Comments on: Intel, Nokia announce mobile pact
The two companies create a wide-ranging deal covering chips and software for mobile devices.
The two companies create a wide-ranging deal covering chips and software for mobile devices.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
- by Ingotian June 24, 2009 1:51 AM PDT
- Two key battles. First Intel with x86 vs ARM, second Nokia vs I-phone and G-phone. An intel-Nokia alliance gives Intel a chance of stopping the ARM becoming the de facto standard of the Smartphone space and Nokia have the mobile phone market share and desperately need something as Unix attacks Symbian. It's rather like micros in the early 80s. There were many but eventually a hardware open architecture prevailed, not because it was best but because IBM was behind it and it let many people build clones. Logically if that repeats itself the G-phone should win out and I'm sure that is not lost on Intel and Nokia. If the G-phone had a USB keyboard and VGA out it would replace my EEEPC that is based on the Intel Atom - soon I won't need a desktop. ARM doesn't run Windows and there are far more phones than Windows computers in the world. Intel have a lot tied into x86 and tat market could soon be in decline if it doesn't getinto the smart phone space.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)