With the release candidate of the operating system, Microsoft added an option to stream media over the Internet from a home PC. CNET News' Ina Fried found it useful, albeit with some limitations and caveats.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
About Beyond Binary
During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.
Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Beyond Binary topics
Then again.. there's always Linux.. lol
Heck even all the once-Linux apps like VLC made their way to the other platforms. Anyways windows 7 looks like a big leap from xp (I don't count Vista because it's such a pos). Right now I get this same functionality by using VLC with these sites:
http://www.hulu.com
http://www.tvshack.net
http://www.freetubetv.net
http://www.dailymotion.com
http://www.youtube.com
Looks are meaningless.
Please expand what you're talking about. I use OSX also but don't know how to stream content from one machine to another across the Internet. Yes, I can login to the machine, find a file and play it remotely, but this is not streaming.
I still miss a couple of things from XP beta that was removed in XP retail.
Kinda sad that they make our mouths water for it only to remove the feature.
This is akin to some movie trailers. Prime example is Mr. Bean the movie. In the trailer it shows Mr. Bean butting heads with the queen. The head butting was removed from the acutal movie.
Other movies have done similar antics and makes me wish I never saw the movie... "bait and switch" is the correct terminology.
And why do you think it will be removed? That's just your assumption and yet you already complain about it...
As jbolsen pointed out, you're just making blind assumptions because there's not much to actually complain about.
Many of those features have not been released, yet have been available elsewhere for years, and even decades.
MS innovation in action.
Long story short, the stuff I have right now doesn't require this radical surgery of my existing home network. Why does Microsoft require that I park their OS on all parties just to do, well, what I can already do right now.
As a side note, my guess is that the player application makes use of libraries only found on windows 7. We'd need to take a closer look at the streaming and authentication methods but it may be possible to develop a platform agnostic application that can make use of the server stream.
Replacing all of the OSes on the home network with Windows 7.
"We'd need to take a closer look at the streaming and authentication methods but it may be possible to develop a platform agnostic application that can make use of the server stream."
It is already possible (one quick peek at sourceforge for media streaming apps and libraries should produce a treasure trove of results)...
--
"This feature is for the masses"
It really isn't all that hard for the average person to set up a streaming server... lots of them are drop-easy to install. Take a peek along here: http://freshmeat.net/search?q=media+streaming+server&submit=Search (and note that most of them are OS-agnostic, which means you can run them on any operating system you like).
Anyway, I don't think anyone would argue that you would install Win7 just for this feature. Its an add on. Just like no one would install OS X just to get omnigraffle, No one is going to install Win7 *just* to get this.
As for looking on sourceforge, thats a reasonable idea but until we understand the underlying protocols in use those libraries won't be of much use. We can't put the cart before the horse after all.
Easy way to keep it secure.
I believe the LiveID is verify that you actually should have access to stream the media contents from that computer. Remember, the server is just going to be sitting there listening for incoming connections. If it just let anyone view the media collection that would be bad so some sort of authentication is needed. Now, being that a lot of people set up their computers so that you don't need a password to log in you can't rely on that method. So using LiveID makes a lot of sense in this situation.
There have been many many solutions for sharing your media over the internet for a very long time both free and paid.
Yes, that's undoubtedly corporate firewall or security appliance port blocking. It may have been the service itself, or the ID system -- the details of your experience there would be interesting and, perhaps, telling. Microsoft certainly wouldn't (and shouldn't) run the streaming service on standard service ports (80, 21, etc.), meaning that many users will also have this problem, even from some public hot spots or networks, hotels, etc., and on some ISP wireless networks.
Things I'd like to know about this:
- It would be interesting to know which service ports and protocols they are using. If this features isn't cut from the final release, they'll be deluged with such complaints about the corporate network scenario you described, even from some public locations, and will have to work with network providers on those details.
- Is the stream encrypted? That could be a major factor in performance and, therefore, user experience. I can't imagine Microsoft unleashing this without some form of stream encryption. Coupled with the Live ID requirements, it would be the moral equivalent of DRM, and would be all that would prevent capture of someone's personal media via simple sniffing and ripping techniques.
Slingbox does some really smart stuff in the bandwidth management area. It will take microsoft a bit to get up to that level. Being an appliance gives sling box a leg up also.
On the other hand... YAHOO offers video streaming now, for free... and i recall some free tool called NETMEETING?
the limitations of ITUNES have been noted multiple times!
I already do this on my mac.. and have been doing it for a long time... just in a slightly different way. Every Mac comes with Apache web server and FTP... I use this to access my files remotely... it took (literally), 2 mouse clicks to set up.. and I can access the files from anywhere... with any OS...
Just get Sling Player & it will work, not some lame wannabe from Microsloth.
- by FearNo1 May 15, 2009 12:10 PM PDT
- Would be nice if MS makes an iphone app to stream stuff to...but I won't hold my breath on that...
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by rapier1 May 15, 2009 1:16 PM PDT
- Can you get LiveID in an iPhone app?
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (80 Comments)