Comments on: What's the best Web site for geotagged photos?
Photo-sharing Web sites are getting better at handling pictures based on where they were taken. My top pick is Flickr, with SmugMug and Google's Picasa tied for second.
Photo-sharing Web sites are getting better at handling pictures based on where they were taken. My top pick is Flickr, with SmugMug and Google's Picasa tied for second.
Priceline, Classmates.com, and Orbitz say customers should read the fine print before complaining about being charged to join loyalty programs they didn't want.
Verizon Wireless has doubled its early-termination fees for smartphones, but what does it mean for the rest of the industry?
This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.
Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
Wi-fi + Bluetooth + GPS.
Pretty Slick
- The Digital Dabbler -
http://digitaldabblings.blogspot.com/
receiver embeded in camera and appending metadata to picture
file. So it would registrate not only coordinates but orientation of
camera too. It eliminate fotoartist from stupid work. Anybody listen
about it? Me not. But how should look at this Agent007-like
feature some authorities, Chinese, for instance?
Do these people even log into geotagged sites to see other people? I imagine more people log into these sites to see their OWN exploits.
I could care less if John Smith was climbing Seneca Rock yesterday. Might as well have been ordering a Big Mack at the corner McDonalds.
Maybe I am missing the point of geotag...but to me it is about the most lame, self-promoting BS, I can think of at the moment.
I explore with this technology. Google Earth is great for wandering around the planet, but this adds a personal touch to it.
It's interesting to look at what other people are doing. Sure there are people that only care about showing off what they do, but if it wasn't for people that enjoy looking at what these people are doing, the idea wouldn't be so successful.
It's a toy for most people, and they have fun with it. If you don't get it, then don't bother yourself. Just ignore.
If you want to store more, its going to cost you $25/year.
seems the author of this cnet article was duped into believing flickr was free just like those transferring their photos from the now defunct "yahoo photos" (where there was no image limit).
You aren't exactly limited to 200 photos, though--just limited to seeing the last 200 you uploaded. The older ones are still there, and I'd imagine they show up in a maps search, for example. But yes, they are more inaccessible than not.
Personally, I found the limit to three visible sets (albums) more annoying.
Also bear in mind that some Yahoo-branded DSL customers (AT&T and Verizon if memory serves) get free pro accounts.
http://digitaldabblings.blogspot.com/2007/12/my-gps-has-arrived.html
W/R to the best geotagged sites, Picasa is my winner as I believe it does the best job of detecting EXIF encoded geo location and presenting the photos on a map per photo or per album. Ohhh, and it is free.
- The Digital Dabbler -
http://digitaldabblings.blogspot.com/
In regards to your question what is the best site for geo tagging? I would recommend
www.planeteye.com
It 's user friendly and a great looking site. It really stands out among all the other geotagging sites. It's a perfect destination for travel planning and photo sharing.
matt.
- by flickrroamer November 23, 2009 9:34 PM PST
- Is there a website that knows how to intelligently clump images up? Like show big dots where there's lots of images? Sorta like this Respotter iphone app, except I wanna do it on my own photos instead of everyone else's.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(18 Comments)