Version: 2008

Comments on: Apple sued over 'exploding' iPod Touch

A 15-year-old boy's iPod Touch allegedly exploded in his pocket at school, causing second-degree burns and a lawsuit filed against Apple.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 3 pages (138 Comments)
by karpenterskids March 13, 2009 11:34 AM PDT
haha
I'm not sure if I should be scared, hoping it doesn't happen to me, or be glad that if it does happen, I may be all the richer for it. :)
Reply to this comment
by ibeetle March 13, 2009 11:46 AM PDT
I still cannot get passed a 15 year old boy wearing spandex underwear.
by Brent212 March 13, 2009 1:15 PM PDT
Yeah, really. Spandex??? Is he a swimmer, or david lee roth?
by Stormspace March 13, 2009 1:19 PM PDT
Compression shorts are worn by some kids and it's material is similar to spandex. It helps kids who run track and prevents chaffing.
by Michichael March 13, 2009 2:06 PM PDT
Spandex and he had a friend's help getting his pants off? *snicker*
by irishlad1994 March 13, 2009 4:04 PM PDT
ya seriously wat kind of 15 yr old wears spandex---im a swimmer n i certainly dont
by Fil0403 March 14, 2009 5:50 AM PDT
@ everyone: Yes, definitely, I think it's the kids fault, I mean, how can anyone sue a company just because one of their products exploded in their pants while they were using spandex?
by codynews March 14, 2009 8:48 AM PDT
@brent2212: omg, your comment made me "LOL" for real. haha, i'm still laughing
by SeizeCTRL March 15, 2009 3:50 PM PDT
Makes me wonder if it's something like the Under Armor wear and not actual spandex... I mean come on, it's not 1986, no one really wears spandex anymore, but there's a lot of stuff similar, especially for sports, outdoors and winter.
by Seaspray0 March 15, 2009 10:30 PM PDT
You people sure are giving this kid a rough time for wearing spandex shorts. If he wins, your posts could help ensure a nice settlement for "pain and suffering".
by ilbknownas1 March 16, 2009 9:06 AM PDT
Tons of kids wear compression shorts that i know, including me, maybe thats what they consider spandex..
See more comment replies
by ballmerisanape March 13, 2009 11:48 AM PDT
It was all of that porn he had stored on it.
Reply to this comment
by karpenterskids March 13, 2009 8:00 PM PDT
Yeah, some of that stuff is quite explosive.
by wnbear March 16, 2009 5:51 AM PDT
@ karpenterskids

You forgot your drum and cymbal...
by karpenterskids March 18, 2009 10:02 AM PDT
lol...drum and cymbal?

How did you know that I play drums? Do I know you from somewhere?
by HaredX March 20, 2009 1:10 PM PDT
Are you serious? He was obviously referring to a rimshot lol. You know... drum and a symbol... *du dum tsssss" Being a drummer you should know what a rimshot is.....
by kcotham March 13, 2009 11:48 AM PDT
$225,000! Come on, the amount is ridiculous. Clearly, the parents are looking to profit off of an accident. I understand wanting a little punishment and of course any medical and legal fees, but give me a break.

Oh, and spandex underpants?!
Reply to this comment
by Astinsan March 13, 2009 11:56 AM PDT
They really should just settle it. 225k to you or me may seem like a lot. It would be better for both parties if they payed (after investigation of the failure)
by ejevo March 13, 2009 1:09 PM PDT
Anyone ever hear of "Under Armour"??? Geez Louise.

And of course you size the asking amount appropriately so the settlement arrives in the range you're realistically expecting. No one sues for 25 grand and expects to settle for 23 grand.
by jmpetersen March 13, 2009 1:30 PM PDT
Oh, the amount is ridiculous? Have You been to the hospital lately? I can easily envisioin that amount, and perhaps even more for a complete recovery. Then, if it's like this, a law suit, don't you think the attorney is going to demand his third (off the top) and then they start invoicing for everything you can imagine. Apple shoulda given them $400K to shut up and go away without the lawsuit.
by Lerianis3 March 13, 2009 2:07 PM PDT
I'd really like Apple to investigate this and find out if the kid had done anything to the Touch (accidentally or on purpose) that would have caused it to do this, so that they could warn users not to do what he did.
Oh, and 225K is a little..... expensive for a burn injury, even a bad burn injury. Heck, I worked in a hospital for a short period once, and a person with a full body burn only got charged 40,000 dollars! There is NO way that a small burn on a guys leg, unless it had went down to the bone, would be charged that much.
The parents are trying to profit off this, I agree.
by IceEmQuick March 13, 2009 2:34 PM PDT
Ok, to the person who said a person with full body burns with what I assume is the full care that would go into it, would be alot more than just 40G's... If you remember that Amaco plant explosion in the early 90's. My parents friend was the only survior, and he was 88% burned, and was in the hospital for 4 month's at a final cost of $450,000. Now he sue for that and damanges and pain and sufferering and won and got more than asked...

Did you work in healthcare in Colombia or something?? Where the cost of care is probably MUCH cheaper than it is here...

Hell, I was admitted for a High BP condition for 3 days and the bill was 27,000... Either you are full of... well you know what, or you are just trying to sound like you know more than you do..
by Jlmc727 March 13, 2009 4:04 PM PDT
To the person reguarding the Amaco plant explosion I remember that and the survior with the 88% burned was a third degree fire and chemical burn. major difference from second degree burns. I could see a 100% second dgree burn costing under 50k.
by tcr071 March 13, 2009 11:23 PM PDT
Yeah. This kid has a minor second degree burn on a small portion of his body. I doubt he was in the hospital over 72 hours. The medical bills for this won't cross $15,000 and even that is being awfully generous.

Unless this kid was wearing gold laced diamond pants the $225,000 is way out of the ballpark for damage done but I am actually surprised the figure is even this low. I have grown so accustom to the pathetic lawsuits from people trying to make money and the numbers in the millions a number this number seems low.

McDonalds lady spills coffee on herself and makes out with millions. This guy is actually a victim of an accident and if asking for fractions of that stupid *****.
by Notoapplefanbois March 14, 2009 1:42 AM PDT
Well it's actually 150k + whatever he has to pay their lawyer.

But c'mon, if you weren't an apple fanboy and your apple product blew up then who wouldn't sue apple that much, he was giving out $300 pieces of apple kit for free to rich kids for goodness sake.
by make_or_break March 14, 2009 2:38 PM PDT
Obviously some of the posters here don't have a CLUE at how expensive healthcare can be, nor do they recognize how expensive LAWYER FEES are as well. Frankly, Apple is getting off EASY if they're only penalized $225k. An exploding li-ion battery (gee, sounds awfully familiar, don't it?) isn't exactly unheard of...just ask Sony about their little problem with faulty battery production. If this Touch got a defective battery...or has something else wrong with his specific Touch...that wouldn't surprise me a bit. There's no such thing as a perfectly made product with each and every unit.

I'm curious as to whether this may be a more serious problem. I have noticed that my 32GB 2G Touch does get bloody warm when I use it over extended periods of time. However, I don't do spandex...
by romodoc March 15, 2009 11:26 AM PDT
you guys are missing something, what about psychological damage. Imagine you are a 15 yo boy and wake up wan day to school and you are the cool guy with the cool gadgets (a 300 buck mp3p) next day you are the boy who wear spandex underpants lol. plus your gadget exploded and you mommy is taking care of everything.
Now if they get the 200k + then he will be the coolest guy on school for sure.
See more comment replies
by punlman March 13, 2009 11:56 AM PDT
PUTATIVE damages in the millions of dollars, as a class action suit, would be more appropriate for this type of negligence.
Reply to this comment
by camp88 March 13, 2009 1:09 PM PDT
ROFL

I think there's a _statue_ of limitations on putative damages.

Perhaps you mean puNative damages? Where there is not statute?
by Dylan_Wisor March 13, 2009 1:35 PM PDT
Dumb.
by pentest March 14, 2009 10:48 AM PDT
A class action suit, for an event that affect one person?

Clearly you don't know what a class action suit it.
by stefanvolos March 13, 2009 11:58 AM PDT
Maybe it was this kid's nylon/spandex hotpants that caused the iPod to overheat?!
Reply to this comment
by ikramerica--2008 March 13, 2009 5:08 PM PDT
Well, not likely, but he may have had the unit ON in his pocket during class to hide it, which caused it to overheat. But it shouldn't explode.
by ikramerica--2008 March 13, 2009 5:09 PM PDT
The real question is if they also sued the maker of the underwear. It is very possible that if he were not wearing plastic underwear, it would not have burned/melted into his skin like that nor would it have been as hard to get off. Cotton does not behave in that fashion...
by codynews March 14, 2009 8:51 AM PDT
hahaha, stop. You guys are killing me today. That's the second comment that made me seriously augh out loud
by pentest March 14, 2009 10:49 AM PDT
The kid should have taken them off immediately. It is stop, drop and roll. Not run and make it worse.
by wnbear March 16, 2009 6:11 AM PDT
Just picture the whole thing...

You're back in high school in the middle of class...it's the first class after lunch so you're debating whether or not it's nap time.

All of a sudden, a LOUD pop...and the kid a couple rows up from you fly's out of his desk half running/hopping (cursing about fire or something) out of the classroom and into the hall...his crony follows, half blinded by the smoke trail that lingers.

That's funny.
by Perry_Clease March 13, 2009 12:03 PM PDT
I wonder what it would take to bend an iPod Touch and if that could be accomplished by sitting with the iPod in a pants pocket. What I am thinking is that a bend might have shorted the battery causing the explosion.
Reply to this comment
by firefoxluva95 March 13, 2009 1:26 PM PDT
It depends on what pocket. I infer that it might be the front pocket since it burned his leg and the article did not mention anything about his behind getting burned...just his leg. Interesting insight...but probably not a hypothesis I will try to test and validate. Submit idea to Mythbusters.
by Perry_Clease March 13, 2009 1:48 PM PDT
@ firefoxluva95

You are probably right. If I have my iPhone in a pants pocket it is a front one because that can accommodate it. A back pocket could put a lot of pressure on the device.
by tipoo_ March 13, 2009 12:08 PM PDT
Jobs: "Its a feature!"
Reply to this comment
by karpenterskids March 13, 2009 8:00 PM PDT
hahahaha...good one.
by Shaun822 March 15, 2009 11:52 AM PDT
Jobs: "We told you this was the hot product of this generation"
by tech_junky48 March 15, 2009 12:36 PM PDT
Jobs: "And the new iPod Touch even has a built-in leg warmer for those cold days!"
by SeizeCTRL March 15, 2009 3:55 PM PDT
I can see the new young hipper yuppy terrorists strapping 50-60 iPhones/Touches to their chest and boarding a plane hoping to bring it down in one mighty explosion.
by AL_Law March 13, 2009 12:14 PM PDT
"PUTATIVE" damages are alleged damages, i think you mean "punitive" damages (ie damages to punish) Anyway, 225k is way too high of course and they'll probably settle at about $50-75k
Reply to this comment
by Notoapplefanbois March 15, 2009 9:01 AM PDT
Fanboy
by sparrowhyperion March 13, 2009 12:19 PM PDT
Man... Talk about Baked Apples.... Anyways, I think part of the punitive damages are for psychological trauma. I mean now this kid has to go through school with everyone in the school knowing he wears spandex nylon underwear..... Just more proof that Hotpants are not yet out of style...
Reply to this comment
by johnqh March 13, 2009 2:29 PM PDT
+100. The poor kid may have to change school after this.
by shadowself March 13, 2009 12:22 PM PDT
This suit is totally asinine.

Think about it. It "exploded" and "caught fire" in his pants -- in the classroom, while he was seated, while it was off. Then he had to get up, get out the attention of a friend to come with him, get to a restroom, then (with the help of a friend) get his pants off --- all the while it was in flames and melting his spandex underwear. This HAD to take several seconds -- maybe 10 seconds or more.

The doctor claimed there was only second degree burns -- nothing worse than blistering. Melted spandex is hot enough to cause third degree burns and sticks to the skin. It is NOT easy to get off. Additionally, it was melting onto his skin for many seconds. Only a bit of blistering is NOT consistent with the needed heat and time of the claimed incident.

Something smells here and it's not this kid's spandex underwear!
Reply to this comment
by ckurowic March 13, 2009 3:49 PM PDT
You are totally correct. Something does not add up here, and melting spandex is a really big deal, ask a soldier that has had that stuff on him during an IED attack. You end up with material fuzed onto and into your flesh. Sorry but this kids a liar.
by viper396 March 16, 2009 12:01 PM PDT
You're just speculating and assuming he should have reacted the same way you think you would have in the same situation. Have you ever actually been on fire before? You do not have the full details of how the situation actually went down nor first hand experience. You're just a poser sitting on the sidelines pretend to be an expert.

Either way, the battery in a phone should not explode nor catch fire.
by Reaper0700 March 24, 2009 1:20 PM PDT
I have a friend who's old Razor exploded in his pocket while it was off. The first thing he did was take it out of his pocket, and throw it away from himself as he ran off to get baking soda on the battery acid which was threw his pants and now on his leg. a co-worker quickly followed him cause you tend to follow the guy you know who just took a flaming phone of of his pocket. In the end, Only got first degree burns because in reality he didn't get any battery acid on him, just in his pants pocket and got his pants off fast enough to be ok.

Now I'm not going to say whether or not the kid did that...but it seems like a natural reaction to get the thing away from you, and run to get whatever it touched off you, and cleaned up. And if you have a friend near, they might just follow you cause Yelling I'm on fire as you run and throw a phone that's on fire across the room, gets attention pretty fast.
by Norseman March 13, 2009 12:23 PM PDT
Liar, liar, pants................well, you know.
Reply to this comment
by DanielDaly March 13, 2009 12:49 PM PDT
+2 Internets to you good sir. I lol'd.
by ikramerica--2008 March 13, 2009 5:12 PM PDT
ROFL. Double ROFL. I almost peed my pants. Maybe this kid should have tried that. Or maybe that's what caused the fire?
by Apple_fan_95 March 13, 2009 12:24 PM PDT
Oh my gosh, all they need is some burn cream and a bandage. That much money is ridiculous, what are they going to hire a plastic surgeon to replace his leg? all they need is a five dollar tube of burn cream, and a new pair of spandex underwear. They just want to make some money. You have to hate when liberals sue over crap like this. If the plaintiff reads this post., get over it. The only thing you need from apple is a new ipod. My sister got third degree burns, she didnt even go to the doctor, and she was fine.
Reply to this comment
by firefoxluva95 March 13, 2009 1:40 PM PDT
So you make the assumption that everybody that receives third degree burns will be fine. It all depends on size of burn, time it took for the burning object to be removed, and severity of the burn (there are different severities to third degree burns). So look at the iPod touch...imagine flames bursting out of it and realize that it could have burned an area equivalent to more than half of his upper leg on one side. He might need some skin grafting there too; he might not. He may need antibiotics to prevent infection; he might not. If there is enough damage, he might need reconstructive surgery; he might not. It's best to know the full situation before jumping to conclusions like "all they need is some burn cream and a bandage" because some situations can be more severe than that of your sister
by Lerianis3 March 13, 2009 2:09 PM PDT
firefoxluva95 gets it right. There are differing severities to third degree burns, and some of them would require reconstructive surgery if they were extremely deep, and that can be expensive and some asinine insurance companies won't pay for that.
by ballmerisanape March 13, 2009 2:22 PM PDT
A 2nd degree burn is what you get with a bad sun burn. A focal 2nd degree burn requires clean gauze and maybe a little antibiotic. Not a big deal, really. Not that I would want one.. but it shouldn't even buy you a trip to an ER.
by random truth March 13, 2009 2:28 PM PDT
The problem is that its a second degree burn, not a third degree burn.
by redwall_hp March 13, 2009 12:25 PM PDT
$225,000? No way. I can see suing for compensation for the medical costs, but no "punitive" charges. Anomalies like this happen; it's not like the entire line is flawed or anything.

I'm guessing either the battery installed was faulty (do the iPod batteries come from Sony?) or like Perry_Clease said above, the iPod was mistreated (accidental bending, exposure to extreme temperatures...) in some way and the battery was damaged.

And if the batter was faulty...you should be suing the maker of the battery, not Apple.
Reply to this comment
by Lerianis3 March 13, 2009 2:10 PM PDT
That's faulty reasoning: we don't KNOW if the entire line of products is flawed or not yet. That will have to be proven by an investigation done into what is left (if anything) of the kid's Touch, and even then they might not be able to prove whether the thing was faulty or not.
by shadowself March 13, 2009 12:25 PM PDT
Also Krazit's believing that the iPod touch did indeed explode is unreasonable. We only have this kid's word for it (there are many, many other possible explanations that fit the doctor's report) -- that and his mother's and lawyer's.

I would have hoped Krazit would have been a bit more analytical about this than assuming an iPod touch actually did "explode".
Reply to this comment
by firefoxluva95 March 13, 2009 1:43 PM PDT
How is believing that an electronic device with a battery can explode unreasonable? It has a battery...so it always will have that possibility of explosion. It's not a great probability but it can't be ruled out 100%.
by pithenumber March 13, 2009 2:24 PM PDT
Batteries explode
fact of life
stick two 9volts together and see, it isn't a spectacular fireball or anything, but it explodes
laptop recalls: why? because there's a chance that the battery might explode
are we on to something?
by random truth March 16, 2009 12:20 AM PDT
@firefoxluva95
It is not that it exploded that is unreasonable, it is the circumstances that just don't make any sense. Lithium ion fires range from 100- 300 degrees celsius. Spandex melts at 250 degrees celsius... The metal, and the glass that make up the chassis of the ipod touch have much higher melting points and are attached tightly through its design. For it too have "exploded" It would have needed quite a lot of cubic pressure. So much that it probably would have shot through his pants and caused injury to his leg... Spandex when melted is a sticky substance... at +250 celsius the kid would have gotten much severer burns than second degree. A second degree burn ranges from a bad sunburn to a cyst caused by caused by touching a hot stove. This guy is clearly a liar because if he was experiencing that kind of heat he would have been screaming his head out and would not make it to the bathroom. Imagine this.
<
OMG, my ipod exploded in my pocket.
You, my friend come help me get it out of my pocket in the bathroom.
*heads to bathroom
I need help getting my spandex underwear off.
> 2 minutes at least. His story makes no sense.
by GajaKannan March 13, 2009 12:26 PM PDT
Apple products fail? That never happens. If it does, it would be called as microsoft and dell...
Reply to this comment
by celticbrewer March 13, 2009 12:43 PM PDT
Ya, and every XBox360 owner is on their first console. Get real! I know people who have gone through up to 4 ipods becuase they kept crapping out.
by firefoxluva95 March 13, 2009 1:41 PM PDT
I know...new revelation right. Apple products actually fail? The world is coming to an end...
by abundantsnotbob March 13, 2009 11:49 PM PDT
Apple products fail when the warranty is over. I think they design the battery to last 2 years and a week. I have heard that Xbox 360s die alot, but I think they all have 3 year warranties. I have only had mine for a few months and only used it about 15 times. So far I mostly play demos that don't use the disc drive.
by Notoapplefanbois March 15, 2009 9:07 AM PDT
@celticbrewer

Actually they are, since they give you the same box back with a different cpu/gpu/mobo/ram/fan and heatsink/dvd drive.
by Apple_fan_95 March 13, 2009 12:27 PM PDT
also, his ipod shouldn't have even been on during school.
Reply to this comment
by firefoxluva95 March 13, 2009 1:18 PM PDT
On or off the battery could still short out and explode, off just reduces the likelihood but doesn't eliminate it. After all, a battery doesn't have to be in use to explode when subject to extreme conditions.

Most normal people would think standby with the volume turned down to mute would be sufficient enough in school. Also note that the kid wasn't playing with the iPod either so it probably was in standby and not disturbing anybody...until it blew up.
by Dylan_Wisor March 13, 2009 1:38 PM PDT
What objectivity, Apple_fan_95.

I don't think Apple's lawyers are going to try and use that defense.
by Goodbye Helicopter March 13, 2009 12:38 PM PDT
did it or did it not happen like this?
surely some details are missing.
Are these people trying to make a buck during hard times?
hmm...
Reply to this comment
by ewsachse March 13, 2009 12:46 PM PDT
All you Apple fanbois are ready to dismiss the case and orally service Steve Jobs. Clowns.
Reply to this comment
by pentest March 14, 2009 10:54 AM PDT
And you are ready to believe it all and go fap thinking about it. Clown.
by efreak1 March 13, 2009 12:54 PM PDT
Stupid
Reply to this comment
by ktwbc March 13, 2009 1:08 PM PDT
I'd bet money that he had his Touch in his pocket with coins, and the edge of one of the coins went into the dock connector slot and created a short. And that's not the fault if Apple.
Reply to this comment
by firefoxluva95 March 13, 2009 1:23 PM PDT
Why is it called "pocket change" if it shouldn't be carried in a pocket? Apple knows their device would be carried in pockets too and should have realized that other common objects such as coins may also hitch a ride next to each other.

Doubt anything in the connector slot would cause a short, otherwise plugging in the USB cable to one end (the iPod end) and not the other (the computer end) would probably also short out the iPod. Again, if the USB dock connector can cause explosions from shorting, it probably is faulty and may explode upon connection to a computer.
by Lerianis3 March 13, 2009 2:12 PM PDT
firefoxluva gets it right once again. Pocket change in a pocket with something like this should NOT cause the thing to short. Most of these things, including phones, have a thing where if the phone detects that the charging port is shorting out, they automatically shut off the charging ports flow of juice.
No, pocket change in a pocket would NOT do this, and because that is a NORMAL condition of someone's pocket, Apple would be negligent if they truly didn't take that into account!
by SeizeCTRL March 15, 2009 3:59 PM PDT
Yet every manufacturer seems to be doing recalls on laptops and exploding batteries... I don't think people carry their laptops around in their pocket, or start shoving coins into every crevice they can find in their notebook. Exploding batteries seem to be frightening common occurrence now.
by Sam Papelbon March 15, 2009 8:40 PM PDT
haha

'you're honor, the plaintiff had coins in his pocket at the time of the explosion, which caused a short'

'COINS?! in his POCKET? son what in b'jesus name you doin with coins in your pocket? tryin to burn the school down? case dismissed! not so fast, boy, i only dismissed YOUR case. i hereby sentence you to 25 years incarceration for negligent usage of pockets to hold coins. oh, and bailiff, search him for nickels before you lock him up'
by coachgeorge March 16, 2009 8:32 PM PDT
OMG,
Another early April Fools Joke. The second one tonight!
I have to assume you are kidding.

I say, Burn baby Burn. Not the kid, APPLE!
Showing 1 of 3 pages (138 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement