Version: 2008

Comments on: MIT develops camera-like fabric

Researchers have woven a swath of fabric consisting of special fibers that can capture an image of what's nearby.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by James Anderson Merritt July 7, 2009 1:55 PM PDT
So this suggests how an "invisibility" suit might be achieved: cover the suit with pairs of pixels and camera-elements that are positioned on opposite sides of the suit from each other. The pixel displays what its corresponding camera element "sees." From whichever direction you look, you always see "through" the suit to the background that lies directly behind. It will be interesting to see what comes of this development.
Reply to this comment
by Shankland July 7, 2009 7:28 PM PDT
It's very difficult since "opposite" varies according to one's perspective looking at a person wearing the suit. Standing directly in front of a person wearing such an invisbility suit and looking at his forehead, I should see what's directly behind his head. But somebody standing to my right should see a different view to the left of the invisible person.
by ryokowerx July 7, 2009 2:27 PM PDT
Trust me, I'm sure the DoD and DARPA is looking into this with interest.
Reply to this comment
by Shankland July 7, 2009 7:25 PM PDT
The U.S. Army actually helped fund the work, so you can bet on it.
by Vegaman_Dan July 7, 2009 2:46 PM PDT
And this is why it's important to keep kids in school and excite them with the proper foundation in the basics. From those students, great advances in technology are born such as these.
Reply to this comment
by Havoc70 July 7, 2009 3:22 PM PDT
Ha Ha didn't you know the government is already using this ? Along with several other "Secret" projects
Reply to this comment
by Endbringer July 8, 2009 5:20 AM PDT
I'm sure you know all about the "secret" projects the government is working on, right?
by polyomino July 7, 2009 4:50 PM PDT
Why, that's just like Dr Miranda Jones' garment in the third season episode, number 62, "Is There In Truth No Beauty?", of Star Trek!
Reply to this comment
by Thranx July 7, 2009 5:35 PM PDT
I'll take my invisibility cloak now. Thanks.
Reply to this comment
by Sam Papelbon July 7, 2009 9:19 PM PDT
1: obtain shirt that can take pictures
2: toss shirt in high school locker room
3: ??????
4: profit
Reply to this comment
by timeshare102 July 7, 2009 9:56 PM PDT
Nice stuff. Privacy stuff is but a distant dreams these days. Thanks to these gadgets that let us "do" things better.

Edward
http://www.timesharerelief360.com
Reply to this comment
by luke_marsh July 8, 2009 1:52 AM PDT
Ahh so you mean we should have enough capability to home in more effectivly on far more Extraterrestrial planets over the next 2 decades.
Reply to this comment
by Drazhna July 8, 2009 6:10 AM PDT
Shades of Shroud of Turin
Reply to this comment
by istill316 July 8, 2009 8:34 AM PDT
I think seeing in all directions would make me dizzy,
Reply to this comment
by aawindoze2 July 8, 2009 8:42 AM PDT
Wow those dudes at MIT are just too freakin smart man!

RT
www.be-anonymous.tk
Reply to this comment
by maxwalker2 July 8, 2009 9:47 AM PDT
To clarify, this is more like a scanner than a camera. Note that it "reproduced an image placed near the mesh". I don't think Physics makes it possible to capture an image of a scene at any distance from the fabric without lensing the light back to convergence. Suppose there's a bright green dot a few feet away in the locker room. The green light from it would illuminate the whole fabric mesh evenly, so the only way for the fabric to know that it's one green dot and not a blur is to know the angle from which the green light is hitting each part of the fabric. That's what a lens makes possible. This is just a scanner.
Reply to this comment
by maxwalker2 July 8, 2009 10:00 AM PDT
Update: I went to read the abstract of the paper before emailing Prof. Fink about this and noticed that the fabric actually can resolve the direction of light incident on it. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/nl9009606?prevSearch=%255Bauthor%253A%2BFink%255D&searchHistoryKey=
They use sub-wavelength spacing of light sensors so that they can detect the direction from diffraction-like effects. They must look at the relative phase of the same light hitting two sensors less than a wavelength apart to determine the angle. I imagine further improvements in the technology could eventually lead to better imaging.
by harvardhup July 8, 2009 11:04 AM PDT
This is a breakthrough indeed. But can they make also an optic device that may enable us to watch ourselves from all directions? In that case we can call both of these cutting edge technologies a twofold big achievement.
Reply to this comment
(18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Underexposed

This blog sheds light on digital photography subjects such as cameras, photo editing, and Web sites. Shankland joined CNET News in 1998 after a five-year stint as a science writer. He's a lab rat who grew up in Los Alamos, N.M., and graduated from Harvard.

Contact Stephen at Stephen.Shankland@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Underexposed topics

advertisement
advertisement