Comments on: Firefox churns to version 2.0.0.11
A problem showing images on some Web sites triggered programmers to whip up a Firefox update in a handful of days.
A problem showing images on some Web sites triggered programmers to whip up a Firefox update in a handful of days.
roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.
The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.
This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.
Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
It does not work for individual user, as he does not have IT department, and the list of "applications" he uses is very diverse and includes dozens of web sites. Who will test them all and say when it is OK to upgrade?
So what are the user options with Firefox? Either auto-update or don't update at all, and be vulnerable to dozens of Firefox security bugs. Delaying updates by about a week might help a little bit, but not always.
- Not enough testing done
- by jscott418 December 2, 2007 5:36 PM PST
- I think all software is becoming more complex and needs to be
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(7 Comments)tested much longer then what is being done. My question is why is
Mozilla talking about Firefox 3 when 2.0 is still being perfected?
Should we not get one working really good first?