Comments on: Report confirms AMD gains on Nvidia
The competitiveness of AMD's new graphics chips is confirmed by a report.
The competitiveness of AMD's new graphics chips is confirmed by a report.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Market research and aggresive tests have shown over and over again that ATI has performed better in recent years against NVIDIA. Looking at windows vista, NVIDIA caused over 70% of system crashes due to poorly drivers. Its true that ATI did have more problems with drivers in the beginning but their drivers are more stable now than ever. ATI drivers caused about 18% of crashes on vista and the remaining caused by Intel's GMA. Moreover, NVIDIA hid their flaws in their chipsets that shipped with Macbooks and iMacs which is a total disgrace. People today still have more problems with NVIDIA's chipsets than ATI chipsets.
ATI costs more. What does that mean? You get what you pay for, like a 2GB GDDR5 card 512Mb for about 400 bucks is not bad. Thats what its supposed cost comparing it to other cards of similar type and from different companies.
ATI semi officially, through support channels, confirmed that PowerPlay on current generation of Radeon 4000 cards doesn't really work. For 4870x2 they even introduced BIOS hack to turn down frequencies when the card isn't used in full-screen 3D mode.
As was established by fans, main power consumption problem and one of the main sources of heat is GDDR5 memory. BIOS tweaking of the RAM frequency brought idle system from total ~140W to total ~105W (as was measured on outlet). IOW, RAM alone in Radeon 4870 is sucking hooping ~35W.
Read on here: http://forums.techpowerup.com/showthread.php?t=67928 - scroll down to post with screenshots.
In my laptop, I have an ATI X1600 Mobility Radeon which is supported by WDDM 1.1 with the same 64-bit device drivers I used for Vista. Quite obvious who really does a better job here.
- by tipoo_ November 14, 2008 8:25 AM PST
- awesome, i hope they put that cash into R&D for their new processor architecture.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(14 Comments)