Comments on: Owners of unlocked iPhones hosed by software update
As warned, several owners of unlocked iPhones are reporting that the latest software update to the iPhone has rendered their phone essentially useless.
As warned, several owners of unlocked iPhones are reporting that the latest software update to the iPhone has rendered their phone essentially useless.
There were plenty of e-book readers on display at CES 2010, but many question whether the market for such dedicated devices can support all the new entrants.
Photos: E-readers at CES 2010
Vintage computer historians have long revered the Altair 8800. As it turns out, an unknown computer project at Sacramento State beat the Altair by three years.
Images: The first microcomputers
At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Now I don?t really like Apple, the products look cool but when it comes to actually achieving something I prefer to go down the open market as apposed to the closed one which is Apple.
As for the Iphone update which disables hacked phones, this is bad, real bad. Microsoft did try something like this with Windows Update however the backlash and legal intricacies of deleting/disabling peoples stuff was always going to ring bells and now update just gives you a nice message saying "this isn?t legal, get a legal copy?" this is what Apple should have done instead of going down the George Bush route.
CrApple indeed...
the update might break the device? What is that screenshot in the
story?
But your right in one respect. MicroSoft wouldn't have done that,
they would have to have a phone first. They seem to be doing well
with that game though.
I fail to see how apple should be held responsible if you apply a
standard update to a modified device. If you have modified the
device, then the update may not apply correctly, Apple is not
intentionally bricking phones :/
I guess given Apple's position in the market, they can do whatever they want.
I just updated it and it now says:
WAITING FOR ACTIVATION
WHAT THE HELL!!!! Its been activated already by AT&T
So each update I have to wait to get it activated?
This is the last ever update I am doing if each time I have to activate my phone service.
But the ice is finally starting to melt, its now fairly obvious that Steve Jobs is not God and that the Iphone will break just like the rest of the technological junk in your house. It will crash, reset, delete your numbers and all your girlfriends in one fell swoop...
This isn't uncommon for cellphone firmware updates. It's just more pronounced on the iPhone.
But imagine what scream we would hear if that did happen. People even complain that one cannot install updates (other than security fixes) on the "non-WGA-verified" systems.
Apparently, Apple is exempt from these standards.
Its apologists (AKA fanboys) don't even mind that people actually BOUGHT the dang thing for $600, not just copied a CD.
I'm not sure a story about a person going from Windows Media Center to Linux with 20-30 replies is considered 'Most Discussed' when compared to this iPhone update story with 200 replies isn't listed at all.
Just curious what criteria is used to actually have stories listed since it isn't obvious.
Looks like it's ready to happen in the next few weeks, from what I hear.
CNET here moved the content to the CRAVE site and all our comments here are hidden away. I could only get to this by going to a saved bookmark since the search on CNET now points to the new stripped down version.
Appleinsider had several stories about the iPhone update on their main page for news but now all that is gone and the only information are glowing comments about the update and what great features it offers.
Macrumors- well, yeah.
I'm not sure why it's happening, but it sure is awfully coincidental that all these sites suddently are losing the content at the same time. And since the content isn't there anymore, you can't say that it was removed either. What content? I don't see any.
Hmm.
Veeeery interesting coincidence indeed.
to hack it. The only people interested in this story are Linux geeks
who want to violate their agreement with Apple. Who cares about
them?
If Apple truely wants to make the IPhone become the next "motorola razr" they need to sell it unlocked and allowable to ANY carrier and let the purchaser decide which carrier to use. They need to resxolve the non-removable battery issue by making a removable battery version and they need to up the memory to something respectable like 16 to 32 gigs or make a slot available to use memory cards (ie SD or the like).
Until then the Iphone is just a very expensive Ipod (and I already have several of those laying around)
- by vcaobest May 4, 2009 10:36 PM PDT
- Apple has no liability to IDIOTS who bought the phone hoping to hack it morally or legally! YOU KNEW WHAT THE DEAL WAS WHEN YOU BOUGHT THE PHONE MORONS! http://www.vcao.net This isn't about Apple being a monopoly, or keeping people from making choices
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 3 of 3 pages (217 Comments)