Version: 2008

Comments on: Facebook decides to bastardize its community

Want to drive users away? Use creepy advertising to make them uncomfortable.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
What about the positive aspects?
by dcholloway November 6, 2007 6:37 PM PST
You bring up some valid points, but for some reason you totally fail to acknowledge the potentially positive side-effects of a better targeted marketing campaign within Facebook.

Surely you are a consumer, and surely you would benefit from getting discounts on things you already buy, right?

What you're effectively accomplishing with this post is fear mongering about privacy violations that have yet to even occur.

I'm right there with you, though; I'm also a Facebook user and I don't want to know about who's buying adult diapers and so on. And I also want to know that my data is being respected, and to have some control over how it's being used. Everything should be opt-in/opt-out, and if certain ads (in the News Feed or elsewhere) annoy or offend me, I want to be able to prevent them from showing up again.

But I would like some good discounts, and maybe even some other monetary rewards for cooperating with companies I already do business with. Isn't that worth something to you, too?

I posted about this in my blog http://quantumcreative.blogspot.com if you'd like to read or comment more on my opinions regarding what's going to happen.
Reply to this comment
Is it really that bad
by DrtyDogg November 7, 2007 3:05 AM PST
or is it similar to the way google ads work, trying to show a relevant ads based on keywords that show up in the page. In other words do advertisers get to see indidvidual profiles and select them or do they select a few keywords to advertise to and if it happens to be on your page ? ? ?
Reply to this comment
Choice must be given
by Dazz123C November 7, 2007 12:01 PM PST
Personally I wouldn't mind this if there is actually discounts in relevant products i might be interested in. i mean target marketing already exists in the real world, this facebook idea is based on the same theory but just applying a new method. As i say, i'm all for this as long us as individuals benefit in someway e.g. Supermarkets use the club card scheme to monitor your purchase habits and target you & your consumer group more effectively, but you get something back in the form of points allowing you to get discount in store, obviously though the supermarket is benefiting more greatly than yourself from such a scheme otherwise they wouldn't be doing it!

BUT people should have the choice, as with the supermarkets you don't have sign up for a Clubcard. In addition, most online retailers give you the option to prevent them contacting you via email about their offers and distributing your details/data to Third Parties - there should be something similar if facebook go ahead with a scheme of this sort.
Reply to this comment
perhaps repeats a bit of the other comments but...
by dr.enton November 8, 2007 4:19 AM PST
...this is exactly how Gmail works - What Facebook needs to do is assure their patrons that the personal information that connects their Facebook account with their flesh and blood (i.e. email address, mobile number) is not included in their plan. Go ahead and advertise London hotels deals to me if I say I'm going to London - but don't email or text them to me! That is the line they must not cross with advertisers.
Reply to this comment
Profile is not conversations
by kiwi_mccake November 8, 2007 4:42 AM PST
Your conversations are not going to be used, it mentioned profile details. They are quite different. So a listing of liking "Origami" will send an advert at the top, but talking about it to a friend won't.

And there is no real fuss from me if some algorithm is looking at random words i type to make adverts. It is not like some sort of sweatshop where someone makes a decision what to send me, just automated process.
Reply to this comment
(5 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Software, Interrupted

In "Software, Interrupted," Dave Rosenberg discusses disruption in the software market, as well as the products and services that keep business technology norms in perpetual flux.

With nearly 15 years of technology and marketing experience spanning from Bell Labs to multiple start-up IPOs, Dave co-founded open-source software company MuleSource and now serves as general manager of Hardy Way. He also happens to be a U.S. patent holder and a workaholic. Technology is his best friend and mortal enemy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Software, Interrupted topics

advertisement
advertisement