Comments on: Microsoft again delays Mac XML converters
The utilities, which convert Office 2007 file formats for use in Office 2004 for Mac, should have been ready more than a year ago, but now won't be available until late June.
The utilities, which convert Office 2007 file formats for use in Office 2004 for Mac, should have been ready more than a year ago, but now won't be available until late June.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.
Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Apple could be bothered to support Office's XML format _nearly a
year before Microsoft_ did on the Mac platform.
integrity? This is clearly a move to try and offset Apple gains by
using its Monopoly position with Office. I would blame the lack of
oversight on the Republican administration but it was Clinton's
who let them off the hook the first time and based on their
executive contributions to Obama's campaign we can't expect
much from it either. Oh well.......
integrity?"
But Bill Gates gives away zillions of his PERSONAL fortune to
charities! That atones for the MicroSoft sins :)
choice to an iMac even better. I've found Pages to be an excellent
word processing/publishing program and wish that I had not
wasted money buying Microsoft Office. I can definitely say that this
will be the last time that I upgrade a Microsoft product.
for you'. They won't get another penny out of me until the restore
VBA support in Excel
better Microsoft Office file format compatibility than Microsoft.
To wit, they still support VBAscript in their latest release, while
Microsoft does not. They'll probably also beat Microsoft to
supporting their own new file format, since Novell already has a
converter that's being integrated.
Don't bother buying from Microsoft anymore.
much because it doesn't currently support the OpenXML
document formats so you are still screwed if someone (in an act
of madness) sends you an OpenXML format document. There
appears to be limited support for OpenXML in OpenOffice for MS
Word but nothing much for the other applications.
This said, the converter software that Microsoft is making only
creates, in the case of Word, RTF files rather than standard Word
files. Apple's iWork 08 applications appear to offer the best
support for OpenXML outside of Office:mac 2008 but I almost
always encounter compatibility issues using the likes of Pages
and documents never look the same.
Personally, I'm still waiting for a good competitor on the Mac
that offers professional tools and runs natively. As good as the
iWork applications are (excepting Keynote, which is easily better
than PowerPoint), they just don't offer all the features that I
expect. Pages, for example, won't support a mixture of portrait
and landscape aspect pages in the same document and I often
need that.
Microsoft's proposed "open" standards?
They haven't even delivered my upgrade to Office 2008 yet, which
they originally promised to me by the end of January! Of course,
they told me they expected 10,000 people to take them up on their
Black Friday sale and got 50,000 takers instead. But how hard can
it be to print 40,000 more discs?
proprietary file formats? If Apple can do it in Pages and Numbers, why
can't MS?
This of course begs the real 800-lb gorilla question:
Why oh why oh why isn't there an open, established, enforced document
format for something as simple as spreadsheets, word processing
documents and the other business basics? 20 years from now we'll look
back at this period and laugh at how stupid things were.
Madness.
"IBM's OS/2 INCREASES MARKETSHARE IN BANKING SECTOR (the folks who control all of the cash...)"
Re: "OS/2 was designed for the mission-critical business environment, and has reliable protection and manageability built directly into the operating system. The level of satisfaction with OS/2 within the banking community is so strong that some of the world's largest banking organizations are furthering their commitment to OS/2..."
"The decision at financial institutions to standardize on OS/2 demonstrates the leadership of the OS/2 Warp family in this critical industry." Banks Look to OS/2 as Operating System of Choice..."
http://seds.org/~spider/os2/ibmpr.html
There are workarounds as people have listed. This does not appear to be news to anyone really.
- This isn't a problem
- by rcrusoe February 22, 2008 10:04 AM PST
- We've only received a small handful of documents in MS Open
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(12 Comments)XML since its introduction.
When one is received it is our policy to hit reply, send it back,
and tell them we only accept rtf, txt, and odf. Simple.
We still use MS Office 97 and 2000 because their hasn't been any
reason to upgrade. When we buy additional Wintel or Linux
computers they get OpenOffice. Most of our Macs use iWork, a
few have Office/Mac, and a couple prefer NeoOffice.
We still use MS products but they haven't been critical to our
operating for quite some time.