Comments on: Apple tops PC customer satisfaction survey
Apple is the only company to receive a "good" rating in a Forrester Research customer satisfaction survey, followed by Gateway, HP, Compaq, and Dell.
Apple is the only company to receive a "good" rating in a Forrester Research customer satisfaction survey, followed by Gateway, HP, Compaq, and Dell.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Tell it to a PC OEM like Dell, HP, Toshiba or someone who actually makes the products.
You are correct, but according to Microsoft's latest round of commercials, they certainly give the impression that they are.
"Lauren" certainly wouldn't know the difference.
""Lauren" certainly wouldn't know the difference."
Ah, I take it you know Lauren personally then to be able to vouchsafe that fact that the person doesn't know the difference between a computer and the operating system? Or are you just making things up about a person you don't know or have met?
It takes a lot of gall to make such comments about someone you've never met or know. I'm certainly glad you know Lauren personally enough to make such comments about her. I'm sure she would really appreciate it.
Intentional/feigned ignorance doesn't suit you.
I don't have to know the actress personally, but I do know the archetype, as should you. Most typical/casual users (which "Lauren" portrays, hence the scare quotes) do not make the distinction between a computer and an operating system. To that person, both are one and the same. Microsoft made a further error by conflating the two (OS and hardware) in its latest round of commercials.
I had My old Powerbook G4 8 years.
yeah I loved those Powerbooks too
that was the time Apple made absolute perfect hardware
Now they have been tainted a bit by all the X86 crap from Intel and Co.
Also the Powerbooks were made in Japan if memory serves me correctly
the Macbook Pros OTOH are made just like everything else in those crappy Chinese sweat shops. I hope they move production back to Japan !
but still Apple is far ahead of companies like Dell etc
Wow. *head shakes sadly*
Well duh! :)
No, I think he is pretty even guy, no one side or the other.
As for the results, I have some questions/observations...
1. You don't find microsoft in the results since they do not make the hardware. Which brings up a delima. When you buy a PC where the hardware is from one company and the operating system is from another company, won't this automatically make support more difficut? That's common sense to me. More difficult? Yes. Impossible? No (I have never failed to have a hardware support call resolved successfully). It comes down to the value you place on it and whether you actually use it. Am I willing to spend $$$ on support that will have a repair tech show up onsite in 4 hours for a home computer? No, but I will for the company servers. The one year free support is more than adequate for my home computers (I have enough experience to repair my own, even the laptops). For me, I place little value on support for the computers I own since I have personally never needed it, and I place a much higher value on it for my company's servers which must run 24 X 7. It's your decision to decide how important support is for you.
2. This survey is for when your computer breaks and call support, it doesn't provide any reliability data on the computers themselves (i.e. how often will it break). A link to some data on reliability would have been nice. Actually an entire article on that would be very nice. Tom? Ina? Any CNet reporter willing to do it? I have asked for this information before and can find almost nothing on it by searching the internet. The only reliability survey I've seen was one found by VegamanDan.
2. Microsoft does provide consumer support for thier software. But they're listed in this survey because they don't make the hardware. Is there a survey to covers rating software companies on consumer support? And if so, would apple be included in that since they have proclaimed themselves a hardware company? This survey only shows the hardware support. If I want to compare the computer makers (dell, apple, gateway, HP), great. I can't make any judgements on microsoft support because they weren't listed. Do you have any software consumer rating surveys?
3. I would also be interested in what percentage of those who participated in the survey were from business or strictly from a home (the home/business ratio varies greatly between brands). Dell and HP are often found in business compared to the other brands. Did the home/business ratio vary greatly between brands in the survey as well? If 80% of the survey respondeds for Dell/HP were business customers and 5% of the survey respondeds for Gateway were business customers... would it be fair? With the vast differences in home/business ratios betwen brands, I can see this as a likely scenario. Too bad that information was not disclosed in the article.
4. I went, I looked, I'm not forking out $749 for a 6 page report. Yikes!
What was that again?
"@Vegaman_Dan: You're using a "hackintosh", which is not supported by Apple (and against their end-user agreement)."
And that doesn't change the fact at all that the OS had to reboot for a security update patch. Good attempt to try to change the subject, but I'm afraid it didn't quite work. :)
It also doesn't change the fact that you are doing something illegal and that you are too cheap to buy the real thing.
Do you all remember this Apple lemmings ad?
http://pulsar.esm.psu.edu/Faculty/Gray/graphics/movies/Apple-Lemmings.mov
It is, of course, a QuickTime video :)
Really, I'd not follow "Mr Jobs" off a cliff, hey I've even got a "non-Mac" (it's not Windows either, but that's not the point). Am I happy with my Mac? Yeah, it's great. Is it right for everyone - no, if you're a gamer then it's a bit pointless (here I mean that games are the reason you bought a machine). If you must run Windows all or almost all the time, well a Mac is a bit pointless. Otherwise, it might well be the right choice. Or a Linux box, whatever. But really saying I'm stupid for using a Mac - that's just retarded.
this and put Microsoft on top!
"An overall satisfaction rating of 80 percent was good enough for Apple to trounce the second-place finisher, Gateway, which scored 66 percent"
That means that people are not satisfied with their computers.
@Dragonsky: I believe he's talking about MPC, who bought Gateway's Business sect. MPC is bankrupt, and their support is crappy. I work at a school that employs "Gateways".
Macs and PC's are both good platforms. FACT. Windows machines do have more problems for one very simple reason. They do a hell of a lot more than Macs. They run far more software and allow far more freedom in terms of hardware.
Anyone who condemns one platform or another is an idiot. Its as simple as that.
Thats stupidest comment!
Got that right.
Known fact: Most people that troll message boards are idiots.
Known fact #2: Most people that troll message boards love to argue about mac vs. pc.
Linux Rules! ;-)
I've used both platforms since '91 and currently use the following regularly:
Macbook 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
Sony Vaio 2.0 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
oh really?
Seriously - I don't get it.
I also find it amazing how Microsoft succeed in equating PC with "Windows". Given how many people run Linux (and other things) on their "PC" it is quite a feat.
Windows Vista isn't built on top of MS-DOS. The last version of Windows that had MS-DOS embedded was "Windows ME". Vista is part of the "NT" line. I know Microsoft have a command line that looks like MS-DOS, but it really isn't.
Microsoft engineering problems are not caused by having MS-DOS in the mix. Actually Apple's OS engineering came from a different source that they bought in (NeXT Software Inc.) as they'd been boxed into a corner with Mac OS 9 (which I suppose was like Apple's "MS-DOS"). Mac OS X is a totally different animal (I'll resist a cat pun here) to Mac OS 9. I prefer Mac OS X to Windows - though I've not spent that much "quality time" with Vista.
totally agreed.
Plus if you have someone buys a $3000 computer, he will sound like a frigtard (sorry FSJ) if he do not tell surveyor that he is "satisfied"
You don't need to reload a OS for anything..
You are unqualified to comment on the Macintosh because you have no experience with one.
(Doesn't anyone remember when XP came out? People HATED IT!)
the majority of those owners are Windows users... not Mac Users. So it's not about Macs vs PC.. or Vista vs. Os X
DamN!! You guys never get tired of this petty arguing crap!!!!
[bet someone here may argue with me on this] LOL
jk jk
$600 hunk of junk under my desk right now can run Mac OS X if I want it to
its called Hackintosh
"parts used in a Mac are of the highest quality"
I object! Apple uses normal Intel processors with an ATi or nVidia graphics chip which was made by TMSC. They use WD HDD's and samsung RAM
not low quality, but not high quality either
I would rather have a Corolla than a Mercedes because Toyota is more reliable and cheaper, that's why I (mainly) use Windows/Ubuntu dual boot
I had to wait until I stopped laughing to post this. I have a 15 year old Quadra 800 Mac that is still running. I have a 17 year old Mac Classic that is still running. When someone shows me another brand of computer that can go that long without failure I will buy the argument that Macs are just overpriced baubles. What an idiotic statement to make without knowing what you are talking about.
All those "dissatisfied" PC owners are no more likely to switch to Mac's after reading the article, many will just switch to a different PC vendor then jump to an entirely different OS platform.
so a company has less than 10% market share!
Its products are more expensive!
Its the only company that sells its products, only 1 company!
What does than sum??
The only people who end up buying apple are the people who are "convinced" that PCs suck - which is such a "small number" of people THEREFORE
It will be SAD if apple didn't have @ least a 75%+ customer satisfaction!
The people who are not satisfied with PCs are only the ones that are considering giving up their PCs but have yet to - or may never will!!!
Bottom line ... there results don't really say much besides that the SMALL PERCENTAGE of people that switched to apple are satisfied! AND
a LARGE PERCENTAGE of people are just fine with their PCs
Ya, wanna correct my math - if you know how!
By the way, the "LARGE PERCENTAGE" of people you're talking about, do you have any evidence that they like their PC? I'd be willing to bet that being "fine" with their PC really just means that they don't or at least don't think that they have any choice in the matter. They have to be fine with what they have because it's all they have. It's also one of the main reasons XP is still around. It's the only choice those users have.
Having 80% satisfaction is, for any company, a major achievement. Having higher percentages would simply mean one of two things; your customers have started lowering their standards to the point that the same old thing looks better than it used to or you're actually getting better.
and if you read the article 65% Gateway users were satisfied... the bottom line is that any person with some basic mathematical plus logic understanding - guess some still don't have it - would be able to see that
A company that holds LESS THAN 10% of the marked, which is SOLELY composed of individual who are there PRIMARILY because they dislike the other company ===
DUH they better be satisfied.
no to mention the like of Asus Toshiba sony who all have lower marketsahre than Apple !
So stop with the marketsahre non-sense !
Apple has been leading is customer satisfaction for over 6 years
So other companies could do the same too create their Own O.S
you MS bias is showing !
you are criticizing a maker of MacBooks
the MacBook is just an ASUS notebook with Mac OS on it and branded under the brand of Apple so any praise of the MacBook should go to ASUS as well as Apple
maybe not even any credit to Apple since ASUS is an ODM as opposed to a CM and prolly designed AND manufactured the MacBook for Apple
and ASUS scores higher on reliability than Apple
ASUS FTW
only re-enforces the point that Macs are more efficient at any task
and also macs are replaced a lot less than Pcs whic could account for the lower market-share but they are a lot more in use
you ever longing task of prove that Macs and Pcs are just as reliable
has yet again been proven wrong by this fact !
@pithenumber
I wasnt crtitsizing Asus I like asus too they are a great company
good for them that they scored that high on the reliability survey
But the company that gave out the survey was prooved to be wrong
Do a google search you'll see
your overstating the importance of the survey of 1 single company
Apple has consistently scored higher than others for years
in multiple surveys in both reliability and customer satisfaction !
Asus can never match Apple they may be better than Dell Hp maybe
but no where close to Apple infact no one can is in this regard even thinkpads
I'll give asus one thing though they use damn Fine LCD panels in their laptops
better than even Apple !
Considering that the business has changed dramatically in the last year, I find this survey to be irrelevant.
I have a {brand x} laptop and this went wrong and they {did something} and {fixed/didn't fix} the problem. This kind of experience really tells me a lot about "Brand X" as a company, and as long as their failure rate is no worse than anyone else's then it would be a useful when making a purchasing decision.
Now here's what I know about Acer, if you have an Acer product that's DOA (hey it happens to everyone - shipping isn't good for electronics goods) they'll replace it - but it might be replaced with a system that had failed, which they repaired. Now I can see where they're coming from, but I'd not be happy with that. I paid for "new" I got "not new", personally I think that makes a difference (Acer is the only OEM I know that does this - this isn't a "Mac v PC" thing).
We buy a lot of Macs, and yeah, sometimes things go wrong. Thus far, Apple have always fixed the problems in a timely manor, with good grace. So I'm not surprised Apple do well. After the amazing run around I have with HP a couple of months ago - I'm not surprised they were beaten. But I'm sure lots of people by HP and never have a problem (I see a lot of dead HP laptops, but that could be down to how popular they are - I dunno).
- by free_fight49 April 17, 2009 2:30 PM PDT
- I'm currently using windows 7 beta, it's much better than vista and so far so good. that said i'm an entertainer and it seems to me that all the pros have macs.at the last workshop i went to i only saw macs no pcs at all. does that say anything about them?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by Inconnux April 17, 2009 10:09 PM PDT
- its amazing what another service pack to Vista will do... hope Vista 6.1 (win7) works for you...
- Like this
-
- by pithenumber April 19, 2009 2:03 PM PDT
- @lnconnux
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (104 Comments)7 is more than a service pack, but maybe less than a new OS
7 is Vista streamlined and a GUI change with excellent driver support even in its Beta stage and good compatibility
did I mention its FAST