Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Kevin Jonas Wedding News!

Comments on: Report: Windows 7 Netbook price tied to size

Intel is on the record with size limits for Netbooks, and Microsoft may tie this to Windows 7 pricing, according to reports.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (29 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by cvaldes1831 May 26, 2009 10:38 PM PDT
Maybe they should just charge by weight.
Reply to this comment
by sharmajunior May 26, 2009 10:57 PM PDT
Then that means, professional business laptops and high end gaming machines would have a hella expensive license.
by cvaldes1831 May 26, 2009 11:45 PM PDT
Sure, someone has to pay for it. Actually, the big corporate servers would owe the heaviest sums. Or the price could be capped at a certain amount.
by Mweaver2k9 May 26, 2009 11:05 PM PDT
Wow, that's just....absurd
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 May 26, 2009 11:17 PM PDT
It is?

Who the hell buys a 11inch netbook? You might as well get a laptop.

They are trying to save there own ***** so they don't have oems purchasing netbook licenses then using them on laptops.
by TheReaperD May 26, 2009 11:41 PM PDT
The distinction is ridiculous. All this is for is to try and artificially preserve the $1000 laptop. This, as all artificial barriers to innovation, will eventually fail.
by assman May 27, 2009 12:09 AM PDT
You're saying it's absurd because you're programmed to dislike anything Microsoft does, even when they are lowering prices for you. Wow. How about you back up your opinion..
by Seaspray0 June 1, 2009 1:16 PM PDT
@ReaperD. The average price for laptops is below $1,000. Some estimate the average price to be in the $700 range. There are not many people purchasing a laptop that costs over $1,000 these days. I doubt restricting windows 7 starter to 10.5" displays and smaller is going to have much effect on a $1000 laptop.
by assman May 27, 2009 12:08 AM PDT
Makes sense. Allows for netbooks to be cheaper, and the lack of a limit on graphics hardware allows for more capable computers that can run Windows 7 properly and play microsoft games.

Microsoft is supporting netbooks by making the license cheaper, they could've just charged the same higher fee if they wanted to.
Reply to this comment
by Carion May 27, 2009 12:34 AM PDT
Yawn, double Yawn..... Who cares. Just buy what you want and install Linux.
Reply to this comment
by t8 May 27, 2009 1:53 AM PDT
The problem is that you end up paying for Windows anyway.
This should be illegal.
by sythara May 27, 2009 8:24 AM PDT
I'm running Win7Beta and Ubuntu on my netbook. Some stuff you cant do on linux, unfortunately. And Win7 works flawlessly.
by Vegaman_Dan May 27, 2009 8:51 AM PDT
@t8:

"The problem is that you end up paying for Windows anyway.
This should be illegal. "

Absolutely right. Unless it comes with OS X on or Linux preinstalled, then it should be considered illegal. Oh wait, I forgot OS 2/Warp... and BSD. Okay, unless it offers a choice of every single operating systme on the planet, then it should be illegal. Oh, and it should shoot candy out the SD card slot too.
by Dalkorian May 27, 2009 11:01 AM PDT
by Vegaman_Dan May 27, 2009 8:51 AM PDT
Oh, and it should shoot candy out the SD card slot too.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Candy can be hard and if fired out of the slot with sufficient velocity it might injure someone. No, it should shoot pudding out the SD card slot instead. No one has ever been injured by pudding!

:-D
by Seaspray0 June 1, 2009 1:21 PM PDT
It should shoot beer out of the SD slot and have Daisy Duke graphics on the cover.
by t8 May 27, 2009 1:56 AM PDT
Android could clean up the Netbook market at some point. It is also free.
Reply to this comment
by gerrrg May 27, 2009 2:20 AM PDT
I agree, but not until Donut comes out.
by ralfthedog May 27, 2009 2:19 AM PDT
Question, Is the software the same? If Microsoft is just charging more or less dependent on the size of the device, that is cool. If they have an ultra light version of 7 that uses less memory, and they are saying you can only run it on a computer that is this small, that is uncool.

If a user wants to run a less bloated version of Windows on a larger box let them.
Reply to this comment
by DrtyDogg May 27, 2009 3:22 AM PDT
That is what this is about, price and features. Basically if an OEM wants the 15$ copy of Windows then these are the specs the machine are limited to. They are still free to use the $45 copy if they choose and make the consumer happy.

I personally hope that the big names in netbooks choose to skip the home basic/starter editions since we have already seen there machines can handle Home Premium.
by Vegaman_Dan May 27, 2009 8:52 AM PDT
The code is the same and you could take any existing netbook installation and do an in place upgrade simply by buying the appropriate key from the OEM to unlock features of higher versions.
by gertruded May 27, 2009 4:03 AM PDT
Nothing more that monopoly restraint of trade. They may get away with it in the US where corporations control the government, but not else ware.
Reply to this comment
by sythara May 27, 2009 8:25 AM PDT
You don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.

You are not guaranteed a right by the constitution to buy a computer how you want it. You are guaranteed a right to have a choice whether to buy or not. You don't like it, don't buy it. Simple free market economy, which communists like you don't understand.
by hetzbh May 27, 2009 7:55 AM PDT
I smell... lawyers from the EU
Reply to this comment
by sythara May 27, 2009 8:26 AM PDT
Yeah that what we all need, more communists impeding the works of free market.

You don't have to use Win7, get linux or buy an apple. sheesh
by kwhsy82 May 27, 2009 8:40 AM PDT
I smell ... lawyers from Korea. Microsoft and Intel have both lost antitrust cases there.
I smell ... lawyers from Taiwan. From a 2008 article:
The [Taiwanese] government investigation into Microsoft will also look into complaints Microsoft is limiting consumer choices by restricting the availability of Windows XP on new PCs and whether or not pricing of Microsoft products is fair to consumers on the island.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan May 27, 2009 8:54 AM PDT
Let's see...

Intel has determined a netbook will not exceed a screen size of 10".

Microsoft has deteremined that netbook will not exceed a screen size of 10".

Sounds fair to me. Anything larger is a notebook. The entire point of a netbook is to have a small, compact unit that is low powered and has just enough to get the job done. Why would you want to put a large featured OS on a product that won't be able to make use of it? Doesn't make sense at all.

if this results in a lower per unit price for the OS to the OEM's, how can people be against that?
Reply to this comment
by ahickey May 27, 2009 8:56 AM PDT
My understanding is that WIndows 7 Starter only allows 3 applications to be run at one time. Now the with srewy pricig based on screen size and other spec type things this looks like good news for Linux.

The pricing mdoel does look mad. What valid justification can they provide for it being approprate.
Maybe something like CPU utilisation may be better, but everything else as far as I can tell is subjective.
Reply to this comment
by Dalkorian May 27, 2009 11:07 AM PDT
I saw an article here yesterday claiming they were considering getting rid of that 3 app limit, so my interpretation is this size limit will replace it. Even hating M$ as much as I do (I don't hide the fact that I *despise* the M$ plantation), this feels like a decent move for the consumer in general.
by NW-J May 30, 2009 1:06 PM PDT
Maybe Microsoft would like to tell Samsung that their NC-20 is not a netbook.
Maybe advise cNet also. (see review: http://reviews.cnet.com/laptops/samsung-nc20-silver/4505-3121_7-33573285.html).
Reply to this comment
(29 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Google's mobile hopes go beyond Nexus One

The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
• Photos: Unboxing Nexus One

Using your smartphone safely

faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement