Comments on: Turf war between Microsoft's JPEG XR and Adobe's DNG?
JPEG XR has features that appeal to advanced amateur photographers who use raw today and whom Adobe is courting for Digital Negative.
JPEG XR has features that appeal to advanced amateur photographers who use raw today and whom Adobe is courting for Digital Negative.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.
Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
Second of all, like the CNET blog said, people don't like processing time. They want to be able to show, edit, and email their pictures instantly. If the quality and small footprint (size) of Microsoft's new JPEG XR is true, then it might be a winner for an evolved JPEG format. Also, given the fact that the JPEG name is popular and widely-known, it wouldn't hinder Microsoft's marketing efforts unless they are really stupid.
True openness is key. But then, Microsoft seems to be getting better at that.
DNG is a well specified format for storing raw sensor data from cameras. HD Photo is a format for specifying compressed high bit depth images (which JPEG can't do) after they have been demosaiced and had adjustments and white balance applied. It's apples versus oranges.
I would gladly enjoy a camera that could produce both, but for different reasons. HD Photo can be a great successor to JPEG, DNG cannot be a JPEG successor because it serves an entirely different process.
Please do more research before writing articles such as this. The other article on HD Photo helping out Vista sales is also misleading. HD Photo works just as well on XP with the appropriate software. There's nothing special about Vista's support for HD Photo.
But I do think there's some overlap, especially in the future, since Adobe wants raw and DNG to spread more broadly into the very zone that Microsoft sees appeal for JPEG XR.
It's Microsoft's opinion, not my own, that HD Photo/JPEG XR will help Vista's prospects. Regarding Windows, XP can handle HD Photo, but you have to find, download and install the support yourself.
Another story you might want to look at (http://news.com.com/2100-1045_3-6153730.html) makes the point that Vista will help HD Photo (not the other way around).
Have a look here: www.trellis-mgmt.com
...clearly there's something better around already...and it's Jpeg-compatible.
- A Review02
- by angelfast November 7, 2007 5:46 PM PST
- I know very well that car maintenance is the first concern for the car buyers. Whether you own a sedan car, SUV, sports car or a luxury vehicle you would normally seek assurance that car parts, its exterior and interior accessories, body kits, car spoilers, billet grilles, wheels, rims etc are freely available. Toyota, Nissan, Honda, General Motors, BMW, Ford and many car manufacturers have taken care of this need of their customers. While purchasing car parts price of the OEM car parts has always been as issue. High priced car parts scare away the car parts buyers in spite of the fact the OEM car parts offer reasonable duration of warranty and after sales service and replacement options. Buying of aftermarket car parts, on the hand, is a very good option. The low priced aftermarket car part, acura brake pads - billet grille; car spoilers have extended ease to the buyers. They can no buy Volvo Cornering Light for the sake of maintaining their cars and obtaining a longer useful service.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)