Version: 2008

Comments on: Twitter's risk of ubiquity

The microblogging service runs the risk of becoming too prevalent without a clear path to revenue. There is a risk in becoming ubiquitous before you make money.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by hymanroth January 21, 2009 1:48 AM PST
I would say the fuzziness surrounding twitter's business model is entirely intentional, for the following reasons:

1) At the moment all they're interested in is usage. Users beget users, as per the network effect. The more users, the higher the company valuation, REGARDLESS of the business model. In other words, I'm willing to bet that twitter's business model is simply to be acquired. They'll leave it to the new owners to work out how to make money from the service. This would explain why there are no ads or other attempts at monetization. Why risk a user revolt at this stage?

2) The API. Twitter allows anybody to build on top of their platform. And now many users prefer to access twitter via third party services. But what if twitter starting applying a usage-based fee to access the API? They would simply shift the monetization onus on to third party developers. Hence, the likes of TweetDeck, would need to carry adverts or charge a subscription. And again, this strategy would benefit from letting usage of third party apps flourish.

So, In my view, there's no vagueness at all. Twitter is executing very rationally.
Reply to this comment
by thinkjose January 21, 2009 7:32 AM PST
The other interesting issue is that there are quite a few 3rd party Twitter tools that are making money.

Imagine NBC letting anybody run 30sec spots in between their shows and not collecting a dime off of it. The next 6 months will be interesting for twitter and all the other mini-biz models built on top of it.

http://twitter.com/thinkjose
Reply to this comment
by WeCanDoBIZ January 22, 2009 1:18 AM PST
Are there Twitter tools making money? Which? And isn't this annoying for Twitter itself? What does Twitter get from other companies that have managed to better exploit its platform for commercial gain?

When contemplating revenue models for Twitter I have often thought that charging third party developers to use the API could be one. So I read with interest the fact that later this week Twitter will start restricting use of the API: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10147535-2.html

Has this move revealed their strategy for revenue generation?

Ian Hendry
CEO, WeCanDo.BIZ
http://www.wecando.biz
Reply to this comment
by wade_coleman February 18, 2009 4:59 PM PST
People said the same things about Google, pre AdWords. I don't know how they're going to make money... but a massive base of fanatical users is as good a place to start as any.
Reply to this comment
(4 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Software, Interrupted

In "Software, Interrupted," Dave Rosenberg discusses disruption in the software market, as well as the products and services that keep business technology norms in perpetual flux.

With nearly 15 years of technology and marketing experience spanning from Bell Labs to multiple start-up IPOs, Dave co-founded open-source software company MuleSource and now serves as general manager of Hardy Way. He also happens to be a U.S. patent holder and a workaholic. Technology is his best friend and mortal enemy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Software, Interrupted topics

advertisement
advertisement