Comments on: Is the iPod, at long last, a high-end audio component?
The Audiophiliac's take on the Wadia 170i Transport iPod "dock."
The Audiophiliac's take on the Wadia 170i Transport iPod "dock."
The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
Photos: Unboxing Nexus One
faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.
Ex movie theater projectionist Steve Guttenberg has more or less successfully hitched his future to home theater, but he still pines for the clickity-clack of 35 MM projectors and all the stale popcorn he could eat. Between projectionist gigs he worked as a high-end audio salesman for sixteen years, and produced records for an audiophile label. Oh, and one more thing, nothing annoys Steve more than being confused with the other Steve Guttenberg, the washed-up Police Academy actor. The wordsmith Guttenberg is a frequent contributor to a number of magazines and websites including Home Entertainment, Playback, and Ultimate AV. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Add this feed to your online news reader
When playing 70's rock it is ACC DCC but that is a very bad pun.
That said, for about same money you can get a real computer with an optical output on its sound card, hook its video to your TV, hook the optical audio cable to your receiver, and enjoy. Or just get an universal (DVD+flash+iPOD cradle) player with optical output. Will cost about the same AND play DVDs.
BTW, I loved you in Short Circuit, which the animators of WALL-E have totally ripped off.
Presumably you listening to this in your home where you have all your expensive audio gear. And if you have an iPod you also have a computer with the capacity for Terabytes hard drive space. Why not put all your lossless audio there get digital out into your gear and then control it with an iPod Touch via wifi from anywhere in the house?
...Apple Lossless, and AAC files will sound "good," just not quite the same as the original CD. In other words, only AIFF and WAV files can be heard with bit-for-bit accuracy over the 170i.
The whole point of a Lossless codec is that it is bit for bit identical to the original when played back (hence the Lossless moniker). Am I missing something, or is my understanding of how the Lossless codecs work wrong?
First of all as most of you know, the iPod is a portable jukebox. You can use it as a personal player to play back your 128KB AAC files through the ear buds that came with the iPod, or you can bump the resolution up to 256KB AAC for better audio playback, as well as upgrade to more expensive ear buds... Not everyone listens to the iPod with just ear buds! I don't...
Then there is AIFF, WAV, and Apple Lossless which are much larger files of the same songs, but bit for bit accurate to the original "Red Book" CD's. Yes more music fits on the iPod with the AAC encoded files compared to the lossless ones I've just mentioned, so some sacrifices need to be made. My music is all in AIFF format on my computer as well as the "Playlists" I've created for my 30GB iPod. Once you have AIFF formats, you can always down convert to AAC if drive space is at a premium. Up converting from AAC to AIFF does not improve the sound quality it just makes it 10 times bigger than the AAC with the same AAC sound quality. In other words, you can't make a lossy file like AAC or MP3 sound better once you chopped off a bunch of the data bits, while you can go the other way, AIFF to MP3 or AAC anytime.
Yes I can use my Airport extreme and stream Airtunes to my stereo equipment from my Mac, but I don't like the fact that I am taxing my Hard drive with excessive use and hours all the while I'm streaming my tunes. I listen to music for hours on end every Friday, Saturday and Sundays... 20 Hours plus on average every weekend adds up, and sooner or later my drive will crap out sooner than it should under normal use! To me, not a wise move...
This is where the beauty of the Wadia comes in. It is a "Pass-Through" device, meaning that it takes whatever songs you have on your iPod, weather encoded in AAC, AIFF, WAV etc. and bypasses the "Internal DAC" in the iPod and inputs the given encoded tunes into your external source, i.e. an "External DAC", or your Low, Mid or High end sound system/stereo. With AIFF encoded songs on my iPod, I plug it into the Wadia and all my songs input into a "Benchmark-Media DAC-1", then into a pair of "Dynaudio Acoustics" powered speakers as my set-up. The iPod never sounded this good! This is quite a slick set-up to say the least!! The better your audio equipment, speakers, external DAC and so forth, the better your music will sound, probaly as good as the "Studio Masters". Oh yeah, you can watch videos from the iPod too on an LCD, Plasma etc. TV via. Component Video jacks. A remote comes with the 170i also.
The only negative I've found is that you can not display the cover art or song titles onto a TV via the component video output. The GUI is not accessible from any of the iPods. It is blocked from doing so because of Apple's design not because of the Wadia.
The $379 price tag is mainly for the microprocessor that allows for the audio pass-through to bypass the iPod's DAC. This is the only product on the market, that I know of, which does this and does it extremely well! I hope this was useful info. for those who took the time to read it. Thanks!
I think the general consensus is that these portable players weren't designed for Audiophile-quality consumption.
- by boxter September 5, 2008 10:20 PM PDT
- Why would anyone buy this? Surely you can just use your PC as the source if you are at home?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(18 Comments)