Version: 2008

Comments on: Can Howard Stern save Sirius XM?

Everyday working stiffs are being forced to accept givebacks and pay cuts to help save the companies they work for. Isn't it time that silly rich stars like Howard Stern do the same?

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 2 of 2 pages (34 Comments)
by rmoore5 February 14, 2009 6:23 AM PST
I have subscribed to Sirius since April 2007. Prior to that XM for 2 years. Here in the midwest I have had signal problems from time to time.

The Sirius signal became unusable June / July of 2008. I am on a 3 month subscription plan and the signal returned before my subscription expired. I had signal with ocassional dropouts mainly on the talk channels (radio classics, nascar, etc.) the music channels seemed better. I wonder if Sirius did this to manage bandwidth? I use the same radio on 3 different antenae. The problem is the same with each one.

The signal seemed to be the same all the way to Portland Oregon on a trip over the 1st weekend in Feburary. Around the 9th of Feburary the signal became very weak and was unusable on the 13th.

I had a very similar problem with XM when after updateing software they lost 2 out of 3 satellites. I assume that Sirius can not afford to use enough satellites to get the job done. I maybe wrong and probably am. But the fact I'm paying for a service that I can't get a signal on won't go on for long.
Reply to this comment
by Hallock February 14, 2009 7:07 PM PST
Howard Stern ruined it. I started with the original XM @ $6.95 per month. Then, MLB was added, Oprah, etc. all at ridiculously high contracts, all without options for customers to buy as addons. I thought I would get more listening with the merger, but most Sirius channels come for a fee. Now, the price is doubled and I am forced to pay for several channels I never listen to. Hmmm . . .why are they in bankruptcy?
Reply to this comment
by kdrobb2k February 20, 2009 5:04 PM PST
Sirius would surely have failed without Stern in this 2009 economy. They only had 600 to 700K subscribers in 2005. Two years after Stern came they were over 7 million and growing. Yes they are barely holding on after the XM merger but they are sill a viable service. The only thing hurting them is the debt. Subscriptions will continue to grow. Standard over the air radio is still repetitive and stagnant with it's limited play list formula from the seventies. Listeners want more.
Reply to this comment
by Pappy81 February 21, 2009 5:02 PM PST
Personally, I would not pay a dime to hear Howrd-his act grew old and tired years ago. I plan to let my subscription expire when the free tril in my car expires. While I recognize he has many listeners, his outrageous salary has dragged Sirius/XM to the brink of ruin. He is by far the largest expense on Sirius/XM, and the CEO of Sirius openly questioned whether or not he was worth it about 6 months ago. Facts are facts-it would appear this whole operation is no longer
viable.
Reply to this comment
by frankiecooper February 23, 2009 12:13 AM PST
awesome!! so based on your suggestion, since CBS is in trouble (they just shaved their dividend by a whopping 85%...), why don't you volunteer to take a cut in pay??

no?

why not? you make enough already, right? if you are grateful to CBS for giving you a writing gig, its the least you can do....
Reply to this comment
by whothehellgivesadamn November 3, 2009 10:18 PM PST
ok let's start over, the technology and convenience is a great idea , however their programming always sucked, then they got sucked into throwing money away at over paid worthless clowns like stern, stern is a good entertainer, and maybe worth, up to $30.00 an hour, if he represented real income advantages then they could have simply worked out a net contract with stern where stern gets a cut of his new subrcribers that sign up in his name and then nobdody could complain, i used to listen to stern for free, it was ok, when you have idiots throwing away hundreds of millions at mediorcre talent that brings in mediocre numbers then guess what you get, you'll get a few satelites that will be dead in the sky....its a great technology, they just didn't know how to program and spend their money on good programing and so they are idiots....somebody may find a way...five hundred million on that *****, how dumb, again the show is fine for free and if it pulls its weight, fine....let it crash and burn and let it be a lesson, it will probably find a way through....think of all the good bright people could have done with half a billion...wow...what a sick pathetic waste of money on a guy who would be just fine as a lead in for ***** at a strip bar for $30.00 PER HOUR, in short with mistakes like that and many others they deserve to crash and burn...
Reply to this comment
Showing 2 of 2 pages (34 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About The Audiophiliac

Ex movie theater projectionist Steve Guttenberg has more or less successfully hitched his future to home theater, but he still pines for the clickity-clack of 35 MM projectors and all the stale popcorn he could eat. Between projectionist gigs he worked as a high-end audio salesman for sixteen years, and produced records for an audiophile label. Oh, and one more thing, nothing annoys Steve more than being confused with the other Steve Guttenberg, the washed-up Police Academy actor. The wordsmith Guttenberg is a frequent contributor to a number of magazines and websites including Home Entertainment, Playback, and Ultimate AV. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

The Audiophiliac topics

advertisement
advertisement