Comments on: Wikileaks domain name yanked in spat over leaked documents
A California judge orders that domain name disabled after a Swiss bank says that confidential documents were posted -- but they've already been mirrored.
A California judge orders that domain name disabled after a Swiss bank says that confidential documents were posted -- but they've already been mirrored.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Time and again it's been proven true, and this episode is just another entry in the long list of useless attempts at reverting what cannot be reversed.
Once any piece of information is put on the 'Net, it becomes effectively eternal.
There is nothing there that is deemed worthy of removal.
Freedom of speech and whistle blow protection is what this site has and needs.
Just because a few neocons in govt office do not like what is posted does not make it wrong.
Besides that (sic) is usually capitalized, and regardless of the fact that you knew what he meant-which is the point of communication, isn't it--that's the best you can do to poke at the author?
Get off your high horse for minute, then go get a life.
Distribute the documents on peer-to-peer networks, and the law loses its power. While they can (because they have the infrastructure of violence via their police and armies) attack centralized targets, they cannot attack information that is thrown into the wind.
can review the material related to this issue.
- by OwlCreekObserver September 18, 2008 8:50 AM PDT
- I'm certainly no legal expert, but isn't THEFT the fundamental issue here? If I stole your credit cards and passed them along to my friends, all of us would be subject to arrest, right? How is stealing corporate information (or email belonging to a political candidate) any different?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(10 Comments)It seems to me that there's a big difference between voicing one's opinion and stealing information.