Comments on: Apple refreshes iPhones, MacBooks, and OS X at WWDC
It unveils a faster version of the iPhone, as well as faster notebooks. It also showed off the upcoming Snow Leopard software, iPhone OS 3.0, and more.
It unveils a faster version of the iPhone, as well as faster notebooks. It also showed off the upcoming Snow Leopard software, iPhone OS 3.0, and more.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Yeah, the increased processor speed is great, but it's not nearly as awesome as the first iPhone. And then the addition of 3G and GPS. This was really disappointing to me. I wanted more.
OLED screen would have been a good start. Definitely a bump in resolution. VGA at least. It's recording in VGA, why shouldn't I view in VGA? And with the new processor and RAM, why not offer background processing. Yeah it might kill battery but at least give me the option to use it. Even a new look would have been awesome. Something to separate the generations.
But no, I get slightly improved battery, a compass, video, and better performance. The only REAL feature there is video.
1. Video and in phone editing
2. Camera and 2 ways of focussing
3. Spotlight
4. Copy and Paste
5. Compass
I'm impressed but not that much compared to when the first two came out. Didnt reali care for a design change either. The current design is quite good.
iPhone OS 3.0 is way more exciting than the hardware of the iPhone 3GS
9 hrs of web use is a huge improvement IMO
plus video editing and camera shots were impressive too
I wonder if they improved the lens !
OLED would have been a good way to go , but ah well
it's not bad actually , at least for new customers !
For a "major iPhone update" it just seems to me like they're playing catch up with the G1. Honestly, it seems like video capturing, voice dialing and copy/paste are the "major" improvements with the new OS, and those are features already available on the G1 (admittedly, video capturing was just added last week with the Cupcake update). So what separates the iPhone from the G1? My answer is...the iPhone lacks the physical keyboard, and the G1 supports tethering through 3rd party apps. (note: the new iPhone supports tethering, but AT&T reportedly does not.)
"So what separates the iPhone from the G1? My answer is...the iPhone lacks the physical keyboard"
Your not serious are you... you wouldn't really want to go back to using a physical keyboard would you... You might as well request an intena that pulls out of the top for better reception... I thought we were trying to go forward with technology not backwards... if the iPhone hadn't ever come out you wouldn't have the G1 or anything else like it... in case people have forgotten where the mobil phone use to be... we would still be there if it wasn't for the iPhone... people have such short term memory... its only been three years... what more do you want from them... they've done so much in such a short amount of time... they're not even a cell phone company...
The main difference I've experienced is in usability. Right off the bat, I find the on-screen keyboard in portrait view completely unusable at this point. It's too inaccurate and I can only type probably no more than 10 wpm on it. (for comparison I can type closer to 30 wpm on my phone's physical keyboard). The landscape view is much more usable, but I can't touch type accurately on it. I suppose that might come with practice, but I can actually touch type on the physical keyboard without much difficulty, so how is the new technology better? Cause as of right now it just seems inconvenient to me.
"I find the on-screen keyboard in portrait view completely unusable at this point. It's too inaccurate and I can only type probably no more than 10 wpm on it. (for comparison I can type closer to 30 wpm on my phone's physical keyboard)." "Just because something is a little more technologically advanced does not mean it's better."
I assume that you are referring to your own experience with the G1... and not the iPhone... in which case I completely trust your judgment being that you are a G1 user and I am not.... I am sure that in the G1's case it most definitely needs a back up plan for a poor quality touch screen and/or software... hence a physical keyboard. I completely agree with you that just because something is more technologically advanced it does not mean it's better, Quality is key... How long did they work on research and development before they released it? could that possibly be the reasons for poor quality... Like you said "Just because something is a little more technologically advanced does not mean it's better." Features, features, features...look at all the features the G1 has that the iPhone doesn't... but does it work properly?
As an iPhone user I can honestly say that I don't have any of the problems you are having with your G1... it works great and isn't that the point.
In Apple's case they spent 5 years in research and development before the first iPhone was released... and on top of that they used there own OS they had been developing for years priar... Who's catching up with who?
Apple REMOVED the expresscard/34 slot and then replaced it with an SD slot? Wow, way to go Apple, you saved $3 on each machine to make it far less upgradable.
That's stupid. Now you can't add eSata or other nexgen devices and the machine becomes even LESS useful to professionals, like people that need to do video editing on the go. Now you have to go out and buy a $2700 17" Macbook Pro to do stuff like connect hi-speed external drives, SAS drives, RAID, specialty audio cards, additional USB ports or if you blow one of the ports on your machine you can get the functionality back by buying a FW800 expresscard for example.
FW800 is much slower than eSATA.
And you can do this all on a cheap $450 PC laptop. Wow.
And now the iPhone has features that old as hell Windows Mobile phones had, like Copy and Paste and Data Tethering (which doesn't work with AT&T).
yawn
As for eSATA, it's not a common standard. FireWire is more common. "blow one of the ports"? What are you, a drag racing mechanic? If you need some speed for data transfer, get a drive with 1000Mb Ethernet. You could network it and have high speeds, albeit not as fast as eSATA's advertised bandwidth.
Whine and moan, whine and moan.
Mobile musicians/recording engineers are going to be up in arms over this, as it means they will soon only have one mobile Mac option for using recording interfaces like the UAD-2 and for some Pro Tools users. And that one option will be the most expensive one.
I don't miss the expresscard or PCMCIA either. I've never needed them. But I can see why some would panic. Just in case they need it, it's gone.
I'll gladly buy an Apple laptop if the price is right. I have a Mac Mini and a Mac Pro (8 core). But I also have a PC desktop and a HP laptop.
Insane!
And now I know you spent engineering money to knobble your product and frustrate me.
I wanna punch the idiot that championed that idea... he/she should be sacked and a public apology issued because apple, I feel like you just punched me in the face.
Personally, I'm happy about the changes. iPhone OS 3.0 is a big bump, adding more features and abilities, plus opens the door for more apps. Free update for me!
OS X lots of nice new features plus a more optimized code set so my machines are more efficient now. No more requirement for QT Pro. Exchange support. All for $29. Thanks Apple.
Although I have a 24" iMac and a couple MacBooks, all looks good to me.
And the more I think about it...the more sense it makes.
People shouldn't have to re-install an OS simply because the previous one was buggy.
Much less pay a lot of money to do so.
(And yes, I'm sure Snow Leopard has more than just bug fixes, but that's the main emphasis this time around)
Apple keeps winning me over with their smart moves...it's keeping me a happy customer.
Yes because if you don't upgrade within 1 week from when Snow Leopard is released then your current version of Leopard will no longer run and your Mac will be bricked. Pretty good way to FORCE users to upgrade to a service pack.
Are you REALLY a Chief Technical Officer or does the CTO in your handle stand for something else?
The platform updates were nice, I suppose. I couldn't help but chafe at all of the updates to the 13" Macbook since I'm typing on 2-month-old version of that machine that's now significantly diminished in comparison to the new model, but I guess it had been long enough to avoid an SD card slot, which while it won't please pros much, was I believe a wanted and useful option for legions of casual users and was departure from other competitor's laptops.
Snow Leopard = yawn, which surprised me given the forum here. I thought they should have spent more time on snow leopard, given the impending release of Windows 7, but I'm not sure there was much more to talk about, which is kind of sad.
Perhaps they're saving some stuff behind the curtain for an event with Steve Jobs in the near future. One can only hope...
I know I won't be the only one to point this out, but.....it was built-in to the *OS* several years ago....and can be harnessed when using a graphics tablet. A better statement would have been "handwriting recognition is now built-in to the multi-touch trackpad."
- "The halo effect seems to be true. Apple says that OS X users have tripled since the release of the iPhone."
The 'halo' effect is usually described to imply the number of Windows-using iPod/iPhone users coming over to buy Mac hardware. The "OS X" users number is simply expressing how the majority of "OS X" users are iPhone/iPod users - it doesn't neccessarily mean more people are buying Macs.
BRING BACK EXPRESSCARD! Or add eSATA!
I know, it sucks that you have limited choices, but hey, you can always go for the refurb store. With the recent changes in price, in sure you can get an older pro with an expresscard slot for about $1500.
The professional segment relies on this connectivity.
!7" is too big on set.... Apple should put express slot on the 13" with a firewire to enable it to capture media in the field.
The macbook pro's are NOT pro... that word meant something once.
They used to be good apple did....
I submit not..
I agree the iphone is a nice phone.. But why so much hype of it?
I submit not.."
You "submit" wrong, Cylon. Were you even paying attention to this whole event? YES, the iPhone can MMS once it hits stores.
or a buy a unlocked version too !
this is ridiculous ! why does Apple like At&t again ?
people have screamed about this for years and finally gave up
when they realized that not many people cared about it
but with the express card slot you can add a lot more functionality like a data card etc.
I'll take a expresscard slot over a SD slot anyday or even firewire !
even though I can make do with the USB alternatives
the convenience of a Expresscard slot is a huge !
C'mon Apple even 400$ Pc notebooks have this feature !
even though they brough down the price of the macbook pro to 1699$
this is ridiculous !
I might be forced into a hakintosh for my future laptops !
/rant
That's why.
- by nuclio June 9, 2009 10:00 AM PDT
- Wow!!! what a disappointment about the Macbook "Pro" 15"... seems more like the Mac Book Semi-Pro, or the Mac Book Wanna Be Pro. To pay that much $ for a laptop and to not get an ExpressCard port is ridiculous. SD Card Slot you have got to be kidding!!! What the hell is a pro supposed to use that for? Almost every device that has a SD card for memory can direct inject AND charge via USB or FW? Granted pros, especially those in audio/video/media have peculiar needs that might not make sense to office types or consumers but isn't that the target for these machines? I thought the corporate machine was the AIR... no drive yet another brilliant move...and the consumer version was the MacBook. I'm worried about Apple with Steve Jobs out of the office.The bean counters are running amok making decisions based on just numbers. Artists and Media pros supported Apple through the $hit years, and created their aura of cool and this is how we get treated. One overpriced, under featured computer... at least they put FW back on the 13"... Hope the bean counter that made that great decision got fired. Man I'm done with Apple HW. My pre-Unibody 15" will be the last HW I buy from Apple.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by bernzeppi June 13, 2009 12:38 AM PDT
- Totally agree!
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (64 Comments)This is a stupid move of the order of removing firewire... or remember Apple Lisa!?
... a new bunch of idiots have taken over apple and aren't they arrogant?
This would have to be the ********* move made by this company for years.
We are now on notice as to the new policy from apple.
When noises were made about charging for Mpeg4 players, BBC invented Dirac and open sourced it so professionals wouldn't get trapped....
Apple has become one of those companies who want to trap us... time to shift... AVID, other editing brands and alternate hardware providers now look attractive to me!
sad... I was a big apple fan