Version: 2008
  • On The Insider: Miley Cyrus in Sex and the City 2

Comments on: Microsoft still pushing 'Apple tax' notion

Ahead of Macworld, top Windows marketer says consumers can't afford to go Mac. But with the economy in tatters, will people be buying any PCs other than Netbooks?

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 2 of 4 pages (220 Comments)
by Fire Balls January 5, 2009 1:51 PM PST
aaah apple.. yes the very closed predictable hardware platform. Making them the best target of hardware and BIOS derived viruses with complete platform penetration. If done right you could take down every Mac in the world that has an internet connection.
Reply to this comment
by Fire Balls January 5, 2009 1:56 PM PST
LOL oh yeah I forget to mention Apple doesn't think they need anti-virus software and a firewall.. well just disable that you don't need that pain in the rear... One day that wake up call will come... and it will be a very ugly day
by seven7dust January 5, 2009 4:49 PM PST
then how come Mac virus attacks haven't ever been reported after OS X

if it's so easy to make a virus then why don't people do it ???
and don't say small user base they r 10s of millions of mac users in the world

Macs may be many things but they r secure for sure !
by renec2006 January 5, 2009 1:52 PM PST
Ouch!!! I don't like MS either, but ouch! ; )
M$ don't like letting go of their power over the customers. We let them own us!
M$ is very sneaky! They stole the gui idea from Xerox!
M$ thinks we are stupid that 's what I don't like about M$.
Windows is a good OS and is used by 90%, but don't mean it's a great product!
Reply to this comment
by macsmarter January 5, 2009 1:59 PM PST
Hardware without decent software is a doorstop. Is as anyone talking FREE SOFTWARE? Any Apple owning pro-amateur who takes a lot of photos like I do, occasionally does movies, or mixes a simple home music jam or does an amateur website or has a kid who loves photo booth knows what I mean. WE DO NOT PAY a dime more for iPhoto, iMovie, Garageband, iWeb or Photobooth.
Add on Keynote, Pages, and Numbers which offer good standalone basics plus multi-media integration as opposed to a stripped down Office in Microsoftworks and we have real value in computing. For many the Mac packages are worth twice the PC packages with their anemic, badly integrated home software. Software is critical and people now know it.
Reply to this comment
by pithenumber January 7, 2009 5:42 PM PST
Free software, find it on the web
even better, a good bit of them are open src
by The_happy_switcher January 5, 2009 1:59 PM PST
What's the cost of the antivirus, antispyware, antimalware tax? Not too mention the numerous utilities one needs to get to keep the registry from bogging down the whole system after a few months. Windows maintenance is far higher than a Mac and that tax far outweighs the cost difference between a Mac and PC.
Reply to this comment
by D3vildog699 January 5, 2009 2:16 PM PST
AVG and Avira are Free.. so im not sure what you mean there...

CCleaner a registry cleaner.. free...... all available on this website for download.
by compudoc318 January 5, 2009 2:40 PM PST
all free right here.....lol
by sythara January 5, 2009 3:25 PM PST
Yep, very much free.

I know as a mac user you cant help to think that everything costs money, and lots of it.
by Alphaman63 January 5, 2009 7:58 PM PST
Yeah, AVG may be free in terms of dollars, but most people don't use AVG -- they pay annual subscriptions for Symantec, Norton, or others, year, after year. After year.

And they are anything but free in terms of CPU, disk, or RAM usage. One of my XP machines is an absolute pig until it gets done with its "quick" scan.

Add in the cost of a decent backup program (is there anything like TimeMachine even available for Windows? I've been doing Windows since v2 and I haven't seen anything.), PDF creation tools, and then OS upgrades (and please don't compare OS X with Vista Home Basic's pricing -- even Premium doesn't have some of its features). Then add in more U*X-style elegance in terms of security architected in (deny by default) rather than glommed onto DOS (allow by default), and you'll understand why the Microsoft Tax is so painful.

Oh, and did you know that defragging is done automatically by OS X? The file system is automatically checked? Log files are automatically rolled? Backups are done hourly? All those things that make up system maintenance in the Windows world for the end-user, are all done automatically by the computer under OS X. After all, that's what computers are for -- THEY are supposed to be the tools. Not us humans.

And yes, I'm a Windows sysadmin (hell, I've got 5 Windows systems at home), a Linux admin, an OpenVMS admin. And I also have one Mac. I'll take the Mac any day of the week.
by D3vildog699 January 6, 2009 12:28 PM PST
Its the EU fault if they don't know ho to look around, not mine, i did and i get my AV for free. And yes i did know the OSX defrags auto. I don't care cause i like doing Cpu maintenance.. Good points tho.
by Seaspray0 January 6, 2009 12:38 PM PST
Yes, AGV is free... but it is also not as reliable at protecting your PC as one of the others (cost vs reliability). There are also the online scans you can do at TrendMicro's, Kaspery's, and others websites... all for free.
by jtjt145 January 5, 2009 2:02 PM PST
How Micro$oft can accuse others of incurring a tax is beyond me.

With the existence of several alternate operating systems computers, there is no reason why the sale of a computer nowadays should be force-linked to a Micro$oft Windows operating system.
However, when trying to buy a new pc or laptop from a mainstream supplier, I often ask the staff whether it was possible to buy a machine that has NOT gotten some sort of Windows on it. Knowing the answer beforehand of course, I still love listening to the verbal acrobatics of the sales persons why that is NOT possible. I do feel sorry for them and understand they have no say in this.

This leads me to say, that Micro$oft's stranglehold on pc manufacturers is so unbelievable, one could compare it to mafia-style protection rort, without feeling bad. I really don't understand, that nowhere anyone has brought up a class-action yet against this monopolistic behavior. Having followed this situation for years, it is my understanding that several people/institutions actually tried, but mysteriously the process gets squashed somewhere in the pre-government ... courts area.

Now that is what I call a Micro$oft tax!
Reply to this comment
by ggirton January 5, 2009 2:03 PM PST
After years of paying the "Windows Tax" I switched to Macs. The 'Windows Tax', among other things, is the time you surrender to a small shrine in the corner of your home or office, or your friends' or parents, re-installing the operating system every 4 to 6 months to solve a variety of problems like: Progressive slowdown, Viruses that cannot be removed, New hardware that requires 3 or more re-boots to get all the drivers in. The wonderful Sunday afternoons that I spent re-installing Windows? I'm never getting that time back. Windows Tax, and death of happy life.
Reply to this comment
by compudoc318 January 5, 2009 2:42 PM PST
you lost all that time because you had no idea how to use a computer, not due to windows
by tm_anon January 5, 2009 3:32 PM PST
@compudoc318
You do realize that most people using a computer have no idea how to use a computer and wouldn't even be able to do a reinstall of the software. They'd also not realize that a reinstallation of the OS will be faster than letting it run as it is. They'd also not realize that a reinstallation will generaly rid your PC of viruses. The problem is Windows, not that he doesn't know how to use a computer. Try out Ubuntu and realize just what a difference an OS can make. Ubuntu runs faster, is easier to keep organized and is much more customizable than XP ever was. It's also more compatible and keeps me logged into my wireless network much more reliably than XP and on top of that it came with all the software I would have needed had I not been connected to the internet and using this PC as just an office computer, no extra licensing required. Face it, Windows has lots of problems. Mac has its own list of problems and Linux has its own list of problems and they can't all be contributed to the user just not knowing how to use a computer.
by MSSlayer January 6, 2009 1:58 PM PST
Compudoc,

Windows slows down over time, that is by design.

You don't know anything about computers either!
by gmclean0402 January 5, 2009 2:08 PM PST
My Mac just works and the only software I can't run is stuff that I really could do without anyway.

There are things far more painful to pay with than cash. Owning and using a PC extracts all of them all the time.
Reply to this comment
by compudoc318 January 5, 2009 2:47 PM PST
you mean the software that most every business in the world uses....lol.
by tuminator January 5, 2009 2:16 PM PST
why is apple the bmw, playing the "high end" market? according to that graph, you save all that money based on two equivalent machines
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo January 5, 2009 2:24 PM PST
Wow ! Just compare the Dell Studio Hybrid to the Mac Mini , and you see what a rip-off the Mac is. I knew Apple was a rip-off , but this is a real eye-opener ;)
Reply to this comment
by Alphaman63 January 5, 2009 8:00 PM PST
Yeah, nothing like comparing a two year old Apple Mac to a brand new Dell. Let's see if MS updates their chart after Apple introduces new Mac Minis tomorrow...
by Dan7637 January 5, 2009 2:32 PM PST
i would gladly pay the "apple tax" over a pc that i have to keep replacing
Reply to this comment
by compudoc318 January 5, 2009 2:47 PM PST
like apple makes all their own special built parts that pcs dont use.....lol.
by shinelikeitdoes January 5, 2009 2:36 PM PST
Two thoughts -

A Windows PC configured with hardware similar to a Mac Pro will cost less, but will also *never* achieve the same performance.

The last PC I bought (and the last straw) was an HP laptop at Best Buy with Vista installed. The sales rep at Best Buy actually "offered" a service that for "only $60" they would remove all the crap that came preinstalled on my laptop to help speed its performance etc. Nevermind that Vista is an utter piece of crap OS...it is completely ridiculous that if you want to purchase a preconfigured PC it is impossible to buy one that it not cluttered with a bunch of crap shareware and trial software...and that it is so bad that now they offer to remove it for a fee?

When you pay that Apple "tax" (a ridiculous assertion), you get a faster more reliable machine and a better overall experience. If I take my mac home and decide I *like* any of the preinstalled software, it is all fully functioning. I have already paid for it.
Reply to this comment
by compudoc318 January 5, 2009 2:45 PM PST
thats what you get for going to best buy, they are charging to remove the stuff, not ms, and by the way, its called add remove programs, a 6 year old can do it
by D3vildog699 January 5, 2009 4:00 PM PST
Lets take your mac against my home built and see who wins eh?
by pithenumber January 7, 2009 5:49 PM PST
take it against my budget gaming rig that costs $600
Crysis: I win no sweat with perfectly playable 30+ fps average
want more?
by renec2006 January 5, 2009 2:37 PM PST
i compared them also, but not that much in price!
Yes Mac is expensive, but a better OS.
Buy the Dell Hybrid and create a dual partition with gdisk.
Re-install MS os first then install Linux Mint 6.
Use them both and see for yourself which is better. I bet you will like Linux Mint 6. I got my attention.
Reply to this comment
by pithenumber January 7, 2009 5:49 PM PST
Linux is the best, better than Mac or Windows
I'm just tied to Windows for Gaming
by AppleSuxLeo January 5, 2009 2:37 PM PST
Apple should re-name the Mac Mini the iRipYouOff. Just look at the chart. Apple would probably pay you off to not publish a comparison chart.
Reply to this comment
by trd1282 January 5, 2009 2:49 PM PST
Oh man, are you some kind of comedian!? I mean that comment was hilarious. The "iRipYouOff", listen to this guy, pure genius. Wait let me try, how about the "Me no likey iDooDoo Suck Machine", eh eh?
by seven7dust January 5, 2009 5:07 PM PST
well there's a new mac mini coming out tomorrow
it'll blow away the Dell in Price performance ratio

it's funny how these statements were made exacly before
Apple's release of there new line of desktops
also notice how the notebooks weren't compared !

Finally after all these years Ms is getting good at taking cheap shots at their competitors
Bravo to the most Efficient organization in the world
by ballmerisanape January 5, 2009 2:37 PM PST
They might need a new chart after macworld.
Reply to this comment
by gggg sssss January 5, 2009 5:27 PM PST
and after Macworld 2010 maybe no Mac column at all ;-)
by Joe Real January 5, 2009 2:47 PM PST
And when you compare Microsoft with Linux....

You can buy a nice Linux PC for $299
While the same hardware with Windows XP is $499, including all the advertising crap that came bundled with it and you're going to spend hours to get rid of.

The Micosoft Tax is a whopping 40% over the same hardware loaded with Linux and Open Office.

But Hey, I pay my own fair share of Tax, so why would Microsoft or Apple be any different? Do you pay your taxes, do you?
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo January 5, 2009 5:49 PM PST
I`m all for Linux. My new Asus MOBO has an embedded ROM with "mini-Linux" on it that boots my PC in 3 seconds. It lets me surf the web , use Skype , Chat on multiple platforms , look at pics , and listen to music.
It`s the best of both worlds as Windows is just a click away. The Linux OS can`t be written to so it is safer than ANY platform for web browsing. It uses Fire Fox for the browser BTW. Gotta love the little penguin ;)
by Hep Cat January 5, 2009 2:48 PM PST
Microsoft has certainly fallen a long way when they have to rely on this kind of deceptive attack.

You haven't been able to buy a Dell or HP without Windows for quite some time - at least not without jumping through several hoops and giving up support options. There's no Apple or Windows "tax" - call it a usability "tax" if you must, because no PC is usable out of the box for mainstream applications without one or the other.
Reply to this comment
by ZetaZeta_ January 5, 2009 2:48 PM PST
I'd rather pay nothing extra and just get a powerful Max OS X enabled Psystar Open.
Oh wait, Apple doesn't like that.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan January 5, 2009 2:52 PM PST
It's a marketing hype tool. As such, I put as much faith in it as I do with Apple's claims on the iPhone's speed for running the OS / applications.

Treat it how you will, but in the end I don't think it makes a bit of difference.
Reply to this comment
by D3vildog699 January 5, 2009 3:08 PM PST
It really doesn't make a difference, all three OS's have a "Tax".. its just how you look at it and which hits you the most that becomes the real tell.
by john55440 January 5, 2009 3:03 PM PST
Apple/Mac means fewer choices:

Windows has the best and largest library of available applications, and the largest ecosystem of supported hardware, etc.

Windows and Windows Applications can be run on HP, Dell, Toshiba... custom-built, and self-built computers. With MacOSX and Mac OSX Applications, your only computer hardware choices are Apple, Apple, and Apple.
Reply to this comment
by MSSlayer January 6, 2009 2:04 PM PST
Windows doesn't come close to the sheer number of supported hardware in Linux.
by getwired January 5, 2009 3:06 PM PST
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
Reply to this comment
Showing 2 of 4 pages (220 Comments)
advertisement

Google's mobile hopes go beyond Nexus One

The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
• Photos: Unboxing Nexus One

Using your smartphone safely

faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement
    Click Here