Comments on: Who wins, loses with browser-less Windows 7
Microsoft's move to offer Windows 7 in Europe without a browser could help rivals and mean some added bucks for PC makers, but are consumers getting a raw deal?
Microsoft's move to offer Windows 7 in Europe without a browser could help rivals and mean some added bucks for PC makers, but are consumers getting a raw deal?
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.
Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.
Add this feed to your online news reader
If Microsoft had a version of Windows where it specifically mentioned that it was for applications that only Microsoft allows, then they might have the right to say "NO!".
This is why web-based services are becoming more popular, because the owner has almost full control of what the users can do.
Look at things like Oracle 10g (looks like they have an 11 now), fantastic service, but totally out of your control, outside of entering in some SQL and managing tables.
(Ah Oracle exam, that was fun.)
Microsoft are researching this route, if i remember correct.
Bare-bones OS that handles everything from a remote location, but for your average media-rich person, it might not be such a good idea at the moment until all the internet pipes get upgraded, they are already getting pretty clogged as it is.
The "E" versions will probable be as un-successfull as the prior versions of Windows that shipped without Media Player (The "N" versions). Customers didn't want it and didn't care, only the EU government and the rivals of Microsoft did. Anyone who says this was in the best interest of the consumer knows that's BS. Browsers are free, there's no real winning or losing here except for the braggin rights. There was never anything preventing people from installing alternative browsers if that's what they wanted.
If we are going to attack preloaded software than why not the movie programs in Windows and Macs, don't they compete with other video software? What about picture viewers, or every other piece of built in software that makes either Mac or Windows superior to Linux for the user that doesn't want to worry about finding every program they may need. Apple should take this as a warning, Microsoft is a big target, but even they could get hit in the future.
Chrome being an ideal flagship trojan horse to get more google into user desktops I certainly would.
E is for the EU / Euro version sans browser?
WHY isn't E for Everybody in the world? Now that the genius at Microsloth has figured out how to surgically extract IE from Windows ( US DOJ anti-trust trial under oath testimony by Citizen Gates swore that this was "impossible to do without making Windows inoperable..." ), why then isn't Win7 E going to be the de facto Windows OS?
Upon install the USER who paid for Windows OS will be the final choice in the free market & NOT the software monopolist Microsith.
Q : Do you wish to connect to the Internet? Y
Q: Would you like to choose a Windows compatible Internet Browser to download? Y
Please choose one of the following browsers :
A. Opera / B. AOL / C. Netscape / D. Safari / E. Firefox / F. Chrome / G Internet Explorer /H. etc.,etc.,etc.......
THEN we would also know WHICH Browser is the most popular by choice of the customer & not based on Browsers SHIPPED, or de facto very hard to remove browsers like IE from Windows by Microsoft.
Good for Europe, but not good enough for the USA Mr. Ballmer?
Of course this is absurd, I'm trying to make a point. Americans need to realize that the EU is in an economic war with the US. They will keep punishing Microsoft, Boeing, Intel, Cisco, US Pharma, etc. just watch its going to get worse... I don't say boycott EU products, I mean what EU products are there to boycot anyway... :). Let the flames begin....
>>"It's definitely regulation gone wild and it's not going to help the consumer."
Completely agree.
Impact of removing IE on self upgrade is likely not going to keep EU happy either. Probably they'll sue MS again for not providing an easy option in the OS to download some browser :)
Wise way to spend the money they got from MS is to provide free CD-ROMs with browsers installed to all EU customers.
- by ChottuKhanna June 12, 2009 4:14 AM PDT
- This is the craziest piece of legislation that I have seen coming out of the EU. Do they want to protect consumers or their own software companies. If I buy windows, I want a browser with it. If I buy the Apple OS - I want a browser to come with it. If windows ships with IE- so be it. I can always change to another one. However, if I have no way to connect to the internet because the pc came without a browser- then I am stuck
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by arifsaha June 13, 2009 8:43 AM PDT
- You are mistaken; EU did not forbid Microsoft to include browser! Instead EU told Microsoft to give customer choices of browsers.
- Like this
-
Showing 3 of 6 pages (298 Comments)Very few people buy an operating system on their own - its normally with a new pc. If they want a browser other than IE, then why dont they ask their pc supplier - instead of creating problems for the millions of others who are quite happy to use IE.