Version: 2008

Comments on: Antipiracy effort targets little guy

More than 90 percent of the Business Software Alliance's settlement revenue comes from small businesses, an Associated Press analysis finds.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Should be Obvious
by duerra November 26, 2007 2:24 PM PST
It should be obvious that the BSA's primary fine/settlement revenue would come from small businesses. Large businesses have too much to lose (and make more than enough money to begin with) to risk having unlicensed software on their machines. They also tend to have larger IT departments and policies in which the installation of licensed software or OS images is part of their standard operating procedures. I would be shocked silly if a Fortune 500 company got busted for a knowing and willing software license violation.
Reply to this comment
More likely
by amadensor November 26, 2007 3:43 PM PST
The fact that large companies have more lawyers.
View all 2 replies
It's not obvious at all...
by furball123A November 26, 2007 5:20 PM PST
Large businesses have too much to lose (and make more than enough money to begin with) to risk having unlicensed software on their machines.

You would think this...but there are plenty of large companies where it happens all the time. Have worked for several of them. Many of these offenders are in the IT department...along with execs who think it is their god-given right to do whatever they please.
Built in Anti Piracy Tech
by Renegade Knight November 26, 2007 3:25 PM PST
Built in anti piracy tech also thwarts legitimate use. Thankfully the EULA only makes the promise that the software is not fit for any particular use. That way when you can't use your word processer to process words because it won't work, they never said it would actually do that to begin with.
Reply to this comment
The solution:
by Penguinisto November 26, 2007 3:50 PM PST
Linux, Open Source software, and a strict company adherence to using only these.

Do that, and you can tell the BSA flacks to go fsck themselves when they show up at your door. :)

Otherwise? Who knows if you're truly in compliance or not... usually (as a small to mid-sized business), your options are to either buy way more licenses than you'll need, just in case, or to spend a ton of time and money (read: overhead) just to insure that you're constantly in compliance. You could of course buy "license servers" and the like, which of course cost you even more money.

/P
Reply to this comment
Ha ha ha!
by JonathanPDX November 28, 2007 10:28 PM PST
I like the part about the reward offered for ratting out your company. Ah, it's great to be in America, where the multitudes fall all over themselves worshiping the almighty dollar.

If software companies would structure their pricing a little more realistically, there would never be a reason to pirate software. Companies like Micro$oft charge ridiculous amounts for upgrades, even though much of it is simply repackaged code from the previous release with a few bells and whistles added. Make software affordable or else support the damn stuff like it should be supported...free. We're tired of paying for Bill Gates' and his cronies mansions by paying exorbitant prices for bloatware and crapware and fixes for stuff that should have worked in the first place.
Reply to this comment
by daveavery May 31, 2008 11:55 AM PDT
Like any other, software is a business and understandably needs have a model of distribution. There are innovations in licensing driven by SaaS and server virtualization but what the rest of the industry needs is a licensing that is both user friendly while also supporting the industry.
Reply to this comment
by johncella June 2, 2008 11:50 AM PDT
Software licensing is evolving. In addition to those dealing with server virtualization and multi-core processors, many companies are deploying strategies that address licensing challenges including license auditing, piracy tracking and viral software distribution.

There are some third-party licensing technologies that allow you to strike a good balance between controlling piracy and supporting casual sharing/viral marketing. My company uses SoftAnchor from Uniloc. Works pretty well, I'm told. Uniloc allows you to use the piracy data, graphically defined by region (country, continent, etc.) and throttle the licensing parameters to adjust for areas of aggressive piracy. This also allows the loosening of licensing restrictions in areas of lower piracy to promote viral product marketing and greater sales
Reply to this comment
(10 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement