Version: 2008

Comments on: Google: We had no choice in Israel ID request

Contrary to reports that Google "voluntarily" divulged the IP address of an Israeli blogger sued for defamation, the company says that it did so only when "required" by a court order.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
Nice
by blade0925 November 28, 2007 2:48 AM PST
Playing both sides? I like it! Anyway, I agree with Google, it just made me laugh when i saw Google was actually debating with themselves.
Reply to this comment
Tell Me Something...
by arkangel_3 November 28, 2007 10:49 AM PST
How the heck can an Israeli Court have any kind of jurisdiction in the United States? Don't they have to go through the proper channels in the USA in order to get the information? Google is, after all, an American based company.

This is like a Russian Court ordering Google to turn over my information because I said some nasty things about President Putin.

The last time I looked, we had our own government with it's own courts and Constitution...or has someone now put Israel in charge of America?
Reply to this comment
The Internet Is NOT The United States
by FrankTurd November 28, 2007 11:58 AM PST
The Internet is global, sparky.

It doesn't matter where your servers or core businesses are located these days. The MPAA/RIAA sue P2P companies in other countries all the time (and win). If you don't protect yourself and use anonymous proxies to post criminally defamatory accusations, then you get what you deserve (a boot on the neck usually).

And yes, Israel own American politics and thus the court system as a result. Everyone knows that.
View reply
Israel court
by declan00 November 28, 2007 1:04 PM PST
Google opened an office in Israel, I think last month. So their representatives there are bound by Israeli law (and can be imprisoned if they don't comply).

Competing jurisdictions can be a problem. If I were a company in the blog-hosting business, I'd be very careful before expanding to countries with weaker free speech protections. It's bound to get you in trouble with one country or the other eventually.
View all 2 replies
Sounds familiar
by mearshon November 28, 2007 11:40 AM PST
Isn't this the same type of situation that Yahoo was faced with in China? It was a PR nightmare for Yahoo, I wonder if Google will get off easier because they are 'Google'?
Reply to this comment
Google aint that stupid
by t8 November 28, 2007 12:49 PM PST
Why would they divulge information willingly? They simply wouldn't unless they had to.

Their multi billion dollar industry sits on trust and they wouldn't be stupid enough to destroy that trust. Remember that they don't have a lock in business like Microsoft. So it doesn't pay for them to be evil. Even from a selfish point of view, it would cost them too much money and they get nothing in return for disclosing such information.

I say give them some credit. There is no way they are that stupid.
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Politics and Law

News at the intersection of technology, politics, and law, ranging from intellectual property to censorship to tech policy.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Politics and Law topics

advertisement
advertisement