Version: 2008

Comments on: Apple settles patent suit over iPhone visual voice mail

Klausner Technologies can now count Apple and AT&T as licensees of its technology after convincing them to settle a patent-infringement lawsuit filed last year over the iPhone.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by JohnSegal June 16, 2008 7:02 PM PDT
You can download Klausner Technologies's patent here at http://www.patentretriever.com
Reply to this comment
by tschiltz June 16, 2008 8:55 PM PDT
I love it - Apple isn't any different than M$. Looks like they were forced to pay for technology that they stole. So, Apple=M$ What do you say to this, fanboys?
Reply to this comment
by tschiltz June 16, 2008 8:55 PM PDT
I love it - Apple isn't any different than M$. Looks like they were forced to pay for technology that they stole. So, Apple=M$ What do you say to this, fanboys?
Reply to this comment
by slaingod June 17, 2008 3:23 AM PDT
That you are trolling?

It is very difficult to know what new techniques and 'business method' patents are out there, and what the 'inventors' think they cover. As a matter of course, most businesses never look to see which patents they may be infringing, as to do so and NOT find one that they are later found to be infringing could be construed as 'willful' infringement.

That said, I don't really see how this patent is any less obvious than a list of missed calls with caller id...unless that is patented too.
by Penguinisto June 17, 2008 7:19 AM PDT
"Nice troll, idiot."?
by aka_tripleB June 17, 2008 2:12 PM PDT
tschiltz is just stating the fact that Apple is starting to act just like what Apple freaks claim Microsoft acts like. You can't bash someone and expect to go unphased when the tables are turned. As Apple grows, it is just showing that it doesn't "Think" as "Different" from Microsoft as people want to believe.
by Seaspray0 June 17, 2008 6:48 AM PDT
Given that the technology was also used by vonage, I can pretty much assume it's more of a patent on a process or concept rather than any particular piece of code or hardware. Vonage and the iphone are not exactly similar in hardware. I wouldn't jump the gun on saying apple "stole" it. They could have developed it all on their own with no idea that it was already pantented. There are examples in history. Both Marconi and Tesla developed sending information by radio waves. Marconi was first to the patent. This type of situation happens quite a bit these days and apple and microsoft are no exceptions to that.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto June 17, 2008 7:22 AM PDT
Err, you can only patent the process... patenting specific software is impossible. Patenting hardware is possible, but the patent is limited to that particular bit of hardware design. IMHO the "software patent" (where you're patenting a process, often an obvious one) should simply not be allowed, or at least should have the restriction that you must make and market software that uses the process you've patented (which would wipe out the patent troll companies overnight).
by AppleSuxLeo June 17, 2008 8:27 AM PDT
I`m so sick and tired of Mr Whipple lying at these Apple demos and saying they invented all this new technology and "patented the H*** out of it" , and it turns out to be a lie.
Reply to this comment
by skeptical58 June 18, 2008 5:28 AM PDT
Dear AppleSuxLeo -- if Apple annoys you so, why waste your time reading articles about Apple? Get a life... Read about things you actually enjoy.

BTW, Apple does file for and receive a LOT of patents. As Seaspray0 points out, sometimes you file and someone has beaten you to the punch with a similar patent. It happens in every business. But the list of patents Apple has been granted is pretty huge.

Give your blood pressure a rest. Read about something you like for a change.
by anti3g July 7, 2008 7:14 PM PDT
The actual price of the new apple iphone 3G = $399!

The published price being advertised all over for the new apple iphone 3G is $199?what they are not telling you is that price is only for new ATT customers and those current ATT customers who happen to be eligible for an equipment upgrade (according to ATT, upgrade eligibility is ?generally? determined by the amount of time remaining on a current contract). For all those current ATT customers who do not happen to be at the end of their contract, the actual price for you is $399 plus an $18 upgrade fee along with a new 2-year contract. ATT is penalizing their long-time, account in good standing, customers a whopping $200. Why is the actual price of the new iphone not being advertised for what it is?$399? It?s the same price as the old iphone with an increase in the data plan.

Post your 3G iPhone activation experience or opinion at:
www.themissingasterisk.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
by gregrt August 25, 2008 6:44 AM PDT
I love it when they system works, and big companies get caught. Big companies trying to make profit on the back of others. ARRGGG
Reply to this comment
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement