Comments on: Tests clear iPhone 3G antenna as cause of reception problems
Swedish tech publication GP tests the iPhone 3G's antenna to see if that part is to blame for the phone's reception issues, and finds no obvious problems.
Swedish tech publication GP tests the iPhone 3G's antenna to see if that part is to blame for the phone's reception issues, and finds no obvious problems.
There were plenty of e-book readers on display at CES 2010, but many question whether the market for such dedicated devices can support all the new entrants.
Photos: E-readers at CES 2010
Vintage computer historians have long revered the Altair 8800. As it turns out, an unknown computer project at Sacramento State beat the Altair by three years.
Images: The first microcomputers
At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.
Add this feed to your online news reader
So... like it or not, you're stuck with AT&T forever.
You may now mark your calendars.
I think this is a very complex problem with many factors combining. I am sure lots of ATT and Apple engineers are loosing hair trying to understand the problem. Even when the problem is solved it may never be understood. Thinking about investing in the company that makes Rogaine.
It's not just 3G on the iPhone; it seems to be signal sensitivity period.
To maximize the period of time that an iPhone is in 3G coverage, the phone has been programmed to "hold" its 3G signal longer than other 3G phones. In parts of the Bay Area, for example, many non-iPhone 3G users can attest that their devices regularly cycle out of 3G to EDGE in supposedly strong 3G coverage zones. You can safely assume that they are in a handoff zone when this is happening. Because iPhones are programmed to hold on longer, they will wait on the 3G signal longer before switching back to the EDGE network - even when it has effectively disappeared. During this time, they are in a "dead zone," since the phone won't drop to EDGE on its own and the 3G signal that the device is waiting on is too weak to permit either data or voice.
This is a choice: some data users would prefer holding the 3G signal as long as possible (they're accommodated by the iPhone's style of programming), where others would tolerate slow throughput even when the 3G network is available to avoid dropped calls and signals (these people hate the iPhone's programming). It likely would not be resolved by a switch to T-Mobile, since it has a similar but even weaker network. Verizon would present a host of other problems, since Apple has tried to make the iPhone a "universal" product. Now you'll need CDMA receivers in addition to everything else that is already there. I suspect that realistically, you'll need to lose GPS to get CDMA. If you traded HSDPA/GSM for CDMA, you'll have a US/South Korea version of the iPhone that's different from the others.
Why does this affect everyone? Because the programming is the same in all regions. When they say that the "common thread" is AT&T, it is tantamount to saying that AT&T's network, more than the other networks, drove the choice. It's not because AT&T sucks or Apple sucks (I don't particularly love either organization), it's because they've made a joint decision that is having more of an impact and getting more press than they had expected.
- by cdtphilpot August 29, 2008 2:10 PM PDT
- Umm, maybe I got lucky but I have great reception and 1 maybe 2 dropped calls a week. I live in Oklahoma and I never have issues when traveling. Even when I go on business trips I don't have any issues.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (29 Comments)