Version: 2008

Comments on: Microsoft's computer in the round

CNET News' Ina Fried gets an exclusive behind-the-scenes look at Microsoft's Sphere surface computer.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by vanderbeeken July 29, 2008 4:19 AM PDT
Are you familiar with the Tangible Earth Project by Prof. Shin'ichi Takemura (University of Tokyo)? Five of these Tangible Earths were shown at the recent G8 Summit in Tokyo.

Tangible Earth: http://www.tangible-earth.com/
Tangible Earth at G8: http://www.tangible-earth.com/tearoom/en/
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo July 29, 2008 5:35 AM PDT
Would be a cool platform for Microsoft Virtual Earth.
Reply to this comment
by tundraboy July 29, 2008 9:42 AM PDT
No. Because the sphere becomes impractical when you zoom in on the map.
by mmichaels July 29, 2008 6:09 AM PDT
Syd Meier's Civilization V maybe?
Reply to this comment
by ralfthedog July 30, 2008 11:01 AM PDT
Spore!
by sal-magnone July 29, 2008 6:37 AM PDT
I can't wait to watch my Star Destroyer crush the pathetic rebellion on this device! Wait, I've said too much ...
Reply to this comment
by MaLvaDo39 July 29, 2008 6:39 AM PDT
Another distraction from Microsoft. "Hey, we can really innovate!"

May they keep Ballmer in place as long as it takes!

And, AppleSuxLeo, yeah, that's what we need, a Windows running piece of hardware to show off a virtual earth program. Oh wait, that's a PC already. But it's round, you say? What a waste.
Reply to this comment
by sal-magnone July 29, 2008 7:03 AM PDT
Just think how easy that globe will make it to do your geography homework MaLvaDo39.
by open-mind July 29, 2008 8:41 AM PDT
"Hey Beavis, ina said Steve wants 18 inch balls."

"Yeah Butthead. Heh ha heh heh."


Seriously ... this sounds like one of the hair-brained ideas that Bill would have vetoed from the get-go. I can't believe MS is actually wasting money on this.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 29, 2008 9:37 AM PDT
Didn't we just have this story yesterday?
Reply to this comment
by onlyauser July 29, 2008 9:41 AM PDT
DISTRACTION is correct. Things need to be fixed. I cannot understand why these people are so concerned with frosting and filler.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto July 29, 2008 10:05 AM PDT
FWIW, it's cute and all, but seriously... is there any demos showing how MSFT is working to remove bloat, stop malware, and things like that? I know it's not as sexy, but it would go a whole lot further in shaping their image as potential innovators. Showing off gee-whiz pretty stuff is easy. Showing off real innovation is hard work.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan July 29, 2008 2:35 PM PDT
Seriously, did you read the article? This is just a cool device and they even admitted there are no plans to take it to market.


Would you care to explain why you believe this article about this system should instead be about bloat, malware, etc? I mean really- you're way off base there.


For example, I read last week an article about Joss Whedon's Dr. Horrible now being available on iTunes. Surprisingly, they didn't spend the entire article about iPhone issues, MobileMe failures, or security holes in OS X that are still unaddressed and unpatched by Apple. The article didn't even bring that up. But why would there be? It was about about iTunes and not anything else.


What does this say about you? Are you so focused in your hatred for all things Microsoft that you completely neglected to read the article?

by quadj July 29, 2008 10:24 AM PDT
Why is everyone so interested in a "concept"? I mean, Microsoft even states that this isn't a workable product yet. So why are they even bothering to demo it?

You know, some people may gripe and complain that Apple is too secretive and doesn't give enough information about what they are doing. But at least when they do start to tell people, they actually have not only a working product, but one that is shippable now (or in the very near future) and one that actually has a target audience and a direction.

I don't mind Microsoft spending the time and money doing advanced research, but please don't waste my time with it until you are ready to bring it to market and explain how it's going to make my life "better" if I had one. I don't have time for pipe dreams and vaporware.
Reply to this comment
by amarkj July 29, 2008 2:06 PM PDT
quadj, how is Microsoft Research's advance projects, etc. wasting your time? I believe you were the one who clicked on the CNet story and read it and then took the time to write 3 paragraphs complaining about it.
by Vegaman_Dan July 29, 2008 2:38 PM PDT
Some projects make it out of development. Some do not. Regardless what anyone may think of Microsoft, you have to admit from a purely geek/tech viewpoint that this is a cool device, and I think that is all the article is trying to say. People that want to read more into it, or chastise Microsoft for not using this article to address OS bloat/malware/etc, need to seriously get a life.
by AlbooMED July 29, 2008 11:13 AM PDT
What, no video...
Reply to this comment
by ejeon1989 July 29, 2008 4:21 PM PDT
Well, it is different.......
Reply to this comment
by Ian Kirkland July 30, 2008 5:09 AM PDT
three things:
1. What a waste of time and effort when MS has so much more it needs to get done.
2. Reporters and commentators out to watch out, and I even heard the presenter do it, but 'MultiTouch' is a trademark of Apple, Inc!
3. Presenter, however, never said it worked with touch; he just said it was multitouch as does the article. This device is not touch sensitive in any way. It uses infrared imaging to determine the placement and movement of hands (and I suppose other body parts).
Reply to this comment
by ralfthedog July 30, 2008 11:07 AM PDT
Are the images projected from inside or out? How about the scanners?
Reply to this comment
(20 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Beyond Binary

During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft.


Beyond Binary is a look at how technology is changing our lives and the people behind all that life-changing stuff, with an extra emphasis on that which emanates from Redmond, Wash.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Beyond Binary topics

Binary Bits

    Follow Ina on Twitter (Twitter name: InaFried)
    advertisement
    advertisement