Comments on: Set camera clock to GMT for better geotagging?
Changing my camera clock to Greenwich Mean Time will sidestep time zone hassles of geotagging. But what are the downsides?
Changing my camera clock to Greenwich Mean Time will sidestep time zone hassles of geotagging. But what are the downsides?
Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.
The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.
This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.
Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
When/if public posting of my photos becomes my biggest priority, I'd definitely make the switch, but not before.
If the site DOES have that function, "universalizing" the camera's clock becomes moot.
however, suggest that you also posting your question on DP
Review's "Open Talk" Forum at:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/forum.asp?forum=1018
Good shooting!
- Do we really need timezones?
- by elbowgr October 2, 2007 5:20 AM PDT
- Use of an absolute time of GMT (actually UTC - more or less the same but more accurate) is more common than you think, especially when you look at web sites, applications and science. Java's time is based on UTC and many web applications (bulletin boards) work the same way. They need to serve an audience around the world and UTC is the common standard.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- Timezone
- by bofh October 25, 2007 9:31 PM PDT
- For a recent trip to Japan, I had to fight through this issue. I ended up settling on PST (my home time zone) as I did not want to miss being able to tie the times properly but I may look into using GMT instead.
- Like this
-
(5 Comments)What?s more important to you? Having a definite time for your geotagging, or a convenient time that matches expectations? If it is important that your most sensitive photos have the correct absolute time then I?d go with using GMT, also the same if I was frequently travelling around the world.
What is local time anyway but a fudge of the real time so that everyone wakes up at 7am no matter what where in the world they are. Right now, somewhere it?s 5pm and someone is leaving the office. Local time is made even more perplexing by it then being adjusted by summertime which is too arbitrary. (?Hey guys, we won?t tell you to wake up an hour early, instead we will change our clocks.?)
It?s too bad that in these days of worldwide communications that we have to deal with over 25 different times zones and an international dateline to calculate local time. Why not just switch to UTC for most communications? I?ve personally experienced issues dealing with time zones (EST -5 , CST -6 , PST -8, GMT & India +5.5) and Summertime (July & Brazil = EST + 3 / December & Brazil = EST + 1).
What would it hurt to say that in Boston, the work day starts at 14:00 and ends at 22:00 and in the summer starts an hour earlier? It?s not that radical, Arthur C. Clarke mentioned a single world time zone in a book of his many years ago.
The additional problem I have is that I merge data between a NMEA file and an image using Downloader Pro after the fact so it will require some synchronization to make sure everything ties together properly.
But for now, my pictures are showing up where I expected them to be and I'm pretty happy with the results.
http://flickr.com/photos/jauderho/sets/72157602229609984/