Version: 2008

Comments on: Microsoft invests in ads, multitouch

Despite searching for ways to tighten its belt, Microsoft is still spending in many areas. Its latest investments include a stake in a multitouch start-up as well as a new ad campaign aimed at businesses.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (34 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by  Brian January 12, 2009 10:58 AM PST
Micro$oft copies the Mac -- and in this case, it's the iPhone (multi-touch).

Give them time to eventually copy gestures (unless Apple has the patent protection).

There is a cheaper way for Microhooo to copy Apple -- just buy them out.

Funny thing, Microcrap can't even buy out Yahoo.

Micro$oft, if you can't beat 'em, buy 'em!
Reply to this comment
by rapier1 January 12, 2009 11:22 AM PST
Gesture based computing has been around for more than a decade. Probably longer but I don't feel like doing the research right now. Multi-touch has also been around for quite some time - the basic research goes back to the 90s.
by hafenbrack January 12, 2009 11:23 AM PST
Microsoft has not copied Apple with Multi-Touch. If you want to see the first public demonstration of Multi-Touch, Google Jeff Han and multi-Touch. in early 2006 he deomsonstrated the first TRUE multi-touch, not just 2 fingers, interface. If you notice, he has his workstation running on Windows.
by JasonCe January 12, 2009 11:28 AM PST
Please get your facts right.

Microsoft had multi-touch and gestures long before Apple, and any other company. In fact, Microsoft is the biggest backer of touch interfaces. They have been pushing for touch for nearly a decade now starting with the touch capabilities of the first Tablet PC in 2001, also today in many different PCs and smartphones with many different form factors, and of course Surface:

http://www.microsoft.com/surface/index.html
by  Brian January 12, 2009 11:45 AM PST
I suppose Nintendo beat Apple to the market with the Nintendo DS (twin displays with the lower display as an interactive touch screen).

In the Matrix movies, we've seen the multi-touch in action as well as some Star Trek movies.

I suppose the technology has been there all along, but it was Apple that delivered the multi-touch along with the gestures in a much more substantial way.

If Microsoft can somehow deliver this multi-touch to video displays, that would be a very interesting technology.

BTW, at the NY Visitor Center in Manhattan (on 7th Avenue in Midtown), they have upgraded to multi-touch displays that resemble tables where you interact with the touch screen.

However, those tables are not consumer products, however, it would be interesting to see those technologies appear in other businesses.
by ballmerisanape January 12, 2009 11:48 AM PST
It matters who implements it first.. not who had it first. For example, Apple was the first to heavily rely on USB and Firewire... there is no doubt that it would have taken longer for those technologies to take hold if it were not for Apple.

Apple was the first to offer a multitouch platform to consumers. It's that simple. Apple was first to throw it out there... it has been wildly successful... and now that Microsoft sees Apple swimming comfortably, it's ready to jump in too... less afraid of the outcome.

Problem for Microsoft though... Apple is the hot model with the little bikini... and Microsoft is the balding, overweight 40 year old with abundant back and shoulder hair.
by rapier1 January 12, 2009 1:31 PM PST
@Ballmerisanape

The position taken by the OP was that Apple invented these things and MS was just copying them. That's pretty demonstrably untrue for these two examples. In fact, I'd generally argue that both companies end up copying quite a bit off of each other and other sources. That's how computer research works - people build off of each other's ideas. Was Apple first to market with some of these things? You bet. No one could deny that. That doesn't mean MS is copying them when they get to market with similar technology though. Especially when they've been engaged in parallel research for years before Apple went to market.
by smilin:) January 12, 2009 2:40 PM PST
Neither MS nor Apple invented multitouch
Neither MS nor Apple invented gestures

MS was actually first to market with multitouch in the form of the Surface.
by smilin:) January 12, 2009 2:41 PM PST
BTW genius... Buying them IS beating them.
by random truth January 12, 2009 6:13 PM PST
I think the only things that apple created and patented relating to multi-touch is the capacitive multi-touch screen and the firmware on the broadcom chip that interprets multi-touch data. If your board read an article about how the iphone screen is designed differently than other touch screens.
by ballmerisanape January 12, 2009 6:39 PM PST
smilin:) ... your kidding about Surface.. right? When was the last time you saw someone in the subway with a Microsoft surface... seriously. I'm pretty sure that doesn't count in the "available to consumers" category... lol.

rapier1, ... I was replying indirectly to all of the posts citing obscure trivia facts regarding the origin of this and that.... None of that matters... what matters is who popularized the technology.....

I could dream up a cure for cancer... but if never do anything with it.. it's worthless.. effectively non-existent. It's the people/companies who take risks and implement new technology and paradigms that matter.. not the ones who sit around and cry "I thought about it first"... they don't matter.

Microsoft still doesn't realize that consumers are the future of computing.. not single-minded IT professionals and corporate types.. Computing is a consumer market now.. adapt or die.

Dell is finding out the hard way.. Hopefully Microsoft will not follow.. They have the resources.. lets hope they figure things out and do the right thing.
See more comment replies
by mbenedict January 12, 2009 11:34 AM PST
@brian:

Wired: "Multitouch technology itself is far from being an Apple invention. Jeff Han wowed the crowd at TED in 2006 with a demo of his multitouch research, and Bill Gates demo'd Microsoft's Surface Table in early 2007, months before the iPhone was released. Even Apple CEO Steve Jobs reportedly used Microsoft's work with tablet PCs as the jumping-off point for iPhone development."

http://www.wired.com/gadgets/miscellaneous/news/2008/02/multitouch_patents
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto January 12, 2009 11:43 AM PST
@mbenedict, JasonCe, hafenbrack, et al:

You're all wrong:

"In 1984 Bell Labs engineered a touch screen that could change images with more than one hand. The group at the University of Toronto stopped working on hardware and moved on to software and interfaces, expecting that they would have access to the Bell Labs work.

A breakthrough occurred in 1991, when Pierre Wellner published a paper on his multi-touch ?Digital Desk?, which supported multi-finger and pinching motions. [3][4]"

--and--

"In 1999, Fingerworks, a Newark-based company run by University of Delaware academics John Elias and Wayne Westerman, produced a line of multi-touch products including the iGesture Pad and the TouchStream keyboard.[5] Westerman published a dissertation in 1999 on the subject. In 2005, after years of maintaining a niche line of keyboards and touchpads, Fingerworks was acquired by Apple Inc.."

ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multitouch#Bell_Labs

...so kindly take your revisionist history elsewhere, please.

/P
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto January 12, 2009 11:45 AM PST
Oh, forgot to post the actual source of it all (from the same cite), though a citation would be needed for this bit:

"Multi-touch technology dates back to 1982, when the University of Toronto developed the first finger pressure multi-touch display. The same year, Bell Labs at Murray Hill published what is believed to be the first paper [citation needed] discussing touch-screen based interfaces."
by mbenedict January 12, 2009 12:38 PM PST
Show me ANY PART OF MY POST that's factually incorrect.

Dumb Apple troll.
by ducttape36 January 12, 2009 12:46 PM PST
while im not disputing any of your facts, never ever use wikipedia as a cited source. ever.
by Vegaman_Dan January 12, 2009 12:54 PM PST
I do believe Penguinisto's comments and source information is very likely to be correct, but using Wikipedia or any end-user editable site as a source as akin to quoting something you saw on a bathroom wall at the bus station.

It may be accurate, it may be worthwhile, but it cannot be trustworthy due to the location and control factors.

But I think his information has the gist of truth to it and is a bit more believable than anything else posted in this thread so far.
by rapier1 January 12, 2009 1:35 PM PST
I'm not sure anyone was arguing that Microsoft invented these things. So I'm not sure who or what you are trying to dispute. All you've really done is do the research I thought was too pedantic to actually bother with.
by Penguinisto January 12, 2009 4:57 PM PST
@mbenedict: you quoted a source as if it were a direct contradiction of Brian's post, presenting same as if MSFT somehow invented the multitouch technology (the Wired article did the same on a transitive note, which you carried through). Problem is, Brian was actually closer to being correct than you were (albeit he named the iPhone as the source instead of Fingerworks for the first commercial multitouch product - that said, Apple owns Fingerworks, and is thus the de facto and QED maker of the first commercial multitouch product).

Furthermore, I directly cited Bell Labs as the earliest verifiable academic source for multitouch as a concept... not Apple. So much for trolling on Apple's behalf, huh? In short? Stop weaseling and suck it down, fanboy... ;)

@ducttape36: I normally agree with you when/if the sources cannot be verified. However, in this case, the citations listed on the page are true. Bell Labs was the first verifiable academic source for multitouch, and Fingerworks (an Apple property since 2005) was the first commercial manufacturer of multitouch products.

@Dan: follow the citations - that's all you have to do. Belittle Wikipedia all you like (ad-hominem-by-proxy on your part?), but the citations they presented are quite real.

@rapier1: I'm just here to step on the FUD... even if it means having to wipe my shoes off on the doormat afterwards. Sorry if that disturbs. ;)
by Super2online January 12, 2009 5:10 PM PST
Penquinisto,

It does not take a genius to do a 2 second search on wikipedia, my 5 year old does it daily at home and in school. So please refrain from perpetuating your superior attitude on others while claiming like they are attempting to re-write history. My 5 year old mastered that kind of restraint over her younger brother last year. Besides, it only serves to highlight your true motives and personal issues.
by Vegaman_Dan January 12, 2009 10:34 PM PST
Penguinisto:

Professionals do not use wikis for their sources. The data is considered compromised by its very nature of free public editing. I would espect you to do the same if you want to be taen seriously. It's as simple as that.
by AppleSuxLeo January 12, 2009 12:12 PM PST
N-trig's technology is used in current multitouch computers from companies such as Dell and HP, a category Microsoft hopes to expand by building gesture support directly into Windows 7.

"With the introduction of multitouch in Windows 7, integrated with N-trig's DuoSense technology, our customers will have a new and natural way to interact with their PCs," Microsoft Group Program Manager Ian LeGrow said in N-Trig's press statement. "By simulating the way people write and touch naturally, N-trig is helping to make it easier to navigate your PC and enable a new class of Windows experiences."
Apple to many people`s dismay , didn`t invent multi-touch , they simply have a patent on their version of it.
BTW...Palm is up today again while everyone else is down. The Pre freight train keeps on rolling. Apple`s iPhone OS looks quite "Stonehenge" compared to the Pe`s WebOS. No wonder Jobs was a no-show.
Reply to this comment
by ppgreat January 12, 2009 12:45 PM PST
Didn't Apple do a commercial about this, something about shoving the pile of money over to more advertising?
Reply to this comment
by kojacked January 12, 2009 1:06 PM PST
And it was totally factually correct right down to the precise number of dollar bills used on the table in the commercial! Apple is so amazing! [cue angelic chorus]
by rhsc January 12, 2009 1:16 PM PST
and look at apple's advertising budget
by Penguinisto January 12, 2009 5:00 PM PST
@rhsc:

All fanboyism aside, if you would: Ad budgets are pretty big on either side, but considering that Apple's marketshare is rising while Windows' marketshare is not... who has the more effective use of their respective budgets, do you think?
by Vegaman_Dan January 12, 2009 10:42 PM PST
Penguinisto:

Thank you for your opinion and comments. It's good to have a dissenting opinion. You are also very good at spinning information in a very creative manner that is most humorous.

I like reading science fiction and fantasy and your comments are right up there with the best.
by topgunb2 January 13, 2009 1:30 AM PST
@Penguinisto, apple market share has no where to go but up!
by trd1282 January 13, 2009 1:47 AM PST
Come on topgun, you know very well apple has much room to fall. I hate this attitude that anything but complete global domination is failing.
by RompStar_420 January 12, 2009 1:11 PM PST
All I want to do is, bang, bang, take care of my name.
Reply to this comment
by teakilla January 12, 2009 5:36 PM PST
they need to fix vista so it will work better the vbest thang they can do is go back to microsoft windows and leave it alone
Reply to this comment
by MSSlayer January 12, 2009 7:04 PM PST
Marketing isn't going to solve any of their problems.
Reply to this comment
by kboateng January 14, 2009 8:46 AM PST
What's the point of this multitouch argument? The point is Microsoft has invested a lot more in the technology than Apple simply because they have more money. Second, when we look at tablet PCs and multitouch devices such as the iPhone/Windows Mobile phones...Microsoft's products debuted first and that's all that manners. The only multitouch item fromm Apple is the iPhone and it has been out for only a year and a half...tablet PCs with touch have been out for years....also the Surface came out months before the iPhone. That said they did not invent the technology, neither did. However, the implementation of it was on Windows platforms way before anything Apple had to offer because of the accessibility of Windows. What I don't understand is how Apple fanboys always think that just because Apple releases a product or makes it popular then they were the first out with it. The Prada phone came out before the iPhone but yet every all-touch screen phone is a bite out of Apple when they did not even invent the concept. The same goes for even touch screen MP3 players...the world does not revolve around Apple you know. Just 5 years ago the company wasn't even relevant until the arrival of the iPod so know your beginnings...and let's not forget about the hefty bailout Microsoft offered them.
Reply to this comment
(34 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement