Comments on: Apple sued over 'exploding' iPod Touch
A 15-year-old boy's iPod Touch allegedly exploded in his pocket at school, causing second-degree burns and a lawsuit filed against Apple.
A 15-year-old boy's iPod Touch allegedly exploded in his pocket at school, causing second-degree burns and a lawsuit filed against Apple.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.
Add this feed to your online news reader
I'm not sure if I should be scared, hoping it doesn't happen to me, or be glad that if it does happen, I may be all the richer for it. :)
You forgot your drum and cymbal...
How did you know that I play drums? Do I know you from somewhere?
Oh, and spandex underpants?!
And of course you size the asking amount appropriately so the settlement arrives in the range you're realistically expecting. No one sues for 25 grand and expects to settle for 23 grand.
Oh, and 225K is a little..... expensive for a burn injury, even a bad burn injury. Heck, I worked in a hospital for a short period once, and a person with a full body burn only got charged 40,000 dollars! There is NO way that a small burn on a guys leg, unless it had went down to the bone, would be charged that much.
The parents are trying to profit off this, I agree.
Did you work in healthcare in Colombia or something?? Where the cost of care is probably MUCH cheaper than it is here...
Hell, I was admitted for a High BP condition for 3 days and the bill was 27,000... Either you are full of... well you know what, or you are just trying to sound like you know more than you do..
Unless this kid was wearing gold laced diamond pants the $225,000 is way out of the ballpark for damage done but I am actually surprised the figure is even this low. I have grown so accustom to the pathetic lawsuits from people trying to make money and the numbers in the millions a number this number seems low.
McDonalds lady spills coffee on herself and makes out with millions. This guy is actually a victim of an accident and if asking for fractions of that stupid *****.
But c'mon, if you weren't an apple fanboy and your apple product blew up then who wouldn't sue apple that much, he was giving out $300 pieces of apple kit for free to rich kids for goodness sake.
I'm curious as to whether this may be a more serious problem. I have noticed that my 32GB 2G Touch does get bloody warm when I use it over extended periods of time. However, I don't do spandex...
Now if they get the 200k + then he will be the coolest guy on school for sure.
I think there's a _statue_ of limitations on putative damages.
Perhaps you mean puNative damages? Where there is not statute?
Clearly you don't know what a class action suit it.
You're back in high school in the middle of class...it's the first class after lunch so you're debating whether or not it's nap time.
All of a sudden, a LOUD pop...and the kid a couple rows up from you fly's out of his desk half running/hopping (cursing about fire or something) out of the classroom and into the hall...his crony follows, half blinded by the smoke trail that lingers.
That's funny.
You are probably right. If I have my iPhone in a pants pocket it is a front one because that can accommodate it. A back pocket could put a lot of pressure on the device.
Think about it. It "exploded" and "caught fire" in his pants -- in the classroom, while he was seated, while it was off. Then he had to get up, get out the attention of a friend to come with him, get to a restroom, then (with the help of a friend) get his pants off --- all the while it was in flames and melting his spandex underwear. This HAD to take several seconds -- maybe 10 seconds or more.
The doctor claimed there was only second degree burns -- nothing worse than blistering. Melted spandex is hot enough to cause third degree burns and sticks to the skin. It is NOT easy to get off. Additionally, it was melting onto his skin for many seconds. Only a bit of blistering is NOT consistent with the needed heat and time of the claimed incident.
Something smells here and it's not this kid's spandex underwear!
Either way, the battery in a phone should not explode nor catch fire.
Now I'm not going to say whether or not the kid did that...but it seems like a natural reaction to get the thing away from you, and run to get whatever it touched off you, and cleaned up. And if you have a friend near, they might just follow you cause Yelling I'm on fire as you run and throw a phone that's on fire across the room, gets attention pretty fast.
I'm guessing either the battery installed was faulty (do the iPod batteries come from Sony?) or like Perry_Clease said above, the iPod was mistreated (accidental bending, exposure to extreme temperatures...) in some way and the battery was damaged.
And if the batter was faulty...you should be suing the maker of the battery, not Apple.
I would have hoped Krazit would have been a bit more analytical about this than assuming an iPod touch actually did "explode".
fact of life
stick two 9volts together and see, it isn't a spectacular fireball or anything, but it explodes
laptop recalls: why? because there's a chance that the battery might explode
are we on to something?
It is not that it exploded that is unreasonable, it is the circumstances that just don't make any sense. Lithium ion fires range from 100- 300 degrees celsius. Spandex melts at 250 degrees celsius... The metal, and the glass that make up the chassis of the ipod touch have much higher melting points and are attached tightly through its design. For it too have "exploded" It would have needed quite a lot of cubic pressure. So much that it probably would have shot through his pants and caused injury to his leg... Spandex when melted is a sticky substance... at +250 celsius the kid would have gotten much severer burns than second degree. A second degree burn ranges from a bad sunburn to a cyst caused by caused by touching a hot stove. This guy is clearly a liar because if he was experiencing that kind of heat he would have been screaming his head out and would not make it to the bathroom. Imagine this.
<
OMG, my ipod exploded in my pocket.
You, my friend come help me get it out of my pocket in the bathroom.
*heads to bathroom
I need help getting my spandex underwear off.
> 2 minutes at least. His story makes no sense.
Actually they are, since they give you the same box back with a different cpu/gpu/mobo/ram/fan and heatsink/dvd drive.
Most normal people would think standby with the volume turned down to mute would be sufficient enough in school. Also note that the kid wasn't playing with the iPod either so it probably was in standby and not disturbing anybody...until it blew up.
I don't think Apple's lawyers are going to try and use that defense.
surely some details are missing.
Are these people trying to make a buck during hard times?
hmm...
- by ktwbc March 13, 2009 1:08 PM PDT
- I'd bet money that he had his Touch in his pocket with coins, and the edge of one of the coins went into the dock connector slot and created a short. And that's not the fault if Apple.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by firefoxluva95 March 13, 2009 1:23 PM PDT
- Why is it called "pocket change" if it shouldn't be carried in a pocket? Apple knows their device would be carried in pockets too and should have realized that other common objects such as coins may also hitch a ride next to each other.
- Like this
-
- by Lerianis3 March 13, 2009 2:12 PM PDT
- firefoxluva gets it right once again. Pocket change in a pocket with something like this should NOT cause the thing to short. Most of these things, including phones, have a thing where if the phone detects that the charging port is shorting out, they automatically shut off the charging ports flow of juice.
- Like this
-
- by SeizeCTRL March 15, 2009 3:59 PM PDT
- Yet every manufacturer seems to be doing recalls on laptops and exploding batteries... I don't think people carry their laptops around in their pocket, or start shoving coins into every crevice they can find in their notebook. Exploding batteries seem to be frightening common occurrence now.
- Like this
-
- by Sam Papelbon March 15, 2009 8:40 PM PDT
- haha
- Like this
-
- by coachgeorge March 16, 2009 8:32 PM PDT
- OMG,
- Like this
-
Showing 1 of 3 pages (138 Comments)Doubt anything in the connector slot would cause a short, otherwise plugging in the USB cable to one end (the iPod end) and not the other (the computer end) would probably also short out the iPod. Again, if the USB dock connector can cause explosions from shorting, it probably is faulty and may explode upon connection to a computer.
No, pocket change in a pocket would NOT do this, and because that is a NORMAL condition of someone's pocket, Apple would be negligent if they truly didn't take that into account!
'you're honor, the plaintiff had coins in his pocket at the time of the explosion, which caused a short'
'COINS?! in his POCKET? son what in b'jesus name you doin with coins in your pocket? tryin to burn the school down? case dismissed! not so fast, boy, i only dismissed YOUR case. i hereby sentence you to 25 years incarceration for negligent usage of pockets to hold coins. oh, and bailiff, search him for nickels before you lock him up'
Another early April Fools Joke. The second one tonight!
I have to assume you are kidding.
I say, Burn baby Burn. Not the kid, APPLE!