Comments on: The future of the iPod
The device most responsible for Apple's 21st century renaissance gets short shrift these days next to the Mac and the iPhone. What lies in store for the iPod?
The device most responsible for Apple's 21st century renaissance gets short shrift these days next to the Mac and the iPhone. What lies in store for the iPod?
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.
Add this feed to your online news reader
anywhere, anytime. In the US, free WiFi is getting very common,
but still some places make you pay. And in Europe, where I live,
free WiFi is unheard of . . .
To be honest, I would almost prefer a different company's
phone + a Touch with 3G AND WiFi that I could use as a music
player/pda. If Apple would unleash more of the power of the
touch, e.g. making Calendar more useful and integrated with the
desktop, it would be all the pda I need.
- 3G or EVDO data rates (I commute 2 hours to work by train with no wi-fi)
- 32 GB of Flash storage (then I can upgrade my iTunes library bit rates)
- Exchange e-mail connectivity via Windows Mobile support (on the way!)
I looked briefly at the iPod Touch. But, it would have to have a capacity of at least 80 Gigabytes, like my current iPod, to be worth the upgrade. A 64 Gig flash model is forseeable in a year or so, but until it's at least 128 Gigs, I'm happy with the one I have. Granted, once I start re-ripping my library at higher bit rates and storing more video content, I might need a higher capacity unit.
Of course, hard drives fail, and a dead iPod would force an upgrade. If that happened today, I might forgo iPods at all for awhile, as having one give out after only two years isn't very reassuring. But, if it were, say, lost or stolen, I'd replace it with a 160 Gig iPod Classic rather than the Touch. The Touch has the better screen, making it more useful for portable video--though I've also got a PSP that can with some work do some of that. The Touch would also work as a portable Internet device that's instant-on (no boot-up), useful for brief, on-the-fly Internet use. My mobile phone can do some of it, but the Touch has a full browser. Again, my PSP can do it, too.
In short, the newer lineup has some added features, but not enough to make me dump a perfectly good 5th gen. model, less than two years old.
lasted almost five years until thenhstd drive gave out. It happens
and if you are not willing to live without a iPod go ahead.
replace my desktop computers.
Anyway, I won't buy an iPod unless Apple decides to open up iTunes, make the iPod compatible with Windows Media Player, and if the hardware is actually decent.
I've owned a Creative Zen MicroPhoto, loved it, had it for 3 years, almost no problems (except for an occasional screen tint to blue), and then I bought a Zune for Christmas because I wanted something new. While the Zune definitely is not perfect, the hardware is amazing, with the huge 80 GB hard drive, great twist interface, and huge screen (not to mention an FM radio!). However, I would like to see Microsoft make the Zune compatible with Windows Media Player. It's not like it would hurt Microsoft. The one downside of the Zune is the Zune software. While it's interface is nice and simple, it has some annoying tweaks and glitches that make it unbearable to use. But that's my two cents.
iTunes works on two platforms(Windows and Mac) whereas a player that uses Windows Media DRM requires Windows Media Player, which ties you to Windows. That makes iTunes more compatible, not less.
If open up you mean open source it, I think that will happen right about when M$ open sources the current version of Windows Media Player and all the associated codecs. By that rationale you shouldn't even be using Windows.
Furthermore, who really likes Windows Media Player? The version with a good UI was 6.4. There is a reason that Media Player Classic, which uses the theme from Media Player 6.4 is so popular. Virtually everyone who I introduce Media Player Classic to likes it better than the current version of Windows Media Player.
and FLAC...
for the shuffle an audio user interface that allows one to interact with the ipod the same way as a classic, but it reads the options via headphoes since it has no screen
bluetooth update also
As for the company as a whole, the traditional Apple model, "plenty of reasons to love, not enough reasons to buy" continues to ring true in my mind. Just how many iPods does it take to get in bed with a MacBook anyway?
As time goes on Apple will obviously increase the capacity and slightly decrease the price as flash memory and hard drives for the iPod classic become less expensive, but beyond that the obvious updates disappear.
They could always add a FM Tuner, albeit I seriously doubt that is going to increase sales much. FM radio has became a vast wasteland so I doubt too many people find the lack of FM radio a deal breaker.
Another suggestion I have heard is to add stereo Bluetooth support. I could see them adding it on the high end models, but I can't realistically see Bluetooth support being too popular because the battery life on a lot of BT headsets is less than the iPod itself. Furthermore, you have one more battery to worry about being dead. BT headsets maybe chic, but there is little benefits to it beyond looking neat.
Good sound. Yes, I know, some people say that you can't hear the difference...yes you can...if you have a headphone amp and the right headphones.
No freakin' phone! No GPS! Don't care about these options and I don't want to pay for them!
music & PDA w/ my work calendar & most of my necessary
contacts, it's the reason i stopped wearing a watch-which i've
done since i was 8, now 54. the other is strictly for Video--
iTunes shorts & movies/concerts i've recorded from my HD cable
into an iMac then into iTunes as well as burned on DVD. i'm all
Mac & pretty happy in my Mac universe, w/ several Macs
ranging from 5 yr. old 17" 1GHz Flat Panel G4 to a MacBook--all
synched over my dotMac account over my secure Airport
network, which is handy. i don't want my entire library on my
iPod, so i have a core playlist of faves & another that i use to
change some of the songs as well as a few Podcasts i've enjoyed
subscribing to.
- It's great - until it dies.
- by Msorensen May 1, 2008 10:36 AM PDT
- I like the Classic. I bought my original 20GB ipod about 4 years ago. It failed after about 2 years, and I'm really glad I bought the extended warranty from Best Buy. They replaced it with an ipod Video 30GB. I have used the larger capacity, so I'm glad they upgraded the model. I really like the functionality of the ipod classic video, but mine is starting to have some problems again. I wouldn't buy a new one if this one kept working without any problems. I may be ready to trade it in soon though if these problems continue to get worse. I definitely recommend getting the replacement packages when you buy one. Other than the failure rate, I love the ipod.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 3 of 4 pages (98 Comments)