A report Friday suggests that the furor over the discovery of a "blacklist" inside the iPhone's OS might have been a bit premature, since the URL only "blacklists" certain applications.
The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
Photos: Unboxing Nexus One
faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.
About Apple
At the start of the 21st century, there's no tech outfit more influential than Apple. CNET News' Erica Ogg and other reporters will attempt to make sense of the rumors, hype, products, and people that will shape the future of the company. But Apple's not the only game in town, as the established cell phone companies and others strike back against the iPhone. E-mail Erica at erica.ogg@cnet.com.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Apple topics
First it was "(insert name of Apple product here) Killer" iMac Killer, iPhone Killer, iTunes Killer, and so on and so on.
Google news search shows there are over one thousand "Kill Switch stores, and fewer than a hundred with the correct information.
Nice! The best laugh I've had today, Tom...
I don't hate Apple, I do own their products, but I have to say that I am VERY suspicious of any situation where Apple is the one to allay everyone's fears.
What the "Informed Source" says sounds like little more than giving the capability another name. Sounds like the proverbial "Rose by any other name".
I mean come on! Apple is the company that engaged in the highly suspect activity and now everyone is going to take them at their word?
Seriously, if consumers have the ability to "opt in" to this function sort of like a security software agreement then so be it. But there isn't an option with this code and it is an invasion of privacy.
I really don't care how "Small" or well intentioned it is. The fact remains that Apple was not the one who came out and declared that this program existed, it was a 3rd party. Apple has already shown that it has a track record of quietly implementing anti consumer policies (Ipod classic with embedded chip which prevents all non-apple A/V cables from playing video) I see no reason to believe that this is anything other than that.
Sounds like the sheeple will swallow anything they are fed, no matter how bad it smells.
It is sad that only tin foil stocks went crashing, right? That's how much the world respects privacy nowadays..
I see that some people are starting to buy tin foil hats again.
Interesting now that the "kill switch" story has been debunked, there has only been a few troll posts.
- by sjholcro August 12, 2008 5:17 AM PDT
- Why not vet the apps before they get released to the public. It's fair enough to let Apple decide what it wants to carry in the app store. Then they don't need to be in the position of telling people what they can't keep on their own devices.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(12 Comments)