Version: 2008

Comments on: 'Internet freedom' bill targeting China cooperation faces rough road

Proposal waiting for a floor vote in the House saying U.S. firms may not place certain servers in repressive nations faces opposition from the Bush administration and others.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Stormspace May 28, 2008 8:46 AM PDT
It's a sad day when American owned companies rat out people in oppressed nations. Especially when the penalties for civil disobedience in these countries can be life imprisonment or death. I would think these companies wouldn't need a law to know what's the right thing to do...
Reply to this comment
by cybervigilante May 28, 2008 9:14 AM PDT
So if our corporations bribe enough politicians to destroy net neutrality and get to virtually muzzle the net, how are we different from China? Except it's corporations instead of governments that will throttle freedom of speech.
Reply to this comment
by Pete Bardo May 28, 2008 10:32 AM PDT
Seems strange that Congress can simultaneously consider prohibiting placement of servers in 'nations deemed to be unreasonably "Internet-restricting"' while seeking to ban certain content from entering this country--child porn, Muslim, etc--in the name of protecting children anda fighting terrorism. If this bill goes through, many companies will consider limiting their liability by moving their servers out of the US. Congress, get a grip. No new laws!
Reply to this comment
by born2trade May 28, 2008 8:04 PM PDT
Yea well, i dont know why the US Congress thinks there is more freedom in the US, with Homeland Security Act, they can seize and shut down anything they deem a threat to the nation anyways... they just want more control so that people cannot fight back with home base in China and other countries... The US is always good with these heroic names, global online freedom, haha...
Reply to this comment
by born2trade May 28, 2008 8:04 PM PDT
Yea well, i dont know why the US Congress thinks there is more freedom in the US, with Homeland Security Act, they can seize and shut down anything they deem a threat to the nation anyways... they just want more control so that people cannot fight back with home base in China and other countries... The US is always good with these heroic names, global online freedom, haha...
Reply to this comment
by celt42 May 30, 2008 12:47 AM PDT
I?ve never understood why the US foams at the mouth over trade with Cuba but encourages trade with China. What?s the difference? Cuba is certainly repressive but China is much more so. It denies democracy to billions of people and it invaded and occupied another country - Tibet.

John Williams
Wales
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Politics and Law

News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement