are not Microsoft attributes at all.

Microsoft will find it hard to compete in this space if those are the 3 requirements.

Google is better suited here.
Reply to this comment
by itsmillertime4u June 25, 2008 4:25 PM PDT
I have to agree with someguy999, the title of this article is very misleading. I too am disappointed, as I was expecting some news about Windows terminal server, RDP, VDI, etc. Instead I was fed a boring useless story. Thanks Dan!
Reply to this comment
by chadmarkley June 25, 2008 4:48 PM PDT
Are these numbers correct??

"The company deploys 10,000 new servers per month on average to keep up with demand, Chrapaty said."

That means on average they deploy 120,000 servers each year! That doesn't seem accurate.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan June 25, 2008 9:01 PM PDT
Considering the size of the new data centers going online in Union Gap, WA where land prices are cheap and the physical buildings make a Walmart look like a garden shed... I think it's indeed very possible.
by igl00lgi June 25, 2008 11:45 PM PDT
Why would you not believe those numbers. This is MS your talking about. They save millions of billions of dollars.
by dfarber June 26, 2008 12:20 PM PDT
that's what she said....
by JeffreyYang June 25, 2008 5:03 PM PDT
Good for Microsoft, SOA is just a BS word.
Reply to this comment
by someguy999 June 25, 2008 8:09 PM PDT
btw, there was another article just posted on the webware which goes into more detail as it appears this discussion was part of a larger MS and Salesforce.com conversation... I suggest the other.

also. here's my question to the guy who says you can trust Google. why? (and once again try and contain the answer to just talking about Google, and not your feelings on MS) what makes you feel you can trust them more than say... S3 and amazon... or anybody else. App engine went down and its been less than a month... so does that build on your reliability level? It seems more like a bandwagon statement... another great example is how adwords refuses to go to the level of detail with what you'll actually get out of it to its users... basically you pay us money and we'll put you where we think you should go...
Reply to this comment
by starsfan18 June 27, 2008 7:08 AM PDT
Debra is pretty smart if she can find a way to save "millions of billions of dollars."
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Outside the Lines

Dan Farber is the editor in chief of CNET News. He has covered technology for more than two decades, and he previously served as editor in chief of ZDNet, PC Week and MacWeek. Outside the Lines explores the intersection of business and technology.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Outside the Lines topics

Subscribe to the EIC² podcast

Editors Dan Farber of News.com and Larry Dignan of ZDNet, square off in EIC² in this weekly podcast. The two editor in chiefs talk about the big tech stories of the day and provide insight and analysis.

Subscribe to this podcast using an RSS reader other than iTunes

Subscribe to this podcast using iTunes

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement