Version: 2008

Comments on: iPhone developer frustrations melt away with NDA

It took Apple four paragraphs to rehabilitate its image among iPhone developers, paving the way for better iPhone software by letting developers share ideas.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (31 Comments)
by techman21 October 1, 2008 1:36 PM PDT
It's still ridiculous that Apple restricts applications that are too much like their "own plans" - what, afraid of a little friendly developer competition? What an uproar there would be if Microsoft restricted developers like that!!!
Reply to this comment
by ckurowic October 1, 2008 3:44 PM PDT
UM, microsoft does restrict them, ever read one of their agreements???? Are you insane or just living under a rock?
by caldjeff October 1, 2008 1:46 PM PDT
Wait...so if NDA still applies to unreleased software, how is this going to help those developers who could use some community assistance to build a new app? Do you really need to be able to discuss development as much once your app has been released? And are they going to also allow devs to know what criteria are being used to judge an app to be app store worthy?

Forgive me if I'm a bit underwhelmed by this "gesture" of "goodwill". I think it's more likely that somebody at Apple has been reading blogs of pissed of devs for the last few weeks and then they just looked at their calendar and realized that Oct 22 is only 3 weeks away, and on that glorious day, the Android beast is unleashed...no NDA required.
Reply to this comment
by Tom Krazit October 1, 2008 1:59 PM PDT
Those developers working on their unreleased apps will be able to ask developers who have gone before them how they tackled a certain problem in a released application. There are little tips and tricks that are applicable across different types of applications, developers often share these kinds of things on mailing lists and discussion forums. Developers who have a couple applications under their belt probably have other ones in mind for future developement.

Android may have indeed forced Apple's hand to a certain extent, but iPhone developers seem happy either way, which is all that really matters for Apple and iPhone users.
by jprescott October 1, 2008 8:53 PM PDT
By "unreleased software," it's APPLE unreleased software, like beta releases of future SDK versions, and other pre-release software. This happens with Mac OSX all the time, developers who so desire can get beta copies of Mac OSX and other system software prior to release to the general public, but, they cannot disclose details of the beta software until it is released to the general public.

Third-party software is outside of Apple's control, and is as open as the developer wants it to be. If a developer wants to consult with other developers and makes details of his app available, that is up to the that developer, and is only the business of Apple to the extent that details of Apple's software enters into the discussion.
by Perry_Clease October 1, 2008 2:04 PM PDT
Developer frustrations may be melting, but frustrations of non-developer critics is accreting.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto October 2, 2008 6:46 AM PDT
But of course... you expected differently?
by softwaredesignengineer October 1, 2008 2:25 PM PDT
Apple is idiotic when it comes to developers. Sheash, Microsoft is ten times wayyyy more developer friendly.
Reply to this comment
by ckurowic October 1, 2008 3:45 PM PDT
Of course you know what you are talking about, I mean, no doubt especially with that inconspicuous screen name of "softwaredesignengineer". Thats pretty lame buddy, like a vanity plate.
by setgo October 1, 2008 5:45 PM PDT
lol I agree ckurowic
by francis9731 October 1, 2008 3:16 PM PDT
The iPhone is without a doubt a hot topic among other mobile-software development companies, such as Microsoft, Symbian, Research In Motion, and Google. However, if those companies really wanted to figure out how the iPhone works, it's not much of a stretch to assume that they have ways of making that happen.Instead of throwing off the competition, the NDA merely angered developers who wanted nothing more than to help make Apple's latest baby even better: they just needed a little help from their friends.
Reply to this comment
by Seaspray0 October 1, 2008 3:37 PM PDT
"Apple's hallmark is control". I agree. It can cause more problems than the benefits.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease October 1, 2008 4:23 PM PDT
Got any examples?
by sachman1 October 1, 2008 4:45 PM PDT
Nothing like a dose of competition to stir things up

http://tinyurl.com/48z3h7
Reply to this comment
by Goodbye Helicopter October 1, 2008 5:42 PM PDT
WAAA, I have to agree to something, WAAA

At least this will stop the whiners and the dolts who don't read.
Reply to this comment
by Nodack October 1, 2008 7:06 PM PDT
Forgive Apple if they don't trust any developers. A guy named Bill Gates used to work for them and promised not to steal any ideas while he was there not long before he quit Apple to start Microsoft.
Reply to this comment
by SpiritWater October 1, 2008 9:11 PM PDT
Bill Gates never worked for Apple. Bill and Paul Allen started Microsoft in 1975 and Apple started in 1978.

Microsoft made software for the original Mac that was the precursor to Office. They used their experience developing for the Mac to make applications for what would be Windows.

Bill Gates once has Apple to clone the Mac but Apple refused hence Microsoft's focus on Windows.

Microsoft does have better developer support than Apple, but Apple is quickly catching up and their tools are getting better.
by Penguinisto October 2, 2008 6:47 AM PDT
Err, Microsoft was once an Apple contract vendor, so in essence, Gates did work for them at one point.
by DrtyDogg October 5, 2008 1:13 PM PDT
Err, my company has done contract work for MS, Dell, Honeywell, GE . . . does that mean I've worked in all of those places?
by sterlingcoo October 1, 2008 8:18 PM PDT
This is all par for the course for Apple, get used to it.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo October 1, 2008 8:56 PM PDT
Who cares / It`s still a closed system and Apple won`t let better apps than their own onto the system. This changes nothing ! Android still will kick Job`s ass and he knows it. Just as Amazon MP3/MyspaceMusic will make iToons irrelevant. Myspace is a completely now model Apple can`t compete with. A social site that lets users stream full-length , high-quality music from all the major labels...And it is well known RIAA is allowing Amazon to sell tracks/albums that are not avilable to Apple. iToons on it`s way out like the horse and buggy.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo October 1, 2008 8:59 PM PDT
Apple/Jobs=pay more , get DRM ! Only get select non-DRM tracks from EMI. We are onto you Jobs...you are an ass.
Reply to this comment
by Mark_Anderson October 2, 2008 4:40 AM PDT
So, aside from the fact the statement reads like it was composed by a whiny child, what does this actually give developers in terms of reassurance that their apps won't be booted because they contravene Apple's secret selection policies (i.e. it's better than their native app)?

Bugger all. That's what.

All sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Reply to this comment
by Super2online October 2, 2008 5:31 AM PDT
What"s this I'm hearing on the radio about Apple and the record lables in a tiff over price again. Jobs says he will close iTunes before giving in on price?
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease October 2, 2008 5:58 AM PDT
"by Super2online October 2, 2008 5:31 AM PDT
What"s this I'm hearing on the radio about Apple and the record lables in a tiff over price again. Jobs says he will close iTunes before giving in on price?"

The "radio" did not have it quite right, Steve Jobs did not say that. From the story on CNN:

"In a statement submitted to the board last year, iTunes vice president Eddy Cue said Apple might close its download store rather than raise its 99 cents a song price or absorb the higher royalty costs

...If the [iTunes music store] was forced to absorb any increase in the ... royalty rate, the result would be to significantly increase the likelihood of the store operating at a financial loss - which is no alternative at all," Cue wrote. "Apple has repeatedly made it clear that it is in this business to make money, and most likely would not continue to operate [the iTunes music store] if it were no longer possible to do so profitably..."
Reply to this comment
by inachu October 2, 2008 6:56 AM PDT
Would be nice to do as Balmer says but if this was the case then I could just copy the Iphone OS onto my pc and boot the iphone off my pc and make calls from my pc and such.

Now if we can do that and port the Iphone to Virtual pc or vmware that would be sweet!
Reply to this comment
by make_or_break October 2, 2008 7:29 AM PDT
One word...Google. I think Android and Google's blunt openness over its "open platform" nature for its own app development was the kick that finally pushed Apple over the edge.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo October 2, 2008 8:00 AM PDT
Apple stock is melting away...AAPL just dropped 8% more , right after Nokia launched it`s new "comes with music" phones , and new touch-screen phone.
Say it ain`t so ! Bwahahahaha !
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo October 2, 2008 12:55 PM PDT
AAPL dropped almost $9 today while MSFT actually was up a few cets. Here is one reason why...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7649060.stm
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo October 3, 2008 5:29 AM PDT
The only thing melting away is Apple`s Market Cap. AAPL lost over 40 B in just one week ! ouch !
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (31 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Apple

At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Apple topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here