Version: 2008

Comments on: Intel set to take leap in solid-state drives

Company is planning to bring out high-capacity solid-state drives to compete with SanDisk, Toshiba, and Samsung.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by LcdGreg March 7, 2008 6:40 PM PST
I've known since cartridge video game days that no moving parts = faster computing, now more so since the read speeds are actually faster than hard drives, it may take a few years but maybe the capacity will as well exceed hard drives which currently can fit 500 GB in a 2.5" drive, I'm sure that they will milk it for profits a long while though!
Reply to this comment
by the_inventor March 8, 2008 10:27 AM PST
Garbage In = Garbage Out. Flash memory is unreliable over time.

The cost of having PERMATELY FIXED storage is too high.

Read about the real future from someone who predicted solid state storage in 1980 but
has since moved on to Spintronics and Holographics storage.

http://colossalstorage.net
Reply to this comment
by eyetexasbob March 11, 2008 5:55 AM PDT
The life span of the SSD is 50-100 years, depending on who you believe. For most of us, that is plenty of time. The only permanent storage is the mind of God. While colossal storage is cool, in theory, the SSD is now. If you are looking for sometime that lasts eternally, avoid human inventions.
Reply to this comment
by satanmode March 17, 2008 4:32 AM PDT
can anyone explain WHY write cycles wear out a SSDs, all i read on the internet is that there is a limitation to every block written.
is it the semiconductor that wears out after a million electric fluctuations (write cycles) ??
Reply to this comment
by Astonct March 26, 2008 11:08 AM PDT
Solid State Drive Array for the financial industry, especially large volume trading firms. They actually use Intel processors as well. Funny how Intel is sort of etching into the storage arena piece by piece...

A.
Reply to this comment
by sadchild May 27, 2008 8:11 AM PDT
Does SATA II mean SATA 3Gb/s?
No. The term SATA II was the name of the original organization formed to develop the SATA technology specifications. In 2004, the group changed its name to the Serial ATA International Organization, or SATA-IO.

The term SATA II is no longer valid. Unfortunately, some customers have mistaken the SATA II designation as a moniker for the 3Gb/s data transfer rate introduced with SATA-IO?s 2005 release of the SATA Revision 2.5 specification. For an accurate description of SATA capabilities and the official guideline to SATA product naming, please visit http://sata-io.org/namingguidelines.asp.
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement