Comments on: Canon working on 'black dot' fix for new SLR

The camera maker is "investigating ways to improve and/or mitigate" the black dot problem along with vertical banding on its 5D Mark II. Good news: it's a firmware fix.

[mooney101]

IF anyone is looking for a quick fix just go buy the Nikon D3. I'd be VERY upset if I had just purchased this camera only to have a problem like this. Canon may be facing a lawsuit, if they don't get this address properly. Shame on Canon for releasing a product in this condition.

[da_bombdiggidy]

If we are going to point out a major flaw, I would point out the D3's 1080p video. It's just so...whats the word... nonexistant? missing? unavailable?

[sevort]

D3 is not a competitor to Canon 5D, the D700 is.

[mooney101]

OK go out and by a D700, if this canon thing is a problem for you. And if you really need the video maybe pick up a D90 while your at it :)

[sythara]

Its hard for people to just buy a Nikon when you have several thousand of dollars invested in lenses for Canon.

[kyle5434]

Agreed. It's easier (and less expensive) to just not be a bleeding edge early adopter, and instead hang back until a firmware update or two.

[sythara]

Yeah that is very true. The same principal applies to cars as well. Sad when so many new products are all buggy.

[forestwander]

I hope they get this fixed soon.

I am looking to purchase one of these new camera for my nature photography business.

This would make an excellent camera upgrade from my 350d.

Anything new usually has bugs.

Maybe it is a good thinfg that it is out of stock everywhere.

ForestWander Nature Photography
www.ForestWander.com

[aarthabenn]

I have researched for one of the best DSLR cameras without breaking the bank and have found it in the 5D model. A very flexible camera, truly a masterpiece for shooting landscapes and portraits as well as anything in between, the 5D fulfills any needs I had prior to owning it. My only wish is that it had a more flexible bracketing system, such as 5 frames bracketing instead of 3 frames. Still, worth its weight in gold, the 5D is the one DSLR I would recommend for any job and for any serious amateur or pro photographer out there.

regards
aatha
[CNET editors' note: link deleted]

[alegr]

This is analog design problem (long recovery with overshoot after saturation) that shows up when the readout amp is set to high gain for high ISO. It could be possible to mask it by post-processing, but I doubt that.

[donsms]

How can a company release this camera to the public for sale with these serious problems,especially for the amount of money they charge?Seems like a rush job to me.

[mooney101]

It is a rush job. Canon is staring to realize they are losing their customers to the D3 and D700 so they needed some publicity and fast. So they ship a defective product with hopes they can fix it later in a firmware update. Bad move and another reason I'm glad I've stuck with a Nikon system.

[rbradbury]

I shoot 20 to 30 weddings a year with two 5D's, one 40D, and one 30D. They have all been awesome and reliable camera's and they get banged around all the time. Without hesitatition, I added myself to the list for a 5D Mark II. I picked mine up on Monday. As a professional, I can tell you the camera is nothing short of amazing. ISO 3200 is the same quality as ISO 800 on the 5D Mark I. I was able to handheld shoot a picture inside my dark closet with almost no light, and the image was better than my own eyes coluld see. The HD 1080P video is also amazing. My assistant shoots Nikon when not assisting me, both his D200 and D300 with thousands less cycles on them than my Canon's have failed. Both camera's needed to be returned for service. So, unless you've actually used a 5D Mark II, don't slam it. Canon and Nikon are both constantly pushing the limits of sensors, light, and data technology; I'm sure Canon will resolve the rare black spots. The Canon 5D Mark II is an amazing camera for under $2700 and I'm sure it will be a workhorse for several years to come. Cheers to Canon!

[paulroz]

Canon - Nikon, as my father always said "It's a poor workman who blames his tools". Both systems are so way ove rthe top for 99% of the pro jobs out there. Each manufacturerer races to raise the level to the next "texas-big size". I switched to Canon after 37 years of Nikon because they didn't have a full sized chip, which was a hinderance to interior wide angle work. I've worked with a friend who has the D3 and seen incredible results. I already made the switch and am committed to the Canon system. The 5D is a fabulous camera but those young art directors have a ***** envy thing for "bigger" so I have to upgrade to the MkII. Chevy-Ford, Mac-Pc, Canon-Nikon, work with what works for you and stop the juvenile, brand specific boasting. If we didn't live in such a screwed up consumer society may be we would all be ahead of the game. All those view camera shooters in the past knew you either had the eye or you didn't. Those cameras were all pretty basic and it came down to who had the talent not who was shooting with a Sinar or Linhof!!