Comments on: Sad news: Consumers don't pay up for quality
Pioneer's decision to get out of the TV business is further evidence that the race to the bottom is taking a toll on the quality of available consumer electronics. Do you care?
Pioneer's decision to get out of the TV business is further evidence that the race to the bottom is taking a toll on the quality of available consumer electronics. Do you care?
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Ex movie theater projectionist Steve Guttenberg has more or less successfully hitched his future to home theater, but he still pines for the clickity-clack of 35 MM projectors and all the stale popcorn he could eat. Between projectionist gigs he worked as a high-end audio salesman for sixteen years, and produced records for an audiophile label. Oh, and one more thing, nothing annoys Steve more than being confused with the other Steve Guttenberg, the washed-up Police Academy actor. The wordsmith Guttenberg is a frequent contributor to a number of magazines and websites including Home Entertainment, Playback, and Ultimate AV. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
I would agree... except for one troublesome, little fact. The demand is never for "good enough" but instead it is for quantity over quality. People don't care about quality anymore, and haven't for the past 5 or 6 years. All folks care about is how small and portable a playback device is, and how many ultra compressed songs and movies can be stored in it.
I cringe every time some acquaintance who doesn't know me better, wants play the movies or music they have pirated off of limewire across my mid priced Energy home theater speakers. Why? Because when you have a speaker that can reproduce sound accurately, then it displays every flaw that low quality sampling causes. I laugh at people who brag about their 2 and 3 terabyte music and movie collection because they will never listen to half of the media that they have collected off the torrent sites at night while the world sleeps.
Everyone should remember that Pioneer produces several different price ranges of TV panels. They are not talking about dropping just the most expensive Elite line, but getting out of the business completely. The demand for quality is just not there anymore.
'Simple market-driven economics' only works well if there is an educated consumer base who isn't taken in by 'simple advertising' too much.... in other words... a reasonable market.
btw: Pioneer plasmas are NOT a good example since many don't like their innate fragility.
I've also spent years trying to convince people of spending a few more bucks to buy an Apple Mac, and only succeed a portion of the time (while the majority of the people who didn't listen would still like me to help them do the things they can't figure out how to do or fix their systems).
I totally agree about audio equipment! I used my dad's old HK receiver (which he bought before I was born) up until a few years ago, when I spent like $600+ on a Yamaha that has been, OK, but not half as good as that old HK. I probably should have bought the HK (though are they still as good?... as so many 'experts' swore by the Yamaha as well), but the Yamaha had a feature I really wanted... which has turned out to be mostly useless because of the poor design of it (multiple zones.... though it only passes analog signals.... when almost everything I WANT to input is digital... how clueless are their engineers?).
The state of average consumer electronic goods is disgusting.... in design, function, and reliability. However, I might agree with a few other folks here.... was Pioneer really good enough here to warrant the extra $$$? I guess I think of Pioneer as a bit higher end brand... but have also seen them as more of a 'designer label' of the audio world..... more of a fashion statement than actual real quality advantage. I think all that does is make the consumer buying cheap crud think they are all the more justified. Kind of the 'Monster Cable' of audio equipment.
In other words.... if companies really want the consumer to care about quality.... then they need to give the consumer a quality product at a somewhat honest price. I think Apple is a company that now falls into this category... Sony has been somewhat in the game on this, depending on product line (like PS3 is a good example)... I've been quite happy with my Westinghouse LCD for a reasonable price, and know many others who have been as well, etc. However, I'm still looking for a company to build an equivalent to some old Infinity bookshelf speakers I had many years ago.
Quality is not cheap. First, they have to spend more on research to stay ahead of the curve. You don't produce better products than your competitors by putting your researchers on a budget. That means more expensive products. Better products are usually made with higher quality parts, which also increases the price. But more expensive products result in few sales, so they have to recoup their research and tooling up costs on fewer units, which means they have to charge even more per unit. I'm sure there's some extra for brand and status, but it may not be as much as you think. Sounds like Pioneer is following Fujitsu's lead. Fujitsu made high end plasma TVs, generally sold in high end audio video stores. They got out of the plasma display business in March 2008 for the same reason: people didn't want to pay the premium for better quality.
I think the same is true in consumer electronics. Most people buy the cheapo stuff, which either isn't good quality and/or breaks a lot. Some people pay more attention and get the better quality, though maybe not 'top-of-the-line'. Then there are audiophiles who buy really great stuff... but it could be argued to be over-priced for what you're really gaining. Then there is the almost-obnoxious products that might (or might not) be better quality, but maybe have great design or special features that cost obnoxious prices. It isn't JUST always a matter of quality.
I have a friend who installs high end video and audio equipment and home lighting controls etc. He only works by word of mouth. Doesn't advertise a bit. His home is his showroom. When he installs a system/theater and the owner has all his friends over they all WOW over it and he gets a ton of referrals. He doesn't sell low dollar sets even if asked. Doesn't have free interest financing, no credit cards accepted for payment. He had an "extremely good year" as he put it last year. This one place where high end electronics have a home.
They also have a home as when reading reviews they are a point of reference and what lower sets are compared too. So their quality forces other manufacturers to at least TRY to get it right.
Just because the walk in the door of a retail store clientele can't afford them, doesn't mean they aren't "necessary".
The big problem is that paying a premium for a TV is a tough sell. Look at TVs from 2 years ago - thicker, lower resolution, lower contrast, fewer connectivity options (hdmi, ethernet, etc.).
The other big problem is that it is not very easy to tell the difference in picture quality between sets. To be able to get 2 competing sets playing the same demo material from the same source hooked put the same way and then repeat that with other sources (let's look at HDTV, Blu-Ray, DVD, streaming internet video) is impossible.
There have been predictions that Apple will enter the TV business - let Pioneer's failure be a warning to them. Stay away - the TV business is a commodity business.
I've sometimes thought of being an audiophile as almost a curse.... I guess if you can't tell the difference, it saves one a LOT of $$$. ;o)
The computer business more or less is a commodity business yet Apple still gets away with charging a large premium for their products and they are actually reporting gains on the computer sales right now while all the other manufacturers are reporting loses.
Clearly they are doing something right and if anybody had a shot at selling a premium priced TV right now it would be Apple.
I'm not sure I agree with that statement. The key to business is setting a balance between what you deliver vs what you charge. There is a sweet spot for different types of consumers that you can choose to go after... one point or many is your choice. The companies making the absolute best products can be charging so much for them that they don't prosper. Their fault, not ours. The companies charging the least for the worst stuff will have customers, but not as many as the budget value at the right budget price (see visio). Pioneer may make the best tv's, but I can't route for them to make a fortune if they charge too much.
Don't lay it on the consumer. Sales / Marketing people are as much responsible.
A $10,000 Pioneer v/s $2,500 Brand X. Pretty big price difference if you ask me...
The question to be asked... Are you getting 75% more picture quality and features with the Pioneer?
Obviously not.... Probably more like 10%, at best.... From a pure cost standpoint the Pioneer is way overpriced. Actually, Pioneer should be asking themselves why there cost is so much higher when they are only marginally better than the lower priced competition.
Only those consumers that want "the best" and are willing to pay for "the best" are going to be in that market. And that market is definitely dwindling....
And for the record... I'm not sure I would call people buying $2000+ video units bottom feeders... I still think that's a lot of money no matter how you look at it...
With OLED and other tech on the horizon, Pioneer probably saw the writing on the wall.
Also, LCD is closing the gap fast with LED tech, and moving into new territory with 3D. Then there's Laser displays from Mits....
- by rainsft February 9, 2009 9:57 AM PST
- If Pioneer had spent a lot of money on advertising themselves as an "image" product (e.g. Bose, Lexus, Apple etc.), they might have appealed more to those "image is everything" types, and been a bit more successful at charging more for a product than normal people were willing to spend. I'm glad that they didn't go down that road, but will miss a quality alternative in the market place.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by minimalist February 9, 2009 10:38 AM PST
- Pioneers failed horribly at marketing themselves. You can't just let your product get lost in a sea of blaringly bright LCD's with crappy content running to your display and let Sony and Samsung steal the show with their blu-ray end caps.
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 4 pages (114 Comments)If you are going to produce a premium product you have to go the extra mile to get all the details right and more than anything that includes marketing.
Would Lexus sell the number of vehicles they sell if they just let their cars be thrown into the mix into a lot with a bunch of Dodge's and Toyota's with no knowledgeable sales people to sell you on the premium vehicle's qualities? That's effectively what Pioneer did when they let Berst Buy handle the way their products were displayed. They were horribly sloppy.