Version: 2008

Comments on: Samsung defends flash reliability in solid-state drives

Company addresses questions about solid-state drive reliability and discusses the burgeoning market for the devices in enterprise servers.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by ice82 February 22, 2008 7:01 AM PST
It's good to hear that the SSD capacity will go up to 250GB soon.
I'll hold onto my laptop until next year for that 100GB+ SSD.
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 February 22, 2008 8:31 AM PST
So what is the typical write pattern for one of these drives being used instead of a standard platter hard drive? Many of the files get stored for long term without change and those areas would only receive limited writes compared to unallocated space. As the drive space is consumed to near capacity this would become a more critical issue. What then? Under those conditions, what would the expected lifetime of the flash hard drive be? Would a combination of the two be better? i.e. One platter drive for the OS (where read/write catching of virtual memory is highly active) and one flash drive for data storage.
Reply to this comment
by zag2 February 25, 2008 4:28 AM PST
I've had a Samsung 32gb SSD in my home theater computer for 6 months now, absolutely no trouble with reliability and the speed increase is massi ve. It boots in 20 seconds and launching applications is instant. Its actually very frustrating going back to a computer with a normal hard disk and waiting 1-2 seconds for apps like firefox and IE to load.

These things will revolutionize the server market if they are indeed more reliable than standard hard disks.
Reply to this comment
by nvmexpert February 26, 2008 7:14 AM PST
What made you buy a SSD for a home theatre computer? It's funny that you think 1-2 seconds is frustrating :-)
by nvmexpert February 25, 2008 8:25 AM PST
"He added that if a failure ever does occur, it will not occur in the flash chip itself but in the controller"

Are you saying that Samsung SSD's have a controller issue? How long does it take for them to fail???
Reply to this comment
by zag2 February 27, 2008 4:25 AM PST
I would expect its exactly the same probability of a HDD controller failing, Just without the risk of the mechanical parts wearing out.
by kokenge March 16, 2009 6:05 AM PDT
In Oct, 2007 i purchased 10 Dell D830 laptop for my company with the 64GB ssd. Two issues:
1) while their ramdom access speeds are indeed awesome, their sustained read/writes are pathetic. They will boot quickly, but try to open a simple 30 MB ppt, and you are waiting a while.

2) after 1.5 years, I am replacing all of them. Their speeds seem to have deteriorated over time. Worn out perhpas?

I am in the process of striping 5 ssd together in a server to test that setup. It should solve the speed issues while gaining the benefit of quick ramdom access.
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement