Version: 2008

Comments on: Microsoft wants Office 14 to get along

As part of designing the next Office, Microsoft is supporting more standards and trying to make the software fit better with back-end business software.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (66 Comments)
by kojacked March 5, 2009 12:37 PM PST
Yet another article proving it's all about vendor lock-in and lack of support of standards for Microsoft these days. I'm so glad they're sticking to proprietary, unpublished file format, ignoring the web, and avoiding other platforms at all costs. Oh wait...
Reply to this comment
by aMUSICsite March 6, 2009 2:49 AM PST
Talking about all those previous proprietary, unpublished file format... Will it be able to open the 500 million different office formats (including the Mac one's) since it's birth?
by kojacked March 6, 2009 12:47 PM PST
500 million? I think you need to go back to school and learn how to count. How are your ABCs, BTW?
by Mark_Anderson March 7, 2009 2:20 AM PST
Business doesn't care about multiple standards. We have one already - it's called Office.

Hey, it's not fair but that's reality and why every other major office suite has to make sure it's compatible with Office, not the other way round.
by Maccess March 7, 2009 7:04 PM PST
@mark_Anderson

Unfortunately, the newer versions of MS Office, don't support the older Office formats very well. Instead they support .docx and have spotty support for the older formats. OpenOffice.org has better support for older MS Office documents than newer MS Office versions, so its either install free OO.o or go hunting for available licenses for older MS Office, or exercise downgrade options for newer MSO. Actually, I just install OO.o on everything, regardless of whether or not there is an MS Office installation since it's pretty good at document conversions, opening corrupted documents, and creating .pdfs
by Mark_Anderson March 8, 2009 3:20 PM PDT
Sorry Maccess but that's nonsense.

Office 2007 supports previous Office versions, it's just the default is set to docx. OO in no way has better support for Office
by alflanagan March 5, 2009 12:37 PM PST
Wow, they're actually documenting what they're doing? That's radical. Next they'll actually be fixing bugs, or improving performance. Wait, I'm getting carried away again...
Reply to this comment
by MPB March 5, 2009 1:05 PM PST
ha ha ha, yes you are.
by ITtest March 5, 2009 1:14 PM PST
Ina, quick question. After looking at your bio I am currious how changing genders is a qualification for being a reporter for IT. The rest of your information is valid but I do not see why we need to know your personal life in order for you to validate your qualifications for your position.

Just wondering?
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 March 5, 2009 1:26 PM PST
What does it matter to you?
by slecalvez March 5, 2009 3:29 PM PST
It absolutly doesn't matter, I agree. Glad for her! But I understand the curiosity...why put it as part of a Bio... Anyway, I like her columns.
by dhavleak March 5, 2009 4:29 PM PST
My guess: It probably causes some interesting moments/scenarios in her life (possibly sometimes positive, but sometimes negative), so she probably made a decision at some point about being very open about it.
by artistjoh March 6, 2009 3:45 AM PST
I read a humorous few words that convey a sense of someone used to change and who is presumably open minded, and someone who is basically likable. To pick out a minor part of that for questioning says more about you than Ina, however. You are either so focussed on nit picky details that it is a worry, or focussed on gender change as an issue which troubles you (which is also a worry).

Ina is in the difficult position that being in the public eye as a reporter that if she is not up front about her lifestyle people criticize her for hiding things, and if she is open about it she gets criticized for putting it in people's faces. Your question might seem innocent to you but really these sort of questions can easily be offensive and unnecessary when Ina is lady enough to deal with it with a lighthearted mention in her bio and leaves it at that. It is then up to us to have sufficient manners to also leave it at that.

Meanwhile I will add that her honesty and candor in this subject is an important part of why I would regard her as qualified to report on any subject for any company. Not many reporters would show that much courage and that gives me confidence that what she writes on any subject will be frank and the truth so far as she knows it.
by hemanthesmart March 6, 2009 6:10 PM PST
@artistjoh

So true. Anyone courageous enough to reveal so much about her identity is going to be courageous enough to give us the (sometimes) ugly truth.
by ITtest March 7, 2009 10:36 AM PST
I understand that this should not be an issue. However I am not the one that broadcasts it in my bio. This is a technology news site. If you want to become a gay rights activist and news writer then may I suggest that you work for one of those publications? I noticed on your official site you discuss the gay rights march and various gender issues. Once again I ask how is this relevant for a Technology news site???? Please keep your political beliefs to venues that are fitting for your ideals.

I do not understand why as senior editor you would feel this is fitting. I could understand if this was a college news site or other non professional site. Please do not force your liberal ideas down our thoughts. Keep to reporting on the technology news.

I guess my next comments will be to the CEO of Cnet. As someone that pays to advertise on your site I will most likely be removing my account
by rapier1 March 8, 2009 6:05 AM PDT
You're an advertiser and and you are leaving comments in the blog to ask questions about editorial policy? If that's the case I'd really like to know in order to make sure that I never ever buy a single one of your products or services. Not because I disagree with your views (which I do think are atavistic and sad) but because you don't seem like a very smart business man and I wouldn't want to depend on you for anything

.
by sanenazok March 20, 2009 1:49 PM PDT
I also think that the gender change isn't any of my business. However, it was helpful to be aware of it before I saw Ina in a video at CNet since otherwise the gender issue would be distracting.
by kieranmullen March 5, 2009 1:17 PM PST
What new features do 75% of the user population actually need? OpenOffice.org is a great free open source office suite with many (not all) of the same or similar functions and you can open up and save as Microsoft documents for Word, Excel and Powerpoint.

So when it comes down to it. I can pay several hundred dollars extra for a few features I might need 10% of the time?

KieranMullen
http://360oregon.com
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 March 5, 2009 1:29 PM PST
Because sometimes people do need those features and when they do they're willing to pay for them. Maybe you don't see the need. Thats fine and its a great thing we have lots of choices. However, many people in the business world do need them. Anyway, the Office apps were never about writing a letter to grandma or making a sign for a lemonade stand. Hence the name 'Office'.
by tcr071 March 6, 2009 12:13 PM PST
Open Office is awful. I don't know what in the world people see in it besides the cost that would lead them to use it over MS Office. Not to mention Open Office literally has NO counterparts to programs like one note, access, communicator, etc and the "power point" application fails MISERABLY. If I want to get real business work done I'll get a copy of Microsoft Office Enterprise. If I want to type up a paper and print it off I'll download open office.
by Mark_Anderson March 7, 2009 2:21 AM PST
Open Office is very good for basic tasks. It's useless for business.
by Mr. Dee March 5, 2009 1:21 PM PST
Thats the problem, the storage model. It needs to be consolidated. Why do I need to have two storage locations Live WorkPlace and Live Skydrive? Why can't Mesh work in a way where a Word Doc can be saved to multiple lations simulataneously from with the application to my Desktop, Laptop (caching) and Skydrive so when I am not in front of either of my personal computers I can actually have access to my Office files any time, anywhere.
Reply to this comment
by hemanthesmart March 6, 2009 6:11 PM PST
SO TRUE. I hope they fix that. I'm using Mesh right now, but I can't access it online. If they interconnected Mesh, Live WorkPlace, and Skydrive, I'd be so much happier.
by Mister C March 5, 2009 5:33 PM PST
People still use M$ Office? WOW, I had no idea!
Reply to this comment
by Mr. Dee March 5, 2009 7:06 PM PST
Yes, they do, its on 500 million PC's, welcome to the year 2009.
by Mr. Dee March 5, 2009 7:07 PM PST
Yes, they do, its on 500 million PC's, welcome to the year 2009.
by tm_anon March 5, 2009 7:37 PM PST
Unfortunately, many corporations haven't figured out that there are better alternatives which are more compatible and cost no money.

Alternatively, there are also those corporations which haven't quite gotten up the nerve to leave MS products because of the large amount of lock-in involved with using them in the first place.
by kojacked March 6, 2009 12:50 PM PST
@tm_anon:

Or maybe people just like Microsoft Office. I know it's hard for a bigot like you to believe but think about it... oh wait..
by Mark_Anderson March 7, 2009 2:23 AM PST
No there aren't any realistic alternatives to Office for business because it's still the best package out there, has all the standard features and the best support arrangements.

Is this fair? Hell no! Is this reality? Hell yes.
by kieranmullen March 7, 2009 9:49 PM PST
After a medical office lost or could not produce their licenses for MS Office. I replaced their office applications with OpenOffice. I checked about 8 months later. They didn't know the difference, were happy using it and no other software was loaded on the computers.

KieranMullen
http://360oregon.com
by rapier1 March 8, 2009 6:09 AM PDT
If you were doing IT for a doctors office then you and I both know that most practices still haven't gotten out of the 80s in terms of IT. This is why EMR is such a problem and why a lot of place are still depending on scanning services to even approach it - let alone having a functional HL7 compliant implementation.
by t8 March 5, 2009 5:59 PM PST
Office 14. Wow, people still buy office?
Why?
Reply to this comment
by Mr. Dee March 5, 2009 7:07 PM PST
Yes, we can't stand incomplete, buggy, slow software like OO.org.
by tm_anon March 5, 2009 7:35 PM PST
@Mr. Dee

Funny. I was using MS Office at a neighbors house while helping with some document work. I use OOo at home so I have an actual basis for comparison.

MS Office opened more slowly and took longer to render documents.

As for bugs, maybe you could name some instead of just saying they exist.

What isn't in OOo that is needed for an Office setting? Again, you say it's incomplete but you don't say how.
by Mr. Dee March 5, 2009 8:15 PM PST
Maybe you need need to upgrade that PC from 32 MBs of RAM, this is 2009, not 1999.
by topgunb2 March 6, 2009 12:52 AM PST
@t8
Welcome to news.com

Instructions

1. There's menu on top to navigate around
2. Clicking a news item will open details
3. You can also create your very own personal account
4. blah blah blah

Start reading the news and you'll realize half a billion people uses office.
by rubenerd March 6, 2009 3:26 AM PST
@ topgunb2

Many people use Microsoft products such as Office at work because they don't have a choice. My father for example has had Office pre-installed on every machine. He uses it to open documents sent to him from other people, but he doesn't create anything with it.

This is why I'm always skeptical when people say there are XYZ number of a Microsoft product. Install base, people who are forced to use it, and people who choose to use it are 3 different things. I suspect that third number is much lower.
by quackadilly March 6, 2009 3:56 AM PST
tm_anon,

If your computer is opening office documents slowly, you need a new computer....seriously.

I have a 5 year old computer and a brand new one, both custom built, they open documents instantly.

Doing a "benchmark" test by feel is very invalid. Get some solid, verifyable numbers.
by Renegade Knight March 6, 2009 7:35 AM PST
1) Outlook
2) Outlook
3) We have to because of Outlook.
by ScorpioKing1990 March 6, 2009 9:43 PM PST
Okay I can't stand crap like this. Microsoft does not FORCE you to do ANYTHING.

I hate large corporations just as much as the next guy. But Microsoft is far from being an evil company. Saying that Microsoft is an evil company would be like living in the suburbs and saying you are afraid of getting shot. Could it happen? Yes. Is it going to? Probably not. As for Microsoft, are they greedy? Yes. Do they charge more than they need to? Yes. Welcome to the world of business, this is how you make money. But that doesn't mean that it isn't worth it sometimes.

You say that Microsoft makes you go to them as if you don't have any other choice. If you want to attempt making the same or better software and selling it for a cheaper price, go ahead. Nothing in this world is going to stop you. Consider that mabye, just MABYE Microsoft started out as a small company, with hardly any money, market share, advertising potential, etc. They didn't just start off being how they are today. They grew because people LIKED what they have to offer....and a lot of people still do. There are 5 or 6 different OSes that are worth their weight in salt, most of them are a lot cheaper than Windows. They aren't on a whole lot of people's computers though because they just don't compare to Windows in the same way. It's like the arguement that iMacs are more secure. Apple's OS isn't more secure than Windows....it's just targeted a whole lot less. The people who make viruses and the like WANT people's computers to get infected, as many as possible. That's the whole point of creating it. So if they want to infect as many computers as possible, they write it for Windows, not the Mac, because Windows has such a staggering market share. So the arguement that Apple's OS is more secure in that sense is kind of like throwing 7 rocks at one window and 1 at another and claiming that the 2nd windows is stronger and better because it didn't break as bad. It's complete and total BS.

So the moral of the story? You have options. You are a free peraon. You can use what you like. But you are not forced....and don't tell other people that you are when you are not.
by topgunb2 March 8, 2009 3:48 AM PDT
@rubenerd
The comment was to the question that people still buy office, they do, they don't have a choice or they do is a different question. BTW I use ubuntu and open office and i love it.
by michael_j_x April 6, 2009 7:34 PM PDT
I am a Linux user and use MS office through wine HQ. I really can't see what people are seeing to Open Office. Especially with regards to the spreadsheet program, it is decades behind Microsoft's Excel. Not to mention power point. And I really like the 2007 MS office UI, it follows the basic design principles, such as providing you with relevant tools for the current object you have selected (i.e. table format tools when you select a table, picture tools when you select a picture, you get my point). This coming from a company that had you clicking "start" in order to shut down, is a major improvement.
by jimmy88008 March 5, 2009 9:04 PM PST
Well, thank god to Microsoft opening OpenOffice docs. It really is a pain when I have to convert such. I have to admit though, there are several other severe problems with Microsoft Word, particularly in paragraphing and missing the Microsoft Script Editor, that I still use WordPerfect. I could go on and on about differences.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight March 6, 2009 7:35 AM PST
Amazing how 20 years ago WordPerfect did some things simply that nothing since has done anywhere near as well.
by dhavleak March 7, 2009 9:39 PM PST
Such as?
by brian.lee March 5, 2009 9:42 PM PST
New with Office 14!
30% more compatibility!


Disclaimer you'll still need Microsoft Office to view the other 70% of this document.
Reply to this comment
by massfat March 7, 2009 1:07 PM PST
That's why people like you can't run Microsoft.
by Mac OS XP March 6, 2009 12:09 AM PST
Somebody please tell me they're adding support for iWork formats like Pages and Keynote.
Reply to this comment
by aMUSICsite March 6, 2009 2:45 AM PST
Maybe they will do this the day Apple makes Pages support opening OO documents in Pages ;)
by rubenerd March 6, 2009 3:12 AM PST
Anyone could be forgiven for being very skeptical about this. Still, at least it's a step in the right direction.
Reply to this comment
by quackadilly March 6, 2009 3:52 AM PST
Wow.

Microsoft does something to help benefit the customer and still gets reamed......

People will find any reason to hate something.
Reply to this comment
by rubenerd March 6, 2009 4:04 AM PST
Let's just say they have a poor track record when it comes to delivering what they promise.
by Renegade Knight March 6, 2009 7:34 AM PST
Ok here's a bone. "Good job MS on finally supporting the Open Document format in a future release now that it's been adopted as an international standard for the past several years."
by massfat March 7, 2009 1:10 PM PST
Microsoft has an excellent track record of delivering powerful products. Unfortunately, they set their expectations too high. This is a horrible step in the WRONG direction. OpenOffice is completely useless, and there's been the TRUE Microsoft Word STANDARD that's been around for a long time. OpenOffice isn't a standard. It's just some crapware created by MS haters, and n00bs that can't stand having to use the real world standard.
However, congratulations to Microsoft for trying to meet their customers' needs.
by fooldog01 March 6, 2009 6:09 AM PST
Yay. Another comment section filled with remarks from biased tools.
Reply to this comment
by rubenerd March 6, 2009 6:50 AM PST
Yay. Another comment that added nothing of value to the discussion.
by Pank2008 March 6, 2009 7:24 AM PST
a company which brings a nice mix and mash of the virtual and the desktop is a href="http://www.hyperoffice.com">HyperOffice</a>. it offers web based collaboration and productivity tools (intranet and extranet workspace publishing, task management, calendaring, forums, polls, document storage and collaboration, contact management) and messaging functions like webmail, shared contacts/calendars/tasks. the cool thing is that it integrates with the desktop as well, as it allows synchronization with Outlook mail, contacts, tasks, calendars and its web folder concept allows you to manage online documents directly from the desktop.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight March 6, 2009 7:32 AM PST
One thing they need to fix is install friendlyness. Evertime I intall Office I have to call MS and get the unlock codes because of frequent computer changes. Worse they won't even let me buy more Office Software for yet more installs. It would be easier to just pirate enough copies to fill the number of installs I'm allowed.

It's pathetic when they make both buying, and installing the software a PITA.

OpenOffice isn't as nice but I don't have to beg to buy it, don't have to beg to get a product key, or phone home to activate it.
Reply to this comment
by massfat March 7, 2009 1:12 PM PST
That\s because you don't buy OO in the first place. If you're going to waste MS's time, make it worthwhile for them.
Idiots like you fill up the customer service demands so that real problem can't get through.
MS Office wasn't meant to install on 10 computers with one license. And MS office software is available easily at your local retail store. Stop BSing.
by sanenazok March 20, 2009 1:54 PM PDT
@Knight: I don't understand your problems...I guess you're trying to install Office 2007 on more computers than you have licenses. Strangely enough that's not allowed. I've never had a single activation problem in Office 2000 SP1 and thereafter. Same with XP/Vista activation. Also, as mass responded, you can buy all the licenses you need from anywhere.
by joeltom March 6, 2009 8:47 AM PST
I wish they would just give the user back some options they keep taking away! Why can't I choose the default select highlight color in Office 2007? What braniac decided they knew better what i wanted? Will they fix that in the next version? Maybe just once they could think about some people having poorer vision and wanting to make decisions on display options that might not occur to Microsoft? Every time I find an option I like, they take it away. Maybe someone could whisper "user options" in their ear a few times. If they stay down this road, Open Office is definitely in my future....
Reply to this comment
by JoeBuddha March 9, 2009 7:23 AM PDT
Speaking of upgrades, when are you going to junk the COM interface and embrace .NET?
Reply to this comment
by bbharani March 11, 2009 3:46 AM PDT
every article I see about Microsoft draws so many people commenting. This alone proves the company name. I personally feel MS products work really well. MS software has more bugs because hackers concentrate on most popular products. Every software has bugs and the they have to be fixed because software is made by humans.
Reply to this comment
by Jonnygthedrummer March 11, 2009 5:43 AM PDT
if ur in business u Buy office, its more powerful than almost anything

if ur not , an u just need to type a letter , make a simple spreadsheet , or watever , there openoffice
or google docs

i like good docs, i have office but havnt used to exp for business work, for my personal use i find google easier , its all web based an free ,its not powerful but it just works for wat i need,

PS, our company is dumping outlook (crashes too much an to slow) for a online service called planplusonline.com , they have a email client, cal, database, contacts....
Reply to this comment
by Jonnygthedrummer March 11, 2009 5:48 AM PDT
btw i dis like the ribbon , just keep it simple, File, Edit, Insert, Help ,,, not icon ribbon stuff
(dont fix it if its not broken)

but besides that office is good
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (66 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    Click Here
    advertisement