Comments on: Can terrorists use the Net to avoid wiretaps?
Can members of Al Qaeda use voice over Internet technology (VoIP) to avoid wiretaps?
Can members of Al Qaeda use voice over Internet technology (VoIP) to avoid wiretaps?
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Christopher Soghoian delves into the areas of security, privacy, technology policy and cyber-law. He is a student fellow at Harvard University's Berkman Center for Internet and Society, and is a PhD candidate at Indiana University's School of Informatics. His academic work and contact information can be found by visiting www.dubfire.net/chris/. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
If it's "legal" to wiretap outside the US, be it under seas or in Iraq, then go nuts. With the way IP networks go, there's no definitive way for anyone at that point in the life of an IP packet (physical point in life) to be able to definitively say whether it will cross the US or not. Therefore, I actually don't think "they" need to be concerned with it, again, as long as what they're doing at that point, and in my world, being relieved of the responsibility to follow each packet to see if it goes US or not.
"Those who would adandon freedom for security, deserve neither"
Many a soldier has given their life so that you might have the precious gift of freedom, don't give it up so easily...
I know I'm devil's advocating a bit here, but I think my points are valid. If I had the choice to be evesdropped on or not, then of course I'll pick not. If I'm evesdropped on, then, I'm personally not worried about it, since I'm squeeky clean.
The way we need to keep our freedoms, and to DEFINE exactly what our freedoms are, is to affect the laws and lawmakers in our country. Protest, write letters, boycott, do whatever you have to do, but do more than just whine.
(No one here is whining, I'm just making a point)
LAND LINES, as in what we would call MaBell in the past, can be recorded with permission of one party of the call (as in you) in 38 states. In the remaining states it either is Both parties must agree, or it is more technical then I have time to explain.
Thats for State law. There is also a Federal Telecommunications Act Law also about recording land lines. CellPhone recording is banned due to needing a scanner to capture the call; thats illegal. Scanners are also not allowed to reach the cell phone area if the unit is "stock". There is nothing in the law that prohibits the owner from modifying their scanner; but it must be "stock" if it is ever resold. (like I said loopholes; but listening to cell calls IS illegal)
The other odd phone that they never passed laws on is the AirPhone (airplanes). 400Mhz band. Nothing prohibiting listening in to/recording those phone calls based on the laws I have seen.
Now VoIP is new, and the laws have not caught up. There is nothing on the books for recording VoIP calls. If your server is based off US soil they (feds) can't touch you even if the laws are updated. Remember, VoIP's are simply data streams. They can be VoIP to VoIP and avoid the telephone network all together. Or you can go VoIP out to land line.
Intercepting VoIP calls would be the same as looking through your emails, or ghosting you to see what sites you go to. My theory is to make sure your provider has offshore servers!
- by Dalkorian January 17, 2008 9:11 AM PST
- Mikey boy here is just following bushit doctrine - lie lie lie and lie some more until we've finally turned this country into another evil communist nazi dictatorship. Papers please.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)(No, this has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with terrorists! Our fuhrer just wants to wiretap everyone without oversight or warrants so he can keep an eye out for "dissidents" and ship them to Gitmo as "terrorists". Anyone stupid enough to fall for this ploy should be deported to China.)