Version: 2008
  • On CHOW: How to avoid dirty looks at cafes

Comments on: ISPs: We're limiting our own Usenet groups, not blocking others

New York state attorney general said he successfully pressured ISPs to limit the Usenet newsgroups they would offer. That doesn't mean they're blocking access to third-party services.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by mrorie June 12, 2008 11:16 AM PDT
There's never been a better time to shell out for Giganews if you enjoy using Usenet. The retention alone (which often reaches 30-60 days for binary groups, although good luck waiting to download those headers) far outmatches what most ISPs offer (a day or two at most).
Reply to this comment
by 13thDr July 4, 2008 10:58 AM PDT
Actually, they have up to 200 days retention on binary groups.
by June 12, 2008 11:29 AM PDT
Oh, thats all? Coercing an ISP to block the entire alt. branch? You're kidding right? Thats a really big deal. I love the quote from the ACLU, that its like using a hammer on an ant.
Reply to this comment
by June 12, 2008 11:30 AM PDT
Oh, thats all? Coercing an ISP to block the entire alt. branch? You're kidding right? Thats a really big deal. I love the quote from the ACLU, that its like using a hammer on an ant.
Reply to this comment
by Pixelslave June 12, 2008 11:57 AM PDT
May be it's just me, but I have a feeling that the NYS GA only asks to block the child porn groups, but the ISPs took the chance to cut access to usenets to their liking and place all the blames to the GA office. This fits perfectly to what the ISPs have been complaining -- a small group of users are using more resources (ex, support, bandwidth, storage, etc) than they ought to.
Reply to this comment
by Stormspace June 12, 2008 12:21 PM PDT
Time Warners site goes the extra mile. They lie that the reason is lack of demand for the service and not some back room deal cut with the AG in NY.
Reply to this comment
by Ray Weigel-2234497577447409954 June 12, 2008 12:49 PM PDT
Slippery slope, my friends. Who do they block next is the big questions. Gay sites? Black Power sites? Conspiracy Sites?

They will be blocking the following - for your own good, because you, dear reader, don't now what's good for you like Verizon and Time does:

alt.adoption
alt.arts.poetry.comments
alt.binaries.british.drama
alt.binaries.documentaries.french
alt.binaries.hdtv
alt.binaries.beatles

All gone.

Booooooooo!

It's interesting that Andrew Cuomo has replaced Eliot Spitzer as the District Attorney of New York. Eliot Spitzer was a Harvard educated bulldog/watchdog against malfeasence in the Wall Street Banking industry. He was taken down just before the Federal Reserve announced it would be GIVING ITSELF sweeping new regulatory powers.

It's called a pre-emptive strike. George Bush is famous for them.

Andrew Cuomo steps in saying he doesn't want to 'follow in the footsteps' of Eliot Spitzer - as if he could - so he will be going after the Lobbyists in Albany, New York. Instead, his first move is toward censorship.

The Nazis burned the works of Bertolt Brecht and Hellen Keller. I guess those would fall into alt.german.drama and alt.american.literature.

Won't someone think of the children!!!! What a joke.

Slippery Slope, indeed,

Ray
Reply to this comment
by Tod Smith June 12, 2008 12:53 PM PDT
If they wanted to filter porn just block all groups having to deal with sex at the location.

Time Warner better have a discount on services as they are REMOVING content and contectivity!
Reply to this comment
by devilsaltarboy June 12, 2008 1:07 PM PDT
ISP's have been wanting to limit newsgroups for a long time because of bandwidth concerns. The republican government isnt keen on them because of the existence of left wing political groups within the structure. So what better way to get rid of them than to associate them with child pornography because if you disagree with them it means you support child porn.
This is an issue of freedom of speech, if you limit newsgroups you hinder freedom of speech. At least China admits it blocks the internet, the USA does it in secret. It is simple to stop child porn on newsgroups, simply remove select groups and posts.
I wonder when we will have to do the Nazi solute to the Bush or risk the wrath of the SS
Reply to this comment
by tanis143 June 12, 2008 7:11 PM PDT
OMG are you that ignorant? Newsgroups hold all political groups, not just left wing! And they are not BLOCKING anything, they are simply either removing their own newsgroup servers or blocking certian alt binaries on their OWN servers. And to be honest, the newsgroups, though still popular with older generations and some younger generations, are not widely used when you view the percentage of broadband customers as a whole who use newsgroups.

Jesus, get a grip and pay for a newsgroup, everyone has known for many years that newsgroup servers offered by ISP's are inferior to paid access newsgroups.
by Tod Smith June 12, 2008 1:47 PM PDT
It bothers me to hear about Time Warner testing metering, removing P2P, and now Usenet. Reading your testing banning P2P and now removing Usenet when you could just block access to sex groups sounds more of a method of metering. Usenet can also filter by Server geographic locations like New York!

Why have high speed Internet faster than DSL with a $10 premium and can?t download P2P shareware and other free hard to get content?

None of this makes sence. In schools some access still exist to some adult Internet porn sites. I?m all for removing child porn at the expense of porn, but not for banning the Internet.
Reply to this comment
by Penguinisto June 12, 2008 3:34 PM PDT
s'okay... I think I'll be limiting any consideration I had for Verizon FiOS. I'm past-contract on the Comcast rig, and am at a point where I can shop for the lesser of all evils in regards to broadband. Not like my decision to not bother with Verizon will hurt them all that much, but at least I sleep better at night.
Reply to this comment
by old3eyes June 12, 2008 5:50 PM PDT
If NY State can get away with this then very soon the MPAA, RIAA and every other group will demand the same blocking. We're onm the slippery slope to Usnet censorship..
Reply to this comment
by Idgaf13 June 12, 2008 6:06 PM PDT
What we have is an State Attorney General who would like to be Governor and just wants headlines ,same formula as Eliot Spitzer.
I have no tolerance for certain types of behavior and child porn is on that list but
should we burn the libraries because they contain material that is offensive ?
As has been said ,this is a Very slippery slope and is exactly why we have police to investigate these types of crimes.

Coordination with AG's from other States and Countries would have certainly been the
more mature ,well reasoned approach.
With coordination of that type people of that ilk could be identified and shut down permantely
without trampling on our Constitutional Rights.
Reply to this comment
(14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

With eye to the future, try raw photos today

Raw photos are a hassle compared to JPEG. But if you like photography, the list of their image quality advantages is long and getting longer.

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.

About Politics and Law

News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement