Comments on: Intel comments on chips in new MacBook, Nvidia win
Chipmaker comments on the processors used in the new MacBooks and Apple's use of Nvidia graphics instead of Intel's.
Chipmaker comments on the processors used in the new MacBooks and Apple's use of Nvidia graphics instead of Intel's.
There were plenty of e-book readers on display at CES 2010, but many question whether the market for such dedicated devices can support all the new entrants.
Photos: E-readers at CES
Vintage computer historians have long revered the Altair 8800. As it turns out, an unknown computer project at Sacramento State beat the Altair by three years.
Images: The first microcomputers
Brooke Crothers has served as an editor at large at CNET News, an editor at Dow Jones' Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, and a senior editor at InfoWorld. His CNET blog covers chip technology and computer systems, and how they define the computing experience. He also contributes to The New York Times' Bits and Technology sections. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Please note that Penryn processors are 45nm chips, Montevina is just a platform, not a processor. An apple cannot be compared with an orange.
In my opinion Intel showed grace and integrity with their comments.
- by i_made_this October 15, 2008 8:51 AM PDT
- I agree that Intel - still, a winner in Apple's line - showed grace and integrity with their comment that they'd work hard to "win back this business." Graceful comments aside, I don't really know what Intel "lost" - Intel's still very much "Inside" every Mac being built with their CPU's. This gives Intel another hardware, product cycle til they're ready to deliver to Apple the "Larrabee solution" - a theoretical date somewhere in the coming 12 to 24 months which Intel more or less shares with AMD's eta for their "Fusion" solution.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(3 Comments)Ironically, the only vendor which has been notable in its absence (at least, so far) in the new Apple product line is AMD's very well-received ATI 3000+ and 4000+ series discrete cards. If you go through the ATI full product line pages, you'll see certain of these cards being built for Apple's higher end 3D / CAD / Animation applications - so, I guess, if it's a "serious" card that's required, I guess we have to wait to see if Apple will offer ATI's 3800 series as replacement for the Nvidia's 9000 series (and ATI's next gen 4800 series as replacement for Nvidia's similar next gen 200 series - since neither have been mentioned by Jobs, it's pretty baffling for graphics professionals to stick by Apple - at least, from what Apple has shown and Jobs has touted so far - let's see what they stick in the rest of their high end laptops and the total desktop line). Maybe Jobs can recapture the attention of the graphics professionals who were at one time strictly Apple users because Apple was the only game in town back then. But no longer. As it stands and was further confirmed by this week's mainstream laptop announcement, I gather that Apple has gone to the back of the vendor line for this important market segment..