Comments on: Why is AT&T delaying rollout of iPhone tethering, MMS?
AT&T won't offer data tethering and MMS services when Apple launches its upgraded operating system for the iPhone, but the U.S. carrier says it will add it this summer.
AT&T won't offer data tethering and MMS services when Apple launches its upgraded operating system for the iPhone, but the U.S. carrier says it will add it this summer.
The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
Photos: Unboxing Nexus One
faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.
At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Don't let AT&T try to blow smoke in your face. The technology and capacity are there to use, like the German autobahn.
American carriers are trying to drive a 1974 Ford Pinto on it. While you are driving along at 62mph/100km/h many European and Asian carriers are blowing your doors off like a Nissan GT-R or a S-class Benz. Maybe the investment is too high. Who knows?
Softbank mobile here just introduced a Sharp clamshell model with a 10 Megapixal camera and digital TV receiver/recorder and a slot for a 16G microSD card. I am sure I will see Japanese high school kids with it soon. Yes, high school kids.
So what is Apple to do when some mobile phone companies outside of the U.S.A are able to utilize fully or exceed the capabilities of the Iphone while AT&T lumbers along like a camel??
It reminds of this old country song called "Mississippi Cotton Pickin Delta Town" by Charley Pride.
Remember to include the money Japan?s national and local governments use to subsidize Softbank each year. Divide that by 12, then divide that by the number of Softbank consumers. In USD, please.
For extra credit, tell us how a Japanese citizen without a cell phone (or who uses it as, OMG!, a phone only) feels about paying for a service he will never use.
Verizon HAS 80m customers, att has some 73....
Verizon is going have LTE 3 years before AT&T.
Verizon has a larger 3G Network
Verizon gets reception in a Washington DC Metro.
Verizon sends my messages faster
Verizon is BY FAR better than AT&T. Get your facts straight. I only switched for the iPhone
Thanks alot att& apple
Customer Service on the other hand is a completely different animal. T-Mobile has, by far the best customer service. Verizon is next. AT&T is dead last and last by a long way. Everything takes long on AT&T than any other carrier. I have two laptops. One came with a verizon Data Card and the other with an AT&T Data Card. The verizon card was up and running in twenty minutes with no call to verizon. AT&T has no option to activate the account without calling. Even then the process took two hours. Switching to AT&T took over an hour at the AT&T store.
The ONLY reason I have an iPhone is that it is the best phone I can get, for the US 3g GSM network. There are MANY great phones (HTC Touch HD for one) out there, but they do not support the US 3g GSM network. I'd go back to T-Mobile in a heartbeat, but there 3g network is years away for me and it requires both 1700 and 1900 bands. Most 3g GSM phones do not support that, iPhone included. Other 3g phones do 900, but you need 850 for AT&T. Very few phones support that. Right now the iPhone is it.
Apple users have always, at least implicitly, paid a premium for better design, UI, usability, and sometimes performance. That agreement remains in place for the iPhone. Another historic fact, early adopters receive, and pay for, the social and technical benefits of having the latest and greatest.
The article indicates that AT&T, based on sound research, expect iPhone users to hammer it's network. Granted, it'd be nice to have it in place at roll-out, but if AT&T uses these weeks to improve data through-put to iPhones... Yeah, it IS a big if.
And if iPhones consume 90% of the additional capacity, shouldn't iPhone owners pay for it? Let's say, AT&T has a 1 TB pipe between Palo Alto and Oakland; then adds a 500 MB pipe which, 90 days after rolling out tether/MMS, carries 450MB 12 hours a day. iPhone users don?t pay for the added 500MB?
Lastly, Thank God we live in a mostly free-market economy. In the article and discussion you, the users (the people!), came up with a dozen alternatives to what iPhone/AT&T offer.
Government fines and regulations add costs, costs we don't always see. A&T/Apple paying a fine and AT&T/Apple providing tether/MMS free-of-charge have at least one thing in common; both mean they pay for something which has no revenue to support it.
Messaging is part of everday life now - GLOBALLY - especially with "the younger generation" and things like Twitter. When you take that into consideration, the fact that ATT has an absurdly pathetic *100* international message per month plan yet in their announcement yesterday Apple said MMS in 29 countries, obviously wireless carriers either have to get a clue & step up to the plate, customers (especially corporate ones) have to wake up and demand that carriers have more substantial plans, or consumers will continue to get ripped of by quasi-extortionate fees when SMS itself costs fractions of pennies to send.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/06/09/t_mobile_hack_latest/
I think T-Mobile will be doing some fast-talking and their customers might gear up for a very fat suit against them.
I.e. Many of our Cell Tower are backed up by copper wire lines and not cheap VOIP. (this excludes Cricket)
Ever since ATT launched the I phone 3G it's 3G network has sort of sucked! I agree ATT needs to figure out a way to improve it. I also think Apple needs to put pressure on ATT to improve their network or break their exclusivity contract with ATT. The reason the blackberry bold was delayed was because ATT was unable to handle the 3G data demands due to the I phone 3G.
I think somewhere down the line Apple got toooooo greedy with the I phone. I mean they want the I phone to be affordable for everyone thus increasing their profit margins. But they know that ATT cannot handle the data demands of having so many i phones out there. I am sick of Apple going on and on about how they are soooo customer focused. But if they truly care about their customers they would not allow for such a poor network experience.
I think ATT should be very careful before implementing data tethering, we sure as he** don't want a slow network to get even slower.
Oh by the way for all those Verizon fans, Apple first approached Verizon about the I phone launch, guess what Verizon said 'No thanks' I betcthey regret that decision!
- by lovembbw June 11, 2009 7:18 AM PDT
- "Siegel couldn't say whether MMS and data tethering will be available on older versions of the iPhone. But if Apple is offering the features as part of the software upgrade, and AT&T offers the service for the iPhone 3G S phones, it would make sense for the company to offer the features on all iPhones supporting the upgraded software. But Siegel couldn't say for sure if this was the case."
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 4 pages (95 Comments)Hmmm. Asking ATT to do something that makes sense, huh? Want the sun to be purple too, do ya?