Comments on: Who wins, loses with browser-less Windows 7
Microsoft's move to offer Windows 7 in Europe without a browser could help rivals and mean some added bucks for PC makers, but are consumers getting a raw deal?
Microsoft's move to offer Windows 7 in Europe without a browser could help rivals and mean some added bucks for PC makers, but are consumers getting a raw deal?
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.
Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Now clearly this is Microsoft playing hardball with the EU, but only in response to the EU playing hardball with Microsoft, who were responding to MS engaging in legitimately anti-competitive behavior in the original IE vs. Netscape browser wars. This was a completely avoidable set of circumstances for both the EU and MS, and in the end the consumers (the only innocent party here) are going to be forced to suffer.
The EU should never have ruled that including a browser in a modern OS was a no-go but MS shouldn't be playing entirely innocent either: the EU was reacting to some of Microsoft's past behavior. Both parties are completley in the wrong here. Microsoft could include Firefox, Chrome, Opera and Safari in addition to IE with W7, but decided against it. And the EU shouldn't have been so bone-headed and stubborn in their ruling.
My question is: who will be the first party to turn away in this game of chicken. Someone's going to have to give in here.
;)
Because they really would be stupid to do such a thing.
Tom
http://www.taphilo.com
haha!?
As if someone tech savvy is going to know how to use a FTP client.
maybe MS should include elinks (commandline browser).... haha!
@ monkeyfun14
Who says you need to?
It can easily be done in the background, all the user needs to do is click a nice little icon.
IE is built into win7, so you just open any Folder and type in www.firefox.com into the address: and go from there...
But it isn't, not anymore.
IE has been removed from Windows core.
All that remains is the mshtml executable. (which IE uses, Winamp, Explorer, and quite a few programs.)
And to be honest, i would prefer this. (alongside a decent package manager)
I rarely use 30% of the features in Windows, and deleting them is a massive headache if you have to do it often.
Yes, you could create a script to erase them, but you shouldn't need to.
Microsoft already partially had a service that would identify unknown file types and suggest programs to use.
If they actually went this route, it would be fantastic, for them and us.
They could actually offer hosting space to 3rd parties for programs as well, they could sell programs on behalf of other companies, with some share going to them for hosting.
They get money for hosting, they get everyone off their back, and we have a lovely package manager to manage our programs.
Please steal my idea Microsoft. You already have the base of this system as far back as XP. (not sure if it was in 2000... i think it was)
This has nothing to do with antitrust anyways, It's just the EU and another countries shaking down MS/INTEL and so on. Everytime these country's get into debt they slap a anti-trust lawsuit on them and shake the global piggy bank for more cash.
there should not be text editor since it's a apps...
there should not be a modem dialer...cause 3com wants it.
no media player....cause real player
no calculator....cause casio or TI want that business.
no games...cause EA want to sell them theirs.
no browser...because of another monopoly google.
no search engine...becaue of google again.
no anti virus or firewall ...cause symentic wants it.
no zip...cause of winzip etc.
no outlook express or outlook cause may be google want to sell you google mail or yahoo mail ?
no harddrive partition apps...
no usb drivers...
no paint...caue coral want to sell you coral draw or photoshop.
no pdf reader..
no messenger..
no everything...
just sell you a core compiler...
wait a minute...how come linux and apple o/s has all the above plus some extra?
EU is just a bunch of Euro trash.
EA don't sell solitaire or minesweeper, in fact I don't think anybody does
one of the reasons why the browser was allowed dot be tied to Windows is cos it also ties Ms's search engine too.
As for desktop search EU already had SP1 change so it could allow Google Desktop to run properly
Windows has no inbuilt AV, and Firewall I think they were told to put in.
Windows don't open .rars or .7z's so you still need a separate one for that.
Win7 doesn't have Live Mail, Messenger, photo gallery or many other's installed by default, its a separate package now, has been for a while.
Partition editors are kinda core to an OS than other stuff, even then it's only basic, I still find myself using Gpart or SwissKnife.
Drivers are third party
Paint n Photoshop aren't in the same league, if they bundled something capable of Photoshop levels then the'yd be in trouble
Windows has never had a PDF reader
Once again Messenger isn't on by default since Vista. Its all part of the Live Apps thing
As for why Linux is exempt look a few comments up, and for Apple I have no idea, I believe its cos they are an OEM, so have full control. Like Dell is allowed to install its Dell Dock thing, cos its an OEM.
they stop making new version and re-cycle same junk look prettier.
blam it on themselves.
This is a long running, 15-year pattern of tying things together to protect product share and the DOJ doing nothing.
EU should instead make PC makers sell PCs with Windows optional, because that is the root cause. The customers can then choose the OS either preinstalled or as an installation disc. All modern OS come with a browser. This way, there will be a) no Microsoft monopoly in OS, b) no monopoly in browser c) Microsoft might actually make IE better and make versions for Linux and Mac
Now that I think about it, it should apply the same rules to Apple. People should be able to purchase hardware and software separately. EU should also force Apple to make OS X installable on any hardware. won't that be fun
netbook started as all linux...but 98% people choose windows even when they have to pay more.
check dell and hp's website...
they sell the same netbook on both linux and window but still 98% market is now xp's
blame that on users don't want to learn new tricks .
if MS don't give free software like media player or browser, they will never brave enough to go buy one to try one.
Spending extra money is not in people's nature.
free software beats everything.
about apple.
just like you buy a cell phone. it comes with what software it has...you cannot make nokia phone to have to work with iphone software...
your samsung VCR don't have to run sony program...
it's bull
Your comment about Apple doesn't make sense. You can's apply the reasoning of a VCR to a computer. They are very different devices. VCR is designed to do only one thing. If Samsung VCR came with Sony "software", it would still play tapes, nothing more. Computer on the other hand is a different device. It's multifunctional. You can buy different hardware and software combinations.
It is like throwing dust in someone's eyes if you were racing them at the Olympics, breaking someone's car before a race, etc.
There are laws in business, and they broke them countless times and have gotten away with it for years.
Microsoft aren't the only company who do this though, but they are certainly one of the biggest, and they reach all around the world with their "godly" arms and lock people in, every year.
then everyone has to not bundle.
I am not blaming MS for giving us so much software for free over the year.
.or else we still stuck at the stone age with IBM dos interface with only FTP for file transfer etc.
I think over the year, MS has introduce the whole world so much more way to do everything.
"
if the biggest car company decided to give you free car ..would you take it?
it's not like they hike the price much (including inflation).
I think you are getting a better and better deal on each window verison.
so what's to complain?
>if the biggest car company decided to give you free car ..would you take it?
Not really, because i would know what they are trying to do to their competitors.
Being 100% serious here.
Chances of that happening are almost nil, though.
But i can see where you are coming from.
Plus, i don't rely on cars anyway. :)
It's also why i wouldn't shop at Walmart, because i know the kind of dodgy things they have done to defeat competition.
A friend told me what happened in his town to a shop that was across from a newly opened Walmart, Walmart lowered prices to a big loss, other shop died off, then they raised them again. (not instantly, over time)
I would actually prefer a computer without IE. I totally hate it and it is unsecure. My other issue with it is that to do updates on Windows even if the default internet program is set to Firefox, you are required to use IE to do the update.
Oh, for Ghu's sake, Forrest Gump! When AOL was the primary way for Amercians to get on the Internet, was there ever a problem getting an AOL CD or floppy? No! and if Opera, Firefox, Chrome, etc. want Europeans to use their browsers, you can bet there will be millions of install CDs flooding the checkout stands in Paris, Frankfurt, London, and the Isle of Man.
It's all about choice, and Microsoft is making sure that by sticking to the letter of the settlement, rather than the spirit, that the consumer gets no choice at all.
Great marketing there, guys... But then, Microsoft's business strategy has always been about maximizing profits at the expense of the customer. This tactic surprises me not at all.
- by cosuna June 11, 2009 1:58 PM PDT
- Hello Ina Fried FUD machine. Sponsored in part by Microsoft Bill and Steve.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 6 pages (298 Comments)