Version: 2008

Comments on: Maine: A MacBook for each student in grades 7-12

The state's Department of Education commits to providing a notebook to every public-school student from middle school to high school, purchasing tens of thousands of the Apple laptops.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (149 Comments)
by revxx14 June 30, 2009 9:26 AM PDT
omg that's some major support for apple. I don't care for apple, but I'd be thrilled to get a free laptop to use during the school year. I'd prefer a Dell XPS or something lol.
Reply to this comment
by derilium June 30, 2009 10:47 AM PDT
we use macbooks at my school, but it's 2 students per macbook. it sucks cuz the IT guy screwed it all up. I mean like.. he put all the applications on a 802.11b network, so that every time you want to run an application, it downloads it from a network. he also sets up a quota, so that if you download too much data, you get kicked (logged out), and you lose all your data.

but then i figured out that i can put the .apps on a flashdrive :) and now i just use a 8GB flashdrive with all my personal apps like office 2008 insteada openoffice
by Bob Kakis June 30, 2009 11:37 AM PDT
It does not matter if it is Mac or PC, Maine should be commended for taking such an innovative, ground breaking initiative.

For American to prosper, Maine's example must be followed.

So, to all the trolls, please, just recognize the big picture and that that big picture is a very good thing for all!

Thanks Jim for a great report!
by gggg sssss July 1, 2009 5:35 PM PDT
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Now these klids will think that Apple makes real computers, not just cute toys. That anything that you can do on a Mac is at all worth while. Sad. None of these kids will ever build anything that can scan teh universe, diagnose an illness, launch a space station or solve global warming. They will be able to make cute pictures oif their cats and think that is a significant contribution to humanity. What a waste of a generation of students.
by DrtyDogg July 3, 2009 7:44 AM PDT
A few years ago my county dropped Apple PCs and switched to Dell's. But the only news reports that came from that was about the mahem of selling the used imacs at a steep discount.

http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-5835333-7.html?tag=mncol
by Random_Walk July 3, 2009 7:22 PM PDT
Meanwhile, on the Enterprise front...

http://blogs.computerworld.com/london_stock_exchange_to_abandon_failed_windows_platform

...and y'all wonder why Folks aren't automatically sucking in Windows purchases anymore...
by kieranmullen June 30, 2009 9:28 AM PDT
Some of those Macs will be running parallels I suppose so students can be taught about about other operating systems as well.



KieranMullen


[CNET editors' note: Promotional link removed]
Reply to this comment
by c4s2k3 June 30, 2009 9:47 AM PDT
Somehow I don't think the priority is to teach "operating systems." I suspect the focus in on educational software tools and how those may help improve the students' motivation to engage in the learning process.
by Spartan_458 June 30, 2009 9:50 AM PDT
Well then why aren't they using Windows? There are almost certainly more "education software tools" for Windows. And that's not to mention that, in the real world, those kids will most likely be using a Windows machine anyway.
by kast5089 June 30, 2009 9:53 AM PDT
It isn't as though Windows promotes the use (or even the mere awareness) of other operating systems.
by Random_Walk June 30, 2009 10:19 AM PDT
Perhaps, but most likely not (in reply to OP).

The reason why is simple: If you want to learn about other operating systems specifically, you install them, you crawl around in them... and you do it on bare-bones hardware. Most classes that teach at that level usually have desktops with removable hard disk carriages - each student has a hard disk assigned that he or she works on. You definitely do not use laptops for this purpose.

Apple has a ton of educational software, and (thanks to the FINK libraries) has access to most of Linux' educational software catalog as well. Combined, this pretty much dwarfs any catalog of Windows-only software insofar as education apps are concerned.
by c4s2k3 June 30, 2009 10:19 AM PDT
I don't know the particulars, but I'm guessing Maine school officials liked the educational software they would be getting with this arrangement and felt the students would be better served. Having 'more' "education software tools" does not necessarily mean 'better' tools.
by myles taylor June 30, 2009 11:11 AM PDT
The thing about Macs is they can install any Linux and Windows OS on them. This way they can teach their students about any OS. If the students want to wipe and install Windows they never have to use the Mac OS. It's basically the student's choice computer.
by Mergatroid Mania June 30, 2009 11:31 AM PDT
This is an absolute waste of money.

First, you use a car to drive around but you don't start driving around until you learn to use the car. So, to say it's not about learning to use an o/s is a misnomer.
They should not be learning how to use a computer that has such a tiny market share. When they graduate and go looking for work, does the school think their employer will be using Macs? The odds are against it. If I was a parent, I would be demanding my kid learn on something running the most common o/s.
Sure, a Mac can run both Apple and MS O/Ss but the fact is that the schools are not going to bother installing two O/Ss on these computers. Also, teaching kids how to install multiple O/Ss on a computer may be a good lesson for a computer class, but not for students doing their daily work.
And, what of those parents who have already purchased a Windows laptop for their kids? Are they just supposed to shelve this expensive compatible tool they have purchased just so their kid can learn to use a Mac?
What a waste of money. Might as well give them Linux laptops.
Don't kid yourself, kids graduating with a lifelong knowledge of Windoze have a better chance at most jobs than kids without that experience.
by Random_Walk June 30, 2009 11:43 AM PDT
"First, you use a car to drive around but you don't start driving around until you learn to use the car. So, to say it's not about learning to use an o/s is a misnomer."

Most kids these days (that aren't in Special Ed or hadn't ever seen a computer before) already know how to do basic tasks on an OS by the time they leave Kindergarten.
by birdtford June 30, 2009 11:47 AM PDT
People, the article is NOT about learning other operating systems. It's about the use of the laptops for education. It doesn't matter if it's Mac, Windows or Linux.
by kast5089 June 30, 2009 11:53 AM PDT
@Mergatroid Mania: It isn't as though learning one system precludes learning another. By the time these kids grow up, they'll all be working in multi-platform environment anyway.
See more comment replies
by flickrz June 30, 2009 9:29 AM PDT
Hmm.. Still won't increase Mac market share by more than 0.01%.
Reply to this comment
by mikestatic1 June 30, 2009 10:04 AM PDT
Ha ha... GOOD ONE!!
by workiscool June 30, 2009 10:14 AM PDT
Not today. Think long term. 90% of these kids will probably never buy a PC in the future.
by mediocrates--2008 June 30, 2009 10:51 AM PDT
@ workiscool

Oh really? Have we forgotten that "Apples for the students" program back in the 80's, that increased the Mac market share by about 0.01%
by phess11 June 30, 2009 10:55 AM PDT
Sure they will buy PC in the future. That is what the real world uses. 98% of business use PCs. If they want to do work at home, in the most economic way, they will buy PCs.
by jasonaorr June 30, 2009 11:46 AM PDT
@phess11

One of the most successful things Apple has done in the past ten years or so is make their software more compatible with the mainstream Windows OS and with Microsoft's dominating Office suite. This makes it very possible for users of Apple PCs to interact with machines using other operating systems. Although engineers using CAD likely won't use Macs any time soon, I think it's decreasingly accurate to say that Windows at work necessarily means Windows at home.
by illil0 June 30, 2009 12:03 PM PDT
I find it funny that my school district used Macs and at the time, it just frustrated me. I remember hating them and always looked forward to working in the PC computer lab vs. the Macs everywhere else. I apparently got over it and exclusively use Macs now. Maybe it did work?
by workiscool June 30, 2009 12:11 PM PDT
@mediocrates--2008

Mac has come a long way since then. They totally transformed the brand. PC makers are losing the youth market and they know it.
by Mark_Anderson July 1, 2009 11:30 AM PDT
@workiscool

Youth market? Who cares. They'll use PCs when they grow up just like the generations before them.

Apple have always had a strong presence in education but have always failed to make the transition to the corporate environment.
by pentest July 3, 2009 2:58 PM PDT
Macs are somewhere north of 10% overall and still seeing a double digit growth rate.

In laptops it is much higher.

Go on any campus, mac books are more common then any other brand of laptop.
by pentest July 3, 2009 3:00 PM PDT
These kids will be buying macs at home regardless of what is used at work.

Thank you for pointing out that windows users are too stupid to use anything else.
See more comment replies
by Someone-else June 30, 2009 9:35 AM PDT
Well... it was a great opportunity for Linux, using it would be much cheaper and the results would be about the same.
Reply to this comment
by togamoos June 30, 2009 9:56 AM PDT
Agreed. Plus using Linux would dissuade students from attempting to install stuff and winding up with malware, etc.

I would NOT want to be the IT administrator in charge of a bunch of teens with Macbooks. I think this is a great initiative, but I wonder if they even considered Linux.
by Random_Walk June 30, 2009 10:23 AM PDT
Linux would work, and has made great strides in education (Google for "LTSP" as one of many examples).

OTOH, Macs are not as hard to administer as you may think - it's all BSD in there, and w/o sudo rights, the student won't be able to do too awful much (and preparation for the next kid? Wiping the student's home directory and Applications directory, replacing the latter with the std. pile of apps is pretty straightforward, no?)
by SiliconValleyJoe June 30, 2009 10:26 AM PDT
OS-centric versus user-centric, a typical problem with many. Not a problem with engineers who have been around the block a few times and understand business requirements.

Does Linux come ready to use right out of the box?
Does Linux require individual set-up by an IT administrator?
Does Linux have a host of tech support ready to assist in a school environment?
Does Linux support Pod Casting of lessons from universities right out of the box?

As for IT administrator in charge of a bunch of teens, there will always be a few hacker-teens around but the rest are just eager to get work done to earn a good grade for the next step, getting into college. OS/X also has user access control like that of UNIX, why is there a problem?

A school system is different than a corporate environment and is different than your own in-home environment.
by Random_Walk June 30, 2009 10:32 AM PDT
Err, the questions you pose are 3/4 "yes" (most schools have in-house IT support, and most major distros these days -Ubuntu, RHEL, and SuSE- have paid support options). The last 1/4 is a strawman, since Internet streaming video standards are the rule, not iTunes specific podcasting.
by Vegaman_Dan June 30, 2009 11:27 AM PDT
@Random_Walk:

" (most schools have in-house IT support, and most major distros these days -Ubuntu, RHEL, and SuSE- have paid support options). "

It is apparent you don't work for a school district. School districts have IT departments meant to support the school's infrastructure *only*. And that means typically a team of 5-10 people for a larger school district. They don't maintain a help desk that you can call or go to. It is also one of the first departments to get hit by the budget ax. You could not possibly be suggesting this same team of 5-10 people suddenly be responsible for 2000+ extra systems on a platform they cannot support (OS X) without being forced to send the units in to an Apple center for repair. That's... ridiculous.

As for the linux distros- that's nice, but again, they don't have call centers that are free and you're now asking the school district to pay even more for support? How much more money are you going to expect them to pay for this product?

For a 'free' product, it sure gets highly expensive fast. The school would need to hire additional staff to support this and that would come at the expense of teachers who are already being laid off. I'm not sure I'd want to toss out education of the students in favor of them having a free laptop to use for their classes... without teachers.
by Random_Walk June 30, 2009 11:41 AM PDT
"School districts have IT departments meant to support the school's infrastructure *only*."

Individual schools OTOH usually have anywhere from 0-a dozen or more, depending on the size of the school (e.g. the ones with "0" are in, say, small elementary schools with no classroom infrastructure to speak of).

"As for the linux distros- that's nice, but again, they don't have call centers that are free"

Neither does Microsoft - where do you think a goodly chunk of that licensing money goes? ;)
(and if the school or district has an SA or EA license, then support credits are often sold/itemized separately).
by Lerianis3 June 30, 2009 12:32 PM PDT
Linux is not a solution to malware problems, togamoos. The fact is that Windows XP, Vista or 7, when run CORRECTLY, will never get a virus on them.

The main sources of viruses are: iffy websites, people downloading programs that are iffy, and people downloading things off p2p networks.
Now, I do ALL THREE OF THOSE THINGS, and I very rarely get a virus.
by SiliconValleyJoe June 30, 2009 12:50 PM PDT
@Random-Walk,

Unfortunately, you need to deal with a school district to understand their challenges. As a parent, I deal with them day in and day out. As a volunteer, specifically in the IT area, I see first hand what happens in our local district in California.

Some districts have a staff of 2-3 technicians/IT/do-everything people followed by a staff of 5 or 6 parent volunteers who can help when they have time. The rest are teachers who need specific things done to a set of machines and they cannot wait for the 3 technicians. When the teachers cannot handle it (most cannot), they will ask for help from class parents or parent volunteers. These schools try to be as self-sufficient. Linux, unfortunately, will be beyond the capabilities of 95% of our teachers. They can learn but they need to focus on teaching and creating teaching material, not system administration and maintenance and set-up.

Unless you know of a version of Linux that I can install on my PC or Mac and it instantly recognizes my WiFi and can auto-detect and set-up mail accounts and allows quick security administrative UI, it is a no-go from the get-go.

All that said, now we come to hardware problems.

Without naming brands and OS, certain "cheaper" machines do not last. They are often breaking down at the two-year mark and by the third year, they are close to "junk" status. Kids are normally very good with the machines and loaners, you will be surprised by how responsible 99% of them are. Unfortunately, the wear and tear do wear them out. These machines do also lock up more often than we like but with a few old spare on-hand, it is just a swap and dump routine. When they crash, and they do crash often, it is often a simple reboot and on occassion, about 5% of the time, we have to reinstall everything from scratch.

If a few volunteer parents have any say, we would actually recommend certain other brand of machines that can run any number of OS on the market. These machines are reliable, tend to last more than five years under intensive daily use in business (software product development) environment. They are also easy to set up and easy to manage. About 30% of our kids already own these machines at home and some bring their laptops to school to use alongside friends who use the school machines.

When it comes to "live streaming", you are avoiding the issue. Go on-line and look up university pod casting and you will find it is very popular amongst educational institutions. Many of our high school students attending local junior colleges are taking such cases, via pod cast. They load them up on their machines or iPods and use them at home or on field trips. The pod casts subjects spread from Physics to Math to LAnguage art to Geology to CS. Where are the live streaming of such subjects that a student can "own" and carry around?

THis is why I say it is not just someone believing in the potential of a technology and then run around looking for solution to address each issue that comes up. That is a start-up mentality not applicable to a school.

A school focuses on teaching and the goal is all about getting the teaching material out to teachers so they can run their classes for the students. They need solutions that can do that NOW and at minimum cost and with minimum problems. If there is an OS or a machine that approaches that ideal solution, it is what they will consider.

From a volunteer's perspective from one state, one local school district, limited to one segment of our school population, I will say that Maine made a good choice. The Macbooks will likely make their short-handed staff a bit happier in the long run.
by jumpjetta June 30, 2009 4:02 PM PDT
Please. And what mainstream software would you run on any flavor of Linux?? Virtually nothing. Certainly not real productivity suites like CS4.
by Draxon June 30, 2009 4:22 PM PDT
Unlike I would say 99% of the people who posted on this article I do actually work in IT for a school district, I'm the NIS and am in charge of 32 schools, we are about 3/4 Mac and 1/4 windows. First off to anyone advocating Linux I'm sorry but the thing you need to realize is this choice always comes down to the person who has to sign off on the Bill and for a large purchase such as 64,000 laptops this is going to be someone high up in the department and if they can't use linux they will not purchase it, so linux is out.

One of the main advantages of macs is that you can create one image that will work on all macs, drivers are not an issue that means they can image all laptops they buy with the same image no matter what year or model the laptop is.
See more comment replies
by man_w_balls June 30, 2009 9:35 AM PDT
amazing that they would let the kids take those laptops home - half will probably be broken by irresponsible kids. Maybe it's a good time to open a Mac repair shop in Maine...
Reply to this comment
by Sporlo June 30, 2009 10:30 AM PDT
Unless they tell them that they'll be paying for it if it's over a certain cost.
by myles taylor June 30, 2009 11:08 AM PDT
We just unloaded 470 Macbooks that Apple shipped to us from a school in Texas. Same deal. Most of them need top cases and bezels with a few needing other parts. In the summer, most of these schools ship these machines out to be repaired and Apple contracts out with Apple Service Providers like us. These are from a high school and last year we did a middle school. They are surprisingly well taken care of.
by myles taylor June 30, 2009 11:08 AM PDT
Oh and user damage is not covered. If a student breaks the machine, they are responsible for the cost of fixing it.
by darkxeno June 30, 2009 11:13 AM PDT
Of course they will be in good shape when returned cause in the fine print the school will charge a parent double the cost of the machine if a kid damages. So the school buys them for lets say $500 then the kid breaks it so they charge close to the retail value of the machine to the family $1,000.
Just like when we all where younger and the school charge us for books we destroyed. School cost one book $100 cost to kids parents for said book that needs replaced $200.
by Lerianis3 June 30, 2009 12:35 PM PDT
myles taylor gets it right. People keep on ******** about children being so 'rough' with things.... they are not in all honesty, unless the things belong to THEM ALONE!
With things that belong to someone else? Precious diamonds, treat them well! (sing this with me) I have NEVER seen a kid intentionally break something unless (and this is the one exception) the person whose stuff they break has gone OUT OF THEIR WAY to **** the child off, and they are not thinking clearly when they break the thing in question.
I broke a game controller one time when my friend did that when I was 12.... didn't even realize I was holding the controller so tightly that I actually BROKE IT IN HALF WITH ONE HAND.
by Lerianis3 June 30, 2009 12:39 PM PDT
by darkxeno June 30, 2009 11:13 AM PDT
Of course they will be in good shape when returned cause in the fine print the school will charge a parent double the cost of the machine if a kid damages. So the school buys them for lets say $500 then the kid breaks it so they charge close to the retail value of the machine to the family $1,000.
Just like when we all where younger and the school charge us for books we destroyed. School cost one book $100 cost to kids parents for said book that needs replaced $200.
___________________________________

No school does that anymore. I had a few books that 'went through the wringer' in school, and my parents did NOT have to pay twice the value of the book for 'kid damages'.... they just paid the value of the book (or in some cases, the value of the NEW EDITION of the book that the school was buying anyway!) and done.
If these schools tried to charge these kids twice the value of something..... LAWSUIT TIME! That is ILLEGAL in most states, and if the schools haven't been slapped for it, it is because no one has been willing to bring a case to court yet.
by Mongobear June 30, 2009 9:43 AM PDT
After the kids have used Mac's from 7th thru 12th, what do you think they will want to use later in life. This is brilliant on Apple's part.
Reply to this comment
by ewsachse June 30, 2009 9:51 AM PDT
Wrong

Every kid in public school in the 80's used Apple II computers in school. Did not keep any of us from using PC's in college and buying PC's after graduating college.
PC's were used in professional jobs, while Apples were only used in secondary schools. The same still applies today.
by togamoos June 30, 2009 9:58 AM PDT
LOL @ "Wrong" followed by anecdotal evidence. I'm going to start saying that to peoples' opinions today. "Wrong!"
by wizlb June 30, 2009 10:10 AM PDT
It's not anecdotal evidence when it's commonly known. Apple _used to be_ big in schools and now pretty much nobody uses them.

I'm sure that these kids will NOT want to use Macs when they graduate because, well ummm once you start using it you realize what a toy it is compared to Windows.
by jordanking34 June 30, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
They're not just using the laptops in school, they're using them at home as well, so it's probably their primary computer. Why would they then switch to Windows after 6 years of OS X? I mean, clearly college kids hate Macs. And even if they had to use Windows, they can just run it on their Macs. The technological landscape is very different than in the 1980s, and I think Mongobear has a pretty good point.
by umbrae June 30, 2009 10:15 AM PDT
No, just like today everything they learn in school with be completely useless to them in real life.
by Random_Walk June 30, 2009 10:27 AM PDT
y'all forget something: Back in the 1980's, a typical "computer class" in a high school had a handful of Apple IIe's that had to be shared among all students. Nowadays? these kids will be taking the machines home and will have plenty of time to explore them.

The rest is just fevered fanboy fantasy
by cb3431 June 30, 2009 10:43 AM PDT
We had a MAC when I was growing up and I have never purchased a MAC. I had to use a MAC in a few classes in college and hated every second of it.
by Perry_Clease June 30, 2009 11:17 AM PDT
"by cb3431 June 30, 2009 10:43 AM PDT
We had a MAC when I was growing up and I have never purchased a MAC. I had to use a MAC in a few classes in college and hated every second of it."

I know how you feel. Sometimes I have to use my "Pc" and hate it with its clunky and ugly interface, horrid system colors, and constant fear of getting it infected with malware.
by Mergatroid Mania June 30, 2009 11:45 AM PDT
How's this for "fevered fanboy fantasy":

OK son, good interview. You seem to have good grades, and we are definately hiring. Unfortunately, I see you have been doing all your work on a Mac. For this position we require people with experience using XXX software along with YYY and ZZZ on MS WIndows 7 (or XP or Vista or whatever).
Out of the 25 candidates I have interviewed you're the only one with no experience in Windows. Our entire office uses Windows machines, and all the software we use runs on those machines. I would recommend you take a course on using Windoes and if available the same software we use here. But, at least learn Windows and come back when you've finished the course. We may still have a job for you.
by Perry_Clease July 1, 2009 7:16 AM PDT
"For this position we require people with experience using XXX software along with YYY and ZZZ""

Do you mean Word or Excel? Good point because they are not available on the Mac. Now if you mean some piece of vertical market software used in a specific industry then that is probably not taught in the high schools.
by esteven4 June 30, 2009 9:50 AM PDT
It's nice that the schools are embracing technology. At my high school (and I only graduated a year ago), the only storage option for students was the floppy disk. I knew how to use a flash drive, of course, and educated everyone else, but the official policy was floppy only.

I had an odd relationship with the head of the tech department... she couldn't do anything to stop me from using the flash drive, because I had to show her how to do a lot of stuff.
Reply to this comment
by Mergatroid Mania June 30, 2009 11:49 AM PDT
Actually, all she had to do was fill the USB ports with hot melt glue or something similar.

Something that likely should have been done when the computers were purchased.
by 8ball629 June 30, 2009 9:51 AM PDT
That's ridiculous. Why waste money on MacBooks when you could grab a laptop sufficient for writing papers and doing homework with a Linux distro for about 1/5 the price? Maybe they got an outstanding deal but I doubt they are getting them for ~$300 a piece.
Reply to this comment
by gary85739 June 30, 2009 9:53 AM PDT
Seems resonable...
by mikestatic1 June 30, 2009 10:05 AM PDT
I'm going to guess they were a little more informed about the deal than you are.
by getwired June 30, 2009 10:09 AM PDT
Yes, because teachers should have to learn how to update Linux distros and browsers in order to help students with the basics.
by El_Segfaulto June 30, 2009 10:23 AM PDT
You make a really good point. You can get a refurb Acer Netbook for $250.00 retail. I have to imagine the school disctrict could get a better deal. Sounds like Apple lobbyists were successful.
by 8ball629 June 30, 2009 11:10 AM PDT
@mikestatic1
Yes, I'm assuming that the MacBooks were overpriced for the schools just like they are for your average consumer.

@getwired
Anyone incapable of hitting an update button shouldn't own a laptop in the first place. You can even get laptops running Windows for the price I mentioned. I don't hate Macs or anything but I don't think it's the most cost affective solution for the school system but then again I may be wrong.
by danielwsmithee June 30, 2009 11:39 AM PDT
You guys also need to think of resale value. Yes a Macbook costs more upfront, with the quantities they have ordered with educational pricing my guess is they are paying around $700 a pop.

Then you look at what a 2-3 year old MacBook sails for used. Macs have extraordinary resale value. On ebay right now, 3 year old MacBooks are going for $500. So we assume the district sells of the MacBooks to a liquidator in mass for about $350 each. The district then pays $350 buck per MacBook for a 3 year period.

Combine that with Apple's support, expertise, and ease of management in an educational market and it easy to see why the district would choose MacBooks over a cheaper PC.
by 8ball629 June 30, 2009 11:46 AM PDT
@danielwsmithee
Good point but are they really going to sell them after 3 years and are they going to be in good condition? I mean... the text books we used when I went to school were probably cycled every 6 years or so with the exception of the more time sensitive subjects such as History, Government, Geography, etc.
by Mergatroid Mania June 30, 2009 11:54 AM PDT
Right, I'm sure that was the number one thing on the school boards mind when they made this purchase.

"Hhmmmm, what do you suppose the resale value is on those Dells Frank?", "Well, I'd say about half the resale value of the Mac Books."

"Well, that settles it, we'll go for the Mac Books, resell them in a couple of years and use the money for a vacation in Mexico."

Yep, that must have been their number one priority.
by pentest July 3, 2009 3:08 PM PDT
That laptop that is 1/5 the cost is going to be crapped out by the end of the school year.
by pentest July 3, 2009 3:09 PM PDT
"Yes, because teachers should have to learn how to update Linux distros and browsers in order to help students with the basics."

So you are saying teachers wouldn't have to update OSX or windows including browsers?

You are correct, that is what IT is for.

BTW, updating Linux including browsers is a 1-click affair. I am sure that mythical tech support giving teacher can figure it out.
See more comment replies
by gary85739 June 30, 2009 9:52 AM PDT
Good for Apple...maybe some day ALL school children will carry NETBOOKS, more than enough to hold ALL their curriculum/books downloaded for the entire school year,etc...

No more HEAVY backpacks,etc...
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease June 30, 2009 10:09 AM PDT
See Governor Swarzenegger's etextbook proposal for California

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Economy/story?id=7827997&page=1
by Vegaman_Dan June 30, 2009 11:29 AM PDT
Netbooks would be an excellent choice. They could be running a free version of Linux to keep those fanboys happy. The repair cost would be... just replace the machine. Don't bother repairing it. Limited exposure, a great cost savings to the school district, and make sure the students weren't using the machines to play WoW or other time wasters.
by serialvibe June 30, 2009 10:00 AM PDT
And you wonder how those americans sunk the world into a recession.

I love my mac. But anyone that sits there trying to sell the idea that learning to use an apple is more benifitial to education is smoking crack or just plain clueless.

Are they going to teach a course on imovie? itunes perhaps?
Reply to this comment
by mikestatic1 June 30, 2009 10:08 AM PDT
They are probably more focused on problem-free computing that helps the kids learn versus subjecting them to an operating system that becomes the focal point of the learning.

You ought to look for a few clues, because you obviously aren't a thinking person. The opinions of ignorant people need not be shared.
by Sporlo June 30, 2009 10:35 AM PDT
They're not teaching the MacBook, they're using the MacBook as a medium to teach their own curriculum. Why would you teach an OS to middle and high school students? That has no worth. They want the MacBooks to enhance whatever the teachers have to teach.
by Mergatroid Mania June 30, 2009 12:04 PM PDT
Pretty hard to use a computer if you don't know how to use the o/s.
Since the teaching of the o/s would be incidental to the course material, better to teach them something they can use when they graduate than something used by such a small market.
Of course a small cheap netbook running Linux would probably have been a better choice. As someone pointed out, they are so cheap they can be easily replaced, the o/s doesn't need constant updating but is still easy enough to do for people who can press a button.
And for the rest of us, once you click on the icon for launching the software, the focal point would be the software, not the O/S. However, since you have to use the O/S anyway, you're bound to learn something about it, that is unless you're a Mac fan with your hands over your ears and a blindfold over your eyes, humming loudly.
by notnecessarily June 30, 2009 12:26 PM PDT
It's not teaching ABOUT computers. it's teaching WITH computers. Many schools don't grasp this difference.
by c4s2k3 June 30, 2009 1:35 PM PDT
@notnecessarily:

Agree. Apparently a lot of people on this comment thread do not grasp that difference either :-)
by pentest July 3, 2009 3:14 PM PDT
Talk about shortsighted.

I guess if they were using windows laptops you would be saying they will teach WMP, their third rate movie maker program, and um itunes.
by pentest July 3, 2009 3:15 PM PDT
"Pretty hard to use a computer if you don't know how to use the o/s. "

Yeah, pretty hard to click on buttons.

You MS fanboys love to put your stupidity on display.
by pentest July 3, 2009 3:16 PM PDT
"Agree. Apparently a lot of people on this comment thread do not grasp that difference either :-)"

That is because windows users spend half their time on their computers doing maintenance.
by fgsdfgdsfgdsfg June 30, 2009 10:03 AM PDT
i would prefer a windows pc myself as opposed to a mac. personally i think the state is doing a dis-service to itself and its students. they should teach the students to use the operating system they are most likely to encounter in the real world business enviroment. Macs aint it, and they ain;t going to be it for a long long time.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease June 30, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
Just because you like to wear a cilice is no reason to brutalize school children by making them use Windows.
by Sporlo June 30, 2009 10:37 AM PDT
So many people are missing the point here. It doesn't matter what OS they're using. The point is that the computers will help the students learn. The fact that they might be using Windows later in life has nothing to do with anything. It's not hard to learn an OS. They just believe that Apple has better education software, etc. to help the students learn.
by Vegaman_Dan June 30, 2009 11:31 AM PDT
@Perry_Clease:

Just because you like OS X is no reason to brutalize school children by making them conform to your ideals.

Think different- let them make their own choices instead of you deciding what is good for them.
by ballmerisanape June 30, 2009 1:33 PM PDT
Should they wait for Windows 7 then? Also.. do you really think that learning OS X precludes you from using a mouse and opening word on a PC? These kids are likely going to be using windows and the mac os.. and... as a result.. actually be more tech savvy. If you think using Windows exclusively = tech preparedness... just look around at the monkeys in your office.. look how tech savvy they are.. hell... The Mac/PC people I work with tend to be more tech savvy than our Windows-centric IT staff.
by mikestatic1 June 30, 2009 10:06 AM PDT
This really isn't a big deal, considering that in Maine most kids are married or working on the farm by the time they reach 7th grade
Reply to this comment
by sagesmith June 30, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
well said!
by Lerianis3 June 30, 2009 12:43 PM PDT
WRONG! The fact is that the mean age of marriage in Maine is 24! Now, if you are talking about Minnesota or ALABAMA..... yeah, then you are right.
by sagesmith June 30, 2009 10:11 AM PDT
I wonder if Maine realizes they will be producing more of the smarmy "cool" guys like in the Mac v PC commercial instead of PC geeks: smart people who will be capable of earning a living instead of bragging about their iLife from their Mom's basement?

What do I know though? I'm a just a geeky PC with a high-paying, in-demand programming job.
Reply to this comment
by workiscool June 30, 2009 10:23 AM PDT
Hmmm interesting. Of course, these kids could wind up actually enjoying education slightly more than they did yesterday. Possibly get slightly better grades and open themselves up to more ways to make a living.

But what do I know? I'm just a smarmy mac user who will stop working well before most drones thanks to my high-paying creative job and design business.
by Random_Walk June 30, 2009 11:12 AM PDT
"I'm a just a geeky PC with a high-paying, in-demand programming job."

Of course you are. I bet you're also 6'4", athletic, married to a supermodel, and have 14 mistresses - six of whom work as actresses in the porn industry. You probably live in a beach house on Maui, and have a quintuple-black-belt in 52 different martial arts as well... of course, this is only when you're not saving children by the thousands in (insert 3rd-world country here), or paling around with Obama and the Bushes on their days off...

(...do you get the idea that simple assertion doesn't mean much around here? ;) ).
by kast5089 June 30, 2009 12:00 PM PDT
Seriously dude: don't be a ******. I prefer Macs and I am also a programmer in a high-paying, in-demand job. The difference between us: you're the smarmy guy.
by sanjayb July 2, 2009 10:08 AM PDT
@sagesmith

I would be careful. Chances are that one of these kids will be your boss and fire your ass once your in-demand programming job gets outsourced!
by pentest July 3, 2009 3:18 PM PDT
Not likely sage, given your lack of reading comprehension.

.net "programming" is API monkey work, not real programming.
by tlinget June 30, 2009 10:13 AM PDT
Expensive, yes. But I would guess the IT support for the schools are limited at best. Hardware cost pales in comparison to software and IT support costs.

There is a similar program at my son's high school. Of course, as part of the Macbook for every student program, you are required to agree to be financially responsible for your child's care of the notebook. That is, if he/she breaks it, you pay for it. It is highly suggested you buy an expensive insurance policy to protect you and your student in the event of such an occurance.

Your son or daughter must also agree to not to use the notebook inappropriately. I know this is standard, but I feel one should expect students to most likely do so. Fortunately, my son never brought his home. I don't like the idea of a school computer on my network at home. They probably would key log and track everything on that computer and potentially could have access to your network if you allowed it to connect to your network for internet use. Just a your place of work or business reels at the thought of allowing personal computers or devices to connect to their network for the threat of virus or other malicious attacks, I would have the same feeling as letting a school computer connect to mine.
Any faulty security on that machine could leave your network at risk. You, as a parent, do not have control over the school computer or its settings. It may be a moot point for some, but I try to minimize my risk for mine.
I would even speculate that the Macbooks for middle school students would be more of a distraction than a learning tool.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan June 30, 2009 11:33 AM PDT
I'm not sure I'd want my kids to be responsible for the most expensive system on the market for consumer use. That seems finanically irresponsible to me. I'd rather see them deploy netbooks that can do everything that they need to in school, and the cost of replacement is limited to $300 or so instead of $1500-2000.
by Random_Walk June 30, 2009 11:46 AM PDT
...you do realize that parents do routinely let their kids (eventually) drive the family car, do you not? Care to take a stab at how much a typical family car costs, vs. a laptop? ;)
by Lerianis3 June 30, 2009 12:46 PM PDT
By Random_Walk June 30, 2009 11:46 AM PDT
...you do realize that parents do routinely let their kids (eventually) drive the family car, do you not? Care to take a stab at how much a typical family car costs, vs. a laptop? ;)
______________________________

They are also paying for INSURANCE that will pay for the cost of a new car. I totaled my parents car (which I had their permission to drive while mine was in the shop) 2 years ago..... they paid my parents 12,000 dollars for the car, more than enough to replace it if they bought a used one, but my father wanted a big truck for use up in West Virginia when they go up in the winter.
by lazycat202 June 30, 2009 2:17 PM PDT
Vegaman":

well said! i would prefer my kids carry $300 netbooks; not $1500-$2000 machines.
by Vegaman_Dan June 30, 2009 2:40 PM PDT
@Random_Walk:

"...you do realize that parents do routinely let their kids (eventually) drive the family car, do you not? "

And you do realize we're talking about a computer and not a car, right? Or are you now suggesting that the school should be giving cars out to the kids too? You'll be a popular one with those kids. :)

But consider that most parents would not be buying their kids new cars with warranties and service contracts, but instead will be buying the $1000 first cars that have no support at all are meant to be used for more than school. Your point is interesting, but flawed.
by pentest July 3, 2009 3:19 PM PDT
Do you have any windows machines on your network? If so why the concern for security?
by pentest July 3, 2009 3:20 PM PDT
"And you do realize we're talking about a computer and not a car, right? Or are you now suggesting that the school should be giving cars out to the kids too?"

You are truly ignorant Dan.
by ATOBDavis June 30, 2009 10:22 AM PDT
uh....i really dont think kids in 7th grade need to be taught an operating system. This wont be their first experience with a fancy computing machine.

This is about money, marketing, and elected officials trying to look like they are doing something "for the children"
Reply to this comment
by Sporlo June 30, 2009 10:41 AM PDT
Again, it's not the OS. Why would it be about the OS?????? It's meant to be used as a learning tool. It's not hard to learn an OS anyway. The teachers can show them the basics of using it, but after that the students can then USE it learn.
by Mergatroid Mania June 30, 2009 12:08 PM PDT
Which is exactly why maybe netbooks running Linux would have been a better choice. They would have cost less, and would still have all the software a student needs.
by kast5089 June 30, 2009 4:30 PM PDT
@ Mergatroid Mania: Wait a minute. Aren't you the one arguing these kids should be using Windows because you fear they won't be able to get jobs in the "real world" or some such nonsense? And then you turn around and advocate Linux? Come on. If you're going to make terrible arguments, at least make them consistently.
by Vegaman_Dan June 30, 2009 10:22 AM PDT
Let's put the whole Mac vs PC debate aside for the moment. I'm curious how a state whose education budget doesn't have enough money to pay for the current number of teachers and is faced with layoffs can possibly afford to spend MORE money on laptops to give to students- but then I found the answer:

Maine School Districts face budget shortfalls:

http://morningsentinel.mainetoday.com/news/local/5915281.html


Maine School Districts have $190 million budget shortfall for 2008-2009

http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080317/GJNEWS_01/545919647


Maine School Districts out of cash turn to Federal Stimulus package to pay for new laptops:

http://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewiStockNews/articleid/3270041


That's right- Maine isn't paying for the laptops- you are. Or rather all the citizens of the United States gets to pay for this project insteaed since Maine can't afford it. Personally, I would have thought paying for more teachers and fixing up the existing infrastructure of the school districts would be more important than what essentially is corporate sponsorship, but apparently I am in the minority.

I'd rather spend the money on education, not toys. Give a kid a laptop they don't have to pay for and they won't take the same care of it that they would if they owned it. This has been tried before in other states and the laptops are basically junk at the end of the year. Some schools force the parents to then pay for repairs and that can be rather pricey, or they just have the tax payers eat the costs. Either way, it's not a good solution.

If they want to offer laptops, make a deal with the OEM for a very deep discount instead. Don't make the tax payers pay Apple for laptops when we have teachers being cut back and laid off.
Reply to this comment
by ATOBDavis June 30, 2009 10:30 AM PDT
Nice catch Dan....sounds like Stimulus Package is the new way to say "please take all my money for things ill never see".

Awesome.
by Random_Walk June 30, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
...did you ever stop to consider how much money textbooks normally run per classroom, per year? A single high school classroom with 25 kids per period , loaning textbooks out per semester to each student... That usually eats 175-200 textbooks for the one classroom (assuming 6-8 periods per day, and not counting spares, desk copies, etc). Each textbook runs roughly $25-$60, depending on subject, complexity, publisher, etc. Multiply that by, say, 50 classrooms in a smallish high school, and with a rough average of $45/book, a typical small(ish) high school gets to pay roughly $450k per year just in books. This of course doesn't count losses, theft, vandalism, wear/tear, storage costs, etc.

Break it down another way - to a per-student basis? It costs $2520 per kid in bound paper textbooks over a four-year period (assuming an avg. cost of $45/book, 7 class periods per day, and 2 semesters). replace that with one laptop containing all the books the kid needs, you have a ton of change left over after buying the kid an $900 (rough bulk discount) MacBook laptop, eBooks to fill it, and even buying AppleCare on it for four years... a time period not improbable at all, given the average Apple computer's lifetime (even most businesses will stretch cheap PC's out to 3 year cycles).

...and we haven't even touched on the storage and shipping fees that textbooks usually come with.

Plus I'm very sure that if Maine bought Windows-based laptops instead, you'd be among the first to cheer it - price be damned. ;)
by Vegaman_Dan June 30, 2009 11:35 AM PDT
Yeah... this article has been floating around the net for a few days now before CNET brought it up, but the link I gave is the one that shows that the penniless Maine school districts will have to ask for federal funds to pay for this.

When a state can't afford to keep enough teachers on staff to teach the students, having them turn around and spend money on laptops seems irresponsible.
by Mergatroid Mania June 30, 2009 12:10 PM PDT
@Vegaman_Dan

Good point.
by Vegaman_Dan June 30, 2009 2:47 PM PDT
@Random_Walk:

High school text books are not currently available as downloadable electronic content. Some college content is, but this is still a new area. High school students will be forced to carry both laptop and a stack of books. So your entire point about text book costs simply does not apply.

Besides, the school districts aren't applying to federal funds for textbooks. They *are* applying to get funds for laptops. Wouldn't you rather have them keep teachers employed than spend money on laptops?

I'd rather have teachers in schools teaching kids than handing them a laptop instead.
by Perry_Clease July 1, 2009 7:21 AM PDT
"High school text books are not currently available as downloadable electronic content."

Your right Dan, but I bet that you turn that text book into a PDF.
by Vegaman_Dan July 1, 2009 3:16 PM PDT
@Perry_Clease:

"Your right Dan, but I bet that you turn that text book into a PDF."

No, that would be illegal due to copyright infringement. Only the publisher of the text book could legally do that or authorize another group to perform the service. A school district would not want to be put into a legal liability by scanning and converting textbooks in such a manner.
by pentest July 3, 2009 3:21 PM PDT
It is money well spent Dan.

How about you worry about your own education, which is sorely lacking.
by kharris June 30, 2009 10:24 AM PDT
The support costs are factored into the deal and the price per laptop with support was better than quotes for other vendors.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis3 June 30, 2009 12:47 PM PDT
I highly doubt that! The fact is that most computers have 3 year warranties on them now (that is what HP is offering on their laptops) or you can get a 'replace and go' warranty for less than 150 dollars on a 300 dollar computer from HP.

That is still less than 1K per computer, not even factoring in repair costs.
by tlinget June 30, 2009 10:33 AM PDT
I bought an HP notebook recently and had bought one three years ago. The cost of "Accidental Insurance" for three years of coverage was around $240 for each. This included shipping and return of each notebook and any and all repairs regardless of the cause or fault. HP shines in this department.

School insurance for one half calendar school year of coverage of the Macbook was over $200. If your child's notebook was in need of repair, IT would have it sent off and hopefully, there is a spare for your child to use.
Reply to this comment
by darkxeno June 30, 2009 10:43 AM PDT
Im sure they have plenty of spares cause we cant have a kid not learning..
Hell PC or Mac either way Im still going to make money on IT support because someone is bound to mess them both up.
by The_happy_switcher June 30, 2009 10:49 AM PDT
The three kinds of computer users:
1. Uber Nerds: Linux users
2. Poindexters: Windows users.
3. Normal people who believe a computer should be used and not require tinkering/maintenance every other minute: OS X

I saw bravo Maine.
Reply to this comment
by The_happy_switcher June 30, 2009 10:52 AM PDT
I 'say' bravo Maine, that is. oops.
by Magallanes June 30, 2009 11:18 AM PDT
1.smartasses
2.normal.
3.dumb.
by Vegaman_Dan June 30, 2009 11:36 AM PDT
4. People who aren't so elitist as to believe their lives are dictated by their choice of OS. Those people tend to just use the machines and don't bother with forcing their ideals and religion on others.
by Lerianis3 June 30, 2009 12:52 PM PDT
magallanes, right exactly. Linux users are pretty much smartasses who think that "WE are better than you are..... even though our OS is still an also-ran and always will be!....... GASP! (heart attack!)"
Windows users: normal people who realize that a sophisticated piece of hardware like a computer NEEDS regular maintenance, and uh...... my PC? Maintenance MAYBE once a week, and that's only running CCleaner and defragging the hard drive (usually do that more like once a MONTH!)
OSX Users? Dumb people who cannot realize that they are DRAMATICALLY overpaying for an OS that has JUST AS FREAKING MANY PROBLEMS AS WINDOWS DOES.... in fact, on a more regular basis than Windows does!

I have yet to EVER have a Windows machine get messed up unless: 1. The hard drive fails (**** happens), 2. Someone has been mucking around where they don't belong (break their damned hands!), or 3. an uninstaller doesn't uninstall correctly (haven't seen this since Windows 98!).
by dragonwithaheadache June 30, 2009 1:28 PM PDT
I love people that have no clue about what they are talking about.

1. Linux - people that enjoy tinkering and puzzling out how to make a computer do something different.
2. Windows - People that either do not have the time to tinker or do not have the money for Apple or just enjoy Windows since it is still on top of the OS world
3. Apple - People like you that love to spout that apples is better even though the past two PWN2OWN comps it was the first to fail. OS X is not any better then Windows or Linux.

The one thing I didn't see mentioned is who is paying for all the MacBooks? Wasted Tax Dollars yet again.
by Dan7637 June 30, 2009 10:52 AM PDT
wow those kids in maine are lucky

i live in California and here the best we had for my history class was eMac's- they were so slow

even my macbook was better than the iMac's we had for computer art
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (149 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement