Comments on: Apple bashes Windows 7, talks Snow Leopard
As part of the WWDC 2009 keynote, Apple's Bertrand Serlet takes a few swipes at the competition and talks about the next version of Mac OS X.
As part of the WWDC 2009 keynote, Apple's Bertrand Serlet takes a few swipes at the competition and talks about the next version of Mac OS X.
There were plenty of e-book readers on display at CES 2010, but many question whether the market for such dedicated devices can support all the new entrants.
Photos: E-readers at CES 2010
Vintage computer historians have long revered the Altair 8800. As it turns out, an unknown computer project at Sacramento State beat the Altair by three years.
Images: The first microcomputers
During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.
Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.
Add this feed to your online news reader
The reason why it's safe now is because it's like the PS3-it doesn't understand the programming language of the virus so it just kicks it out. You can purposely install a virus and it won't know how to read it. However, without a doubt, Apple will have to open their computers eventually for 3rd party apps just like they have done for iphone with the growing users (I am one fo them). Once they do that, yeah I'll agree Apple is nicer but until then (highly unlikely), you need Windows.
Why do you think people always install Windows on their Mac (I do this myself too). Also, games are better on Windows OS. While I love my Apple Macbook Pro, it simply sucks without having a dual boot with Windows OS.
Windows 7
-Not NT 7 but NT 6.1, THEORETICALLY making it Vista MkII.
-Runs great (especially on a Macbook *Mid 2007* like the one I have), runs 2x as fast as Windows Vista.
-Easier to use than Vista SP2.
-Support for Legacy apps with XP Mode.
-Refined Aero interface
-Still 32 bit. (Yes, I know a 64-bit version exists)
-CUDA, DX11 support.
Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard
-New kernel designed specifically designed for the x86 instruction set.
-Fully 64 bit, compatibility mode for previous 32 bit apps.
-Grand Central Dispatch, OpenCL improve perfomance.
-Not a service pack. There are no security updates whatsoever.
-Security is improved, though, with all of the major applications (including Safari) built in running specifically on 64-biaccountt.
-Just refinements for performance on Intel.
-No PowerPC. Universal Binary is still supported, though.
http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/01/16/road_to_mac_os_x_snow_leopard_64_bit_security.html
Re: "Here we are in yet another flame war."
My sentiments exactly. Thank you for putting my exact thoughts into such a concise statement. If only everyone took your advice, we wouldn't have the need for these superfluous debates.
My name is Luis and I'm a Linux PC. Though I have nothing against Apple, only against its users' condescension...and their stupidity. Oh there I go again, adding fuel to the fire...screw it, Apple sucks!
"Flame on fellow nerds!"
"You Windows weenies really hate it when someone who has switched tells it like it is don't you? I mean come on, have any of you Bill Gates loving bunch ever actually used a Macintosh in the past year? 99% of the time, you haven't seen one since 1995 (or one made in 1995). Do yourselves a favour and try a Macintosh. I can't really blame someone that tries one, gives it a fair chance and then says "Eh, it's not for me". Hey, you at least tried it. But these imbeciles that keep saying stupid stuff like "Macs suck" and pulling out arguments that haven't been even arguably true for 20 years is getting really old. Most of us Macintosh owners have owned and or been forced to use Windows computers at one time or another. How many of you Windows shills have ever actually used one as their main machine?"
Nagging and insulting a user base is not the f*cking way to convert them. God, quit being fanboys, MS, Mac, Linux. Who gives a flip. You make your own companies look like idiots. And you too. Let someone make their own choice.
no "CrApple" "M$" or any of that stuff
All of you are retards whining about Mac LInux or Windows is better.
THEY ALL HAVE BENEFITS AND DRAWBACKS.
I use a Mac, but that doesn't mean you trash talk about Vista or Linux.
Windows has its own benefits, in a way its perfect for businesses for drawing up excel spread sheets and that sorta thing.
Mac is good for various types of artists and keeps our lives from going into boredom :P.
Linux is ummm, well Im not sure but I heard it was good for sound systems for theaters. OH YEAH ITS FREE!
Anyway, they all have their drawbacks
You people are just wasting your time yakking over nonsense. These three systems will always be different and I mean it ALWAYS different in purpose and structure.
SO go back to your lives (even though it might be ****) and lift the damn economy up.
Dang i should do that to :)
I have an iMac and OS X and a laptop with Windows 7 RC. They both have their place.
The end.
WHO CARES IF YOU USE MAC OR WINDOWS, JUST USE WHAT YOU LIKE OR NEED AND STOP BASHING THE OTHER
NERDS
NIck
It mostly patched holes in the UNIX core.
Quiet , they don`t want you to know...but it is a fact !
Just get over it..if you think mac is good use it, if you think pc is good use it. If you are used to it, then whatever. I have used Windows an OSX and I like Windows more, but seriously whatever.
Microsoft will still come up on top.
- by Mach1_8 June 10, 2009 8:46 AM PDT
- I'm pretty sure Bertrand also said several times that they "love Leopard". I'm certain you won't here anyone from MS saying they "love Vista". Big difference.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 4 of 6 pages (362 Comments)